Surface modification of poly(aryl ether ether ketone) (PEEK) film by covalent coupling of amines and amino acids through a spacer arm

Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 17, 1997, Pages 3779-3790

  Noiset, Olivier ^a   Schneider, Yves Jacques ^a   Marchand Brynaert, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Biomaterial; Cell cultivation; PEEK animation; PEEK carboxylation; PEEK film; Surface reactivity assay; Surface wet chemistry

Indexed keywords

AMINATION; AMINES; AMINO ACIDS; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; BIOASSAY; BIOMATERIALS; CARBOXYLATION; HYDROLYSIS; POLYETHER ETHER KETONES; RADIOACTIVITY; SCINTILLATION COUNTERS; SURFACE TREATMENT;

SURFACE REACTIVITY ASSAY; SURFACE WET CHEMISTRY;

PLASTIC FILMS;

EID: 0031373557     PISSN: 0887624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(199712)35:17<3779::AID-POLA17>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. F. H. Silver, Biomaterials, Medical Devices and Tissue Engineering, an Integrated Approach, Chapman and Hall, London, 1994.
2. K. L. Audus, R. L. Bartel, I. J. Hidalgo, and R. T. Borchardt, Pharmacol. Res., 7, 435 (1990).
3. J.-L. Dewez, A. Doren, Y.-J. Schneider, R. Legras, and P. Rouxhet, in Interfaces in New Materials, P. Grange and B. Delmon, Eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1991, p. 84.
4. L.-S. Gan, C. Eads, T. Niederer, A. Bridgers, S. Yanni, P.-H. Hsyu, F. J. Pritchard, and D. Thakker, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 20, 615 (1994).
5. C. Halleux and Y.-J. Schneider, J. Cell. Physiol., 158, 17 (1994).
6. H. J. Griesser, R. C. Chatelier, T. R. Gengenbach, G. Johnson, and J. G. Steele, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 5, 531 (1994).
7. W. J. Feast and H. S. Munro, Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.
8. J. A. Hubbell, in Cardiovasc. Pathol. Suppl., 2, 121S (1993).
9. N. A. Peppas and R. Langer, Science, 263, 1715 (1994).
10. J. A. Hubbell, Trends Polym. Sci., 2, 20 (1994).
11. Y. Ykada, Biomaterials, 15, 725 (1994).
12. T. Sergent-Engelen, V. Delistrie, and Y.-J. Schneider, Biochem. Pharmacol., 46, 1393 (1993).
13. S. Jaumotte-Thelen, I. Dozot-Dupont, J. Marchand-Brynaert, and Y.-J. Schneider, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 7, 162 (1996).
14. S. Jaumotte-Thelen, I. Dozot-Dupont, J. Marchand-Brynaert, and Y.-J. Schneider, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 32, 569 (1996).
15. O. Noiset, C. Henneuse, Y.-J. Schneider, and J. Marchand-Brynaert, Macromolecules, 30, 540 (1997).
16. J. Marchand-Brynaert, G. Pantano, and O. Noiset, Polymer, 38, 1387 (1997).
17. O. Petillo, G. Peluso, L. Ambrosio, L. Nicolais, W. J. Kao, and J. M. Anderson, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 28, 635 (1994).
18. C. Morrison, R. Macnair, C. MacDonald, A. Wykman, I. Goldie, and M. H. Grant, Biomaterials, 16, 987 (1995).
19. J. Marchand-Brynaert, O. Noiset, and Y.-J. Schneider, EPF'94 Proceedings, 5th European Polymer Federation Symposium on Polymer Materials), 2/30 (1994).
20. J. Marchand-Brynaert, T. Boxus, M. Deldime-Rubbens, C. Henneuse, S. Jaumotte-Thelen, P. Mougenot, O. Noiset, and Y.-J. Schneider, ICPS-2 Proceedings, International Conference on Polymer-Solid Interface, Namur, Belgium, Namur University Press, 1997.
21. N. L. Franchina and T. J. McCarthy, in Chemically Modified Surfaces, H. A. Mottola and J. R. Steinmetz, Eds., Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992, p. 173.
