Enhanced osteoblast cells adhesion, spreading, and proliferation to surface-carboxylated poly(etheretherketone)

Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 302-318

  Zheng, Yanyan ^a,b   Xiong, Chengdong ^a   Wang, Zhecun ^a,b   Zhang, Lifang ^a  

^a CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

biomaterials; carboxyl groups; osteoblast cells; Poly(etheretherketone); surface modification

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CONTACT ANGLE; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; HYDROXYLATION; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; SILICON IMPLANTS; STIFFNESS; SURFACE TREATMENT; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; CARBOXYL GROUPS; FUNCTIONAL SURFACES; ORGANOSILANE SELF-ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS; OSTEOBLAST CELLS; SEMICRYSTALLINE THERMOPLASTICS; SURFACE HYDROXYLATIONS; WATER CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENT;

CELLS;

CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; POLY(ETHERETHERKETONE); POLYMER; SILANE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; CARBOXYLATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; HYDROXYLATION; MC3T3 EI CELL; OSTEOBLAST; REDUCTION; SUBSTITUTION REACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84930421806     PISSN: 08839115     EISSN: 15308030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0883911515572494     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007 ; 28: 4845-4869
2. Abu Bakar MS, Cheng MHW, Tang SM, et al. Tensile properties, tension-tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials. 2003 ; 24: 2245-2250
3. Godara A, Raabe D, Green S. The influence of sterilization processes on the micromechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites for bone implant applications. Acta Biomater. 2007 ; 3: 209-220
4. Wenz L, Merritt K, Brown S, et al. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 ; 24: 207-215
5. Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, et al. Polyetheretherketone - cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002 ; 23: 1749-1759
6. Morrison C, Macnair R, MacDonald C, et al. In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 1995 ; 16: 987-992
7. Awaja F, Bax DV, Zhang S, et al. Cell Adhesion to PEEK treated by plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition for active medical implants. Plasma Process Polym. 2012 ; 9: 355-362
8. von Wilmowsky C, Lutz R, Meisel U, et al. In vivo evaluation of beta-TCP containing 3D laser sintered poly(ether ether ketone) composites in pigs. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2009 ; 24: 169-184
9. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, et al. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials. 1996 ; 17: 137-146
10. Han CM, Lee EJ, Kim HE, et al. The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials. 2010 ; 31: 3465-3470
11. Robotti P, Zappini G PEEK biomaterials handbook. Kurtz SM, ed. Oxford: William Andrew Publishing ; 2012: 119-143.
12. Noiset O, Schneider YJ, Marchand-Brynaert J. Surface modification of poly(aryl ether ether ketone) (PEEK) film by covalent coupling of amines and amino acids through a spacer arm. J Polym Sci Pol Chem. 1997 ; 35: 3779-3790
13. Daw R, Candan S, Beck A, et al. Plasma copolymer surfaces of acrylic acid/1, 7 octadiene: surface characterisation and the attachment of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials. 1998 ; 19: 1717-1725
14. Detomaso L, Gristina R, Senesi GS, et al. Stable plasma-deposited acrylic acid surfaces for cell culture applications. Biomaterials. 2005 ; 26: 3831-3841
15. Scotchford CA, Cooper E, Leggett GJ, et al. Growth of human osteoblast-like cells on alkanethiol on gold self-assembled monolayers: the effect of surface chemistry. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 ; 41: 431-442
16. Lee JH, Park JW, Lee HB. Cell adhesion and growth on polymer surfaces with hydroxyl groups prepared by water vapour plasma treatment. Biomaterials. 1991 ; 12: 443-448
17. Savoji H, Hadjizadeh A, Maire M, et al. Electrospun nanofiber scaffolds and plasma polymerization: a promising combination towards complete, stable endothelial lining for vascular grafts. Macromol Biosci. 2014 ; 14: 1084-1095
