“Just do it when you get a chance”: the effects of a background task on primary task performance

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2560-2574

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Durst, Moritz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multitasking interference; Reaction time; Task priority

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930509920     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0730-3     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Altmann, E.M., Trafton, J.G., Hambrick, D.Z. (2014). Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(1), 215–226. doi:10.1037/a0030986
2. Appelbaum, S.H., Marchionni, A., Fernandez, A. (2008). The multi-tasking paradox: Perceptions, problems and strategies. Management Decision, 46(9), 1313–1325. doi:10.1108/00251740810911966
3. Bergen, B., Medeiros-Ward, N., Wheeler, K., Drews, F., Strayer, D. (2013). The crosstalk hypothesis: why language interferes with driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 119–130. doi:10.1037/a0028428
4. Borger, R. (1963). The refractory period and serial choice-reactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 1–12. doi:10.1080/17470216308416546
5. Brainard, D.H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–437. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
6. Bratzke, D., Ulrich, R., Rolke, B., Schröter, H., Jentzsch, I., Leuthold, H. (2008). Motor limitation in dual-task processing with different effectors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1385–1399. doi:10.1080/17470210701536856
7. Brebner, J.M.T. (1977). In Dornič, S. (Ed.) The search for exceptions to the psychological refractory period, (pp. 63–78). NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
8. Caessens, B., Hommel, B., Reynvoet, B., Van der Goten, K. (2004). Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: the case of the SNARC effect. Journal of General Psychology, 131, 411–425.
9. Chong, R.K.Y., Mills, B., Dailey, L., Lane, E., Smith, S., Lee, K.H. (2010). Specific interference between a cognitive task and sensory organization for stance balance control in healthy young adults: visuospatial effects. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2709–2718. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.018
10. Davis, R. (1962). Choice reaction times and the theory of intermittency in human performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 157–166. doi:10.1080/17470216208416530
11. Dutta, A., Schweickert, R., Choi, S., Proctor, R.W. (1995). Cross-task cross talk in memory and perception. Acta Psychologica, 90, 49–62. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00021-L
12. Einstein, G.O., & McDaniel, M.A. (2005). Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6). doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x
13. Ferriss, T. (2007). The 4-Hour Workweek: Crown Publishing Group.
14. Gleick, J. (1999). Faster: The acceleration of just about everything. New York, NY, US: Pantheon Books.
15. Gottsdanker, R. (1980). In Stelmach, G.E., & Requin, J. (Eds.) The ubiquitous role of preparation, (pp. 355–372). North Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
16. Greenwald, A.G., & Shulman, H.G. (1973). On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101(1), 70–76.
17. Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., Remington, R.W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291–345. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001
18. Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 46–64. doi:10.1007/BF02940852
19. Hiscock, M. (1982). Verbal-manual time sharing in children as a function of task priority. Brain & Cognition, 1(1), 119–131. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(82)90010-0.
20. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1368–1384. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1368
21. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0100-y
22. Huynh, H. (1978). Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 43, 161–175. doi:10.1007/BF02293860
23. Janssen, C.P., Brumby, D.P., Garnett, R. (2012). Natural break points: the influence of priorities and cognitive and motor cues on dual-task interleaving. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(1), 5–29. doi:10.1177/1555343411432339
24. Jersild, A.T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology Whole no. 89.
25. Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178. doi:10.1080/14640746808400145
26. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A.M., Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin136(5), 849–874. doi:10.1037/a0019842
27. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D.H., Pelli, D.G. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(14), 1.
28. Ko, Y.T., & Miller, J.O. (2014). Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task. Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 30–37. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000224
29. Leonhard, T., Ruiz Fernández, S., Ulrich, R., Miller, J.O. (2011). Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37(1), 115–136. doi:10.1037/a0019238
30. Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 507–525. doi:10.1002/acp.1378
31. Lien, M.C., Ruthruff, E., Hsieh, S., Yu, Y.T. (2007). Parallel central processing between tasks: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 133–141. doi:10.3758/BF03194040
32. Logan, G.D., & Schulkind, M.D. (2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1072–1090. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1072
33. Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.) Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII, (pp. 377–399). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
34. Meyer, D.E., & Kieras, D.E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3
35. Miller, J.O. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research, 70, 484–493. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9
36. Miller, J.O., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Mental chronometry and individual differences: modeling reliabilities and intercorrelations of reaction time means and effect sizes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 819–858. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0404-5
37. Miller, J.O., Ulrich, R., Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273–310. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
38. Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (Eds.) (2000). Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
39. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327–342. doi:10.3758/BF03194391
40. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.214
41. Navon, D., & Miller, J.O. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 435–448. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.435
42. Navon, D., & Miller, J.O. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 193–251. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0767
43. Norman, D.A., & Bobrow, D.G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3
44. Norman, D.A., & Bobrow, D.G. (1976). On the analysis of performance operating characteristics. Psychological Review, 83, 508–510. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.83.6.508
45. Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
46. Pashler, H.E. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10(3), 358–377. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.358
47. Pashler, H.E. (1992). Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 44–48. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509734
48. Pashler, H.E. (1998). Attention. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Pashler, H.E. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (Eds.) Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII, (pp. 277–307). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
50. Pashler, H.E., & Johnston, J.C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 19–45. doi:10.1080/14640748908402351
51. Pelli, D.G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Psychological Science, 10, 437–442.
52. Peterson, L.R. (1969). Concurrent verbal activity. Psychological Review, 76(4), 376–386. doi:10.1037/h0027443
53. Rogers, R.D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 124(2), 207–231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
54. Rosen, C. (2008). The myth of multitasking. The New Atlantis, 20, 105–110. URL http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-myth-of-multitasking
55. Ruiz Fernández, S., & Ulrich, R. (2010). Late backward effects in the refractory period paradigm: effects of task 2 execution on task 1 performance. Psychological Research, 74(4), 378–387. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0260-0
56. Schubert, T., Fischer, R., Stelzel, C. (2008). Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 34, 376–397. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.376
57. Schumacher, E.H., Seymour, T.L., Glass, J.M., Fencsik, D.E., Lauber, E.J., Kieras, D.E., Meyer, D.E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101–108. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00318
58. Schwarz, W., & Miller, J.O. (2012). Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 555–574. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0254-6
59. Shaffer, L.H. (1975). Multiple attention in continuous verbal tasks. In Rabbitt, P.M.A., & Dornič, S. (Eds.) Attention and performance V., (pp. 157–167): Academic Press, New York, NY, US.
60. Spelke, E., Hirst, W., Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215–230. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(76)90018-4
61. Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 46, 640–649. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.4.640.56806
62. Telford, C.W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–36. doi:10.1037/h0073262
63. Thomson, S.J., & Watter, S. (2013). Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel task 2 response activation contributes to overt task 2 performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(5), 934–953. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0457-6
64. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2002). All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon. Psychological Research, 66, 274–286. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0101-x
65. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J.O. (2008). Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects. Cognitive Psychology, 57(2), 75–121. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.004
66. Watter, S., & Logan, G.D. (2006). Parallel response-selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 254–277. doi:10.3758/BF03193674
67. Welford, A.T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance—a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x
68. Welford, A.T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27, 5–22. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90040-6
69. Wickens, C.D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D.R. (Eds.) Varieties of attention, (pp. 63–102). New York, NY, US: Academic Press.