22. C. Henneuse, K. Gillard, O. Noiset, and J. Marchand-Brynaert, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 132, 333 (1995).
23. C. Henneuse, T. Boxus, L. Tesolin, G. Pantano, and J. Marchand-Brynaert, Synthesis, 495 (1996).
24. O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265 (1951).
25. T. Koch and H. Ritter, Macromolecules, 28, 4806 (1995).
26. G. S. Bennett, R. J. Farris, and S. A. Thompson, Polymer, 32, 1633 (1991).
27. A. G. Shard and J. P. S. Badyal, Macromolecules, 25, 2053 (1992).
28. C. Jama, O. Dessaux, P. Goudmand, L. Gengembre, and J. Grimblot, Surface Interface Anal., 18, 751 (1992).
29. H. Kobayashi and Y. Ikada, Biomaterials, 12, 747 (1991).
30. Y. Hirano, T. Hayashi, K. Goto, and A. Nakajima, Polym. Bull., 26, 363 (1991).
31. A. Kondoh, K. Mikano, and T. Matsuda, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 47, 1983 (1993).
32. T. J. Tondeur, G. Vandendunghen, and M. Watelet, Chim. Nouvelle, 10, 1148 (1992).
33. y], where (x + y) = 1. For x = 0.15 and y = 0.85, the calculated N/C × 100 atomic ratio was 6.81 (experimental value = 6.96).
34. A. Chiltoki, B. D. Ratner, and D. Briggs, Chem. Mater., 3, 51 (1991).
35. Y. Tamada and Y. Ikada, Polymer, 34, 2209 (1993).
36. A. P. Ameen, R. J. Ward, R. D. Short, G. Beamson, and D. Briggs, Polymer, 34, 1795 (1993).
37. M. Deldime, J.-L. Dewez, Y.-J. Schneider, and J. Marchand-Brynaert, Appl. Surf. Sci., 90, 1 (1995).
38. P. Mougenot and J. Marchand-Brynaert, Macromolecules, 29, 3552 (1996).
39. M. R. Alexander, P. V. Wright, and B. D. Ratner, Surface Interface Anal., 24, 217 (1996).
40. The low percentage of F atoms in the blank means that the residual carbonyl functions of the PEEK-OH (about 15%) are practically unreactive. Indeed, the PEEK carbonyl functions are part of benzophenone motifs. It is well established in organic synthesis that benzophenone is poorly ractive towards nucleophiles (steric effect; stabilization by resonance), and that the formation of Schiff's bases requires acid catalysis.
41. z], where (y + z) = 0.85. For y = 0.05 and z = 0.80, the calculated N/C × 100 atomic ratio was 8.77 (experimental value = 8.6). For y = 0.35 and z = 0.45, the calculated F/C × 100 atomic ratio was 5.4 (experimental value = 5.51).
42. J. Marchand-Brynaert, M. Deldime, I. Dupont, J.-L. Dewez, and Y.-J. Schneider, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 173, 236 (1995).
43. P. Mougenot, M. Koch, I. Dupont, Y.-J Schneider, and J. Marchand-Brynaert, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 177, 162 (1996).
44. T. Boxus, M. Deldime-Rubbens, P. Mougenot, Y.-J. Schneider, and J. Marchand-Brynaert, Polym. Adv. Technol., 7, 589 (1996).
45. z], where (y + z) = 0.85. For y = 0.55 and z = 0.30, the calculated N/C × 100 atomic ratio was 7.56 (experimental value = 7.51).
46. z], where (y + z) = 0.85. For y = 0.6 and z = 0.25, the calculated N/C × 100 atomic ratio was 8.24 (experimental value = 8.25).
47. J. H. Lee and H. B. Lee, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 4. 467 (1993).
48. Y. Tamada and Y. Ikada, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 155, 334 (1993).
49. W. S. Ramsey, W. Hertl, D. E. Nowlan, and N. J. Binkowski, In Vitro, 20, 802 (1984).
50. P. B. van Wachem, A. H. Hogt, T. Beugeling, J. Feijen, A. Bantjes, J. P. Detmers, and W. G. van Aken, Biomaterials, 8, 323 (1987).
51. J. H. Lee, H. W. Jung, I.-J. Kang, and H. B. Lee, Biomaterials, 15, 705 (1994).
52. H. J. Griesser, R. C. Chatelier, T. R. Gengenbach, G. Johnson, and J. G. Steele, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 5, 531 (1994).