18. Liu W, Cai Q, Zhang F, et al. Dose-dependent enhancement of bone marrow stromal cells adhesion, spreading and osteogenic differentiation on atmospheric plasma-treated poly(l-lactic acid) nanofibers. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2013 ; 28: 453-467
19. Zhao Y, Wong HM, Wang W, et al. Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials. 2013 ; 34: 9264-9277
20. Arima Y, Iwata H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials. 2007 ; 28: 3074-3082
21. Scotchford CA, Gilmore CP, Cooper E, et al. Protein adsorption and human osteoblast-like cell attachment and growth on alkylthiol on gold self-assembled monolayers. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 ; 59: 84-99
22. Faucheux N, Schweiss R, Lützow K, et al. Self-assembled monolayers with different terminating groups as model substrates for cell adhesion studies. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25: 2721-2730
23. Nakaoka R, Yamakoshi Y, Isama K, et al. Effects of surface chemistry prepared by self-assembled monolayers on osteoblast behavior. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010 ; 94A: 524-532
24. Toworfe G, Bhattacharyya S, Composto R, et al. Effect of functional end groups of silane self-assembled monolayer surfaces on apatite formation, fibronectin adsorption and osteoblast cell function. J Tissue Eng Regen M. 2009 ; 3: 26-36
25. Goddard JM, Hotchkiss JH. Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds. Prog Polym Sci. 2007 ; 32: 698-725
26. Cheng JY, Wei CW, Hsu KH, et al. Direct-write laser micromachining and universal surface modification of PMMA for device development. Sensor Actuat B: Chem. 2004 ; 99: 186-196
27. Long TM, Prakash S, Shannon MA, et al. Water-vapor plasma-based surface activation for trichlorosilane modification of PMMA. Langmuir. 2006 ; 22: 4104-4109
28. Noiset O, Henneuse C, Schneider YJ, et al. Surface reduction of poly(aryl ether ether ketone) film: UV spectrophotometric, H-3 radiochemical, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic assays of the hydroxyl functions. Macromolecules. 1997 ; 30: 540-548
29. Blundell DJ, Osborn BN. The morphology of poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone). Polymer. 1983 ; 24: 953-958
30. Naffakh M, Gomez MA, Ellis G, et al. Thermal properties, structure and morphology of PEEK/thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer blends. Polym Int. 2003 ; 52: 1876-1886
31. Lu X, Zuo Y, Zhao X, et al. The improved performance of a Mg-rich epoxy coating on AZ91D magnesium alloy by silane pretreatment. Corrosion Sci. 2012 ; 60: 165-172
32. Briggs D, Fairley N. XPS of chemically modified low-density polyethylene surfaces: observations on curve-fitting the C 1s spectrum. Surf Interface Anal. 2002 ; 33: 283-290
33. Zheng Y, Xiong C, Zhang L. Formation of bone-like apatite on plasma-carboxylated poly(etheretherketone) surface. Mater Lett. 2014 ; 126: 147-150
34. Zhang G, Sun S, Yang D, et al. The surface analytical characterization of carbon fibers functionalized by H2SO4/HNO3 treatment. Carbon. 2008 ; 46: 196-205
35. Wijenayaka AK, Colby CB, Atkins GJ, et al. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating on glass coverslips for the assay of osteoclast activity in vitro. J Mater Sci: Mater M. 2009 ; 20: 1467-1473
36. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000 ; 21: 667-681
37. Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N, et al. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Mat Sci Eng C. 2003 ; 23: 551-560
38. Hao L, Lawrence J, Chian KS. Osteoblast cell adhesion on a laser modified zirconia based bioceramic. J Mater Sci: Mater M. 2005 ; 16: 719-726
39. Zhu XL, Chen J, Scheideler L, et al. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25: 4087-4103
40. Myung SW, Ko YM, Kim BH. Effect of plasma surface functionalization on preosteoblast cells spreading and adhesion on a biomimetic hydroxyapatite layer formed on a titanium surface. Appl Surf Sci. 2013 ; 287: 62-68
41. Zhang Z, Sun J, Hu H, et al. Osteoblast-like cell adhesion on porous silicon-incorporated TiO2 coating prepared by micro-arc oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2011 ; 97B: 224-234