Analysis of an advisor-advisee relationship: An exploratory study of the area of Exact and Earth Sciences in Brazil

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Tuesta, Esteban F ^a   Delgado, Karina V ^a   Mugnaini, Rogério ^a   Digiampietri, Luciano A ^a   Mena Chalco, Jesús P ^b   Pérez Alcázar, José J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; BIBLIOMETRICS; BRAZIL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COAUTHOR; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FACULTY STUDENT RELATION; GEOLOGY; HUMAN; KULCZYNSKI INDEX; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; POSTGRADUATE STUDENT; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH STUDENT; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; WRITING; HUMAN RELATION; MENTOR; PERSONNEL;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; BRAZIL; EARTH SCIENCES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MENTORS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84930221861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129065     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. de Meis L, Arruda AP, Guimaraes J. The impact of science in Brazil. IUBMB Life. 2007; 59(4-5):227-234. doi: 10.1080/15216540701258140 PMID: 17505957
2. Coutinho RX, Dávila ES, dos Santos WM, Rocha JaBT, Souza DOG, Folmer V, et al. Brazilian scientific production in science education. Scientometrics. 2012; 92(3):697-710. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0645-5
3. Bin A, Salles-Filho S, Capanema LM, Colugnati FAB. What difference does it make? Impact of peer-reviewed scholarships on scientific production. Scientometrics. 2014;online(1:):1-22.
4. Pinheiro D, Melkers J, Youtie J. Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2014; 81:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008
5. Igami MPZ, Bressiani JC, Mugnaini R. A new model to identify the productivity of theses in terms of articles using co-word analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research. 2014; 3:3-14.
6. Salmi LR, Gana S, Mouillet E. Publication pattern of medical theses, France 1993-98. Medical Education. 2001; 35(1):18-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00768.x PMID: 11123590
7. Frkovic V, Skender T, Dojcinovic B. Publishing scientific papers based on Master's and Ph.D. theses from a small community: case study Croatian medical schools. Croatian Medical Journal. 2003; 44 (1):107-111. PMID: 12590439
8. Ramos PS, Furtado EC, Carvalho ERF, Campos MO, Cortes de Souza DVB, Almeida LDP, et al. Dissertações e Teses de Pós Graduação geram publicação de artigos científicos? Análise baseada em 3 programas da área de educação física. Brazilian Journal Biomotricity. 2009; 3(4):315-324.
9. Sacardo MS, Hayashi MCPI. Balanço bibliométrico da produção científica em Educação Física e Educação Especial oriunda de teses e dissertações. RBPG Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação. 2011; 8 (15):111-135.
10. Arriola-Quiroz I, Curioso WH, Cruz-Encarnacion M, Gayoso O. Characteristics and publication pattern of theses from a Peruvian medical school. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2010; 27:148-154. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00878.x PMID: 20565556
11. Anwar MA. From doctoral dissertation to publication. A study of 1995 American graduates in library and information science. Journal of Librarian and Information Science. 2004; 36 (4):151-157. doi: 10.1177/0961000604050565
12. Lee WM. Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 2000; 51(2):139-144. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2%3C139::AID-ASI5%3E3.0.CO;2-1
13. Mallette LA. Publishing rates of graduates education Ph.D. and Ed.D. students: a longitudinal study of University of California schools. Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database (UMI No 3239922). 2006;.
14. Sayers MK, Wood FE. The use and value of MSc Information Studies dissertations. Journal of Information Science. 1991; 17(5):307-314. doi: 10.1177/016555159101700507
15. Larivière V. On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge. Scientometrics. 2012; 90(2):463-481. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0495-6
16. Fonseca L, Velloso S, Wofchuk S, Meis L. The relationship between advisors and students. Scientometrics. 1998; 41(3):299-312. doi: 10.1007/BF02459047
17. Mainhard T, van der Rijst R, van Tartwijk J, Wubbels T. A model for the supervisor doctoral student relationship. Higher Education. 2009; 58(3):359-373. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
18. Golde CM. Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education. 2000; 23(2):199-227. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0004
19. Kam BH. Style and quality in research supervision: the supervisor dependency factor. Higher Education. 1997; 34(1):81-103. doi: 10.1023/A:1002946922952
20. Marsh HW, Rowe KJ, Martin A. Ph.D. Students? Evaluations of Research Supervision. Higher Education. 2002; 73(3):313-348. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0028
21. McAlpine L, Norton J. Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development. 2006; 25(1):3-17. doi: 10.1080/07294360500453012
22. Kamler B. Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education. 2008; 33(3):283-294. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049236
23. Netting FE, Nichols-Casebolt A. Authorship and collaboration. Journal of Social Work Education. 1997; 33(3):555-564.
24. Goldsmith SS, Presley JB, Cooley EA. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program; 2002. Final Evaluation Report. Virginia: NSF.
25. Wang C, Han J, Jia Y, Tang J, Zhang D, Yu Y, et al. Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks. In: Knowledge Data Discovery (KDD); 2010. p. 203-212.
26. Wang C, Han J, Li Q, Li X, Lin WP, Ji H. Learning Hierarchical Relationships among Partially Ordered Objects with Heterogeneous Attributes and Links. In; Proceedings of 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining; 2012. p.516-527.
27. Wu T, Chen Y, Han J. Association Mining in Large Databases: A Re-examination of Its Measures. In: Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD; 2007 p. 621-628.
28. Wu T, Chen Y, Han J. Re-examination of interestingness measures in pattern mining: a unified framework. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2010; 21(3):371-397. doi: 10.1007/s10618-009-0161-2
29. Mena-Chalco JP, Digiampietri LA, Lopes FM, Cesar RM. Brazilian bibliometric coauthorship networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014; 65(7):1424-1445. doi: 10.1002/asi.23010
30. Digiampietri LA, Mena-Chalco JP, Vaz de Melo POS, Malheiro APR, Meira DNO, Franco LF, et al. BraX-Ray: An X-Ray of the Brazilian Computer science Graduate Programs. PLoS ONE. 2014 04; 9 (4):e94541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094541 PMID: 24728179
31. Digiampietri LA, Mugnaini R, Mena-Chalco JP, Delgado KV, Alcazar JJP. Análise macro das últimas atualizações dos Currículos Lattes. Em Questão Edição Especial. 2014; 20(3):88-113.
32. Myers JL, Well AD. Research Design and Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003.
33. Halpern J, Parkes D. Journals for certification, conferences for rapid dissemination. Communications of the ACM. 2011; 54(8):36-38. doi: 10.1145/1978542.1978555
34. Franceschet M. The role of conference publications in Computer Science: a bibliometric view. Communications of the ACM. 2010; 53(12):129-132. doi: 10.1145/1859204.1859234
35. Vardi M.Conferences vs. Journals in Computing Research. Communications of the ACM. 2009; 52(15).
36. Glänzel W, Schubert A. Analysing scientific networks through coauthorship. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. p. 257-276.
37. Struppa DC. The New Publishing Scene and the Tenure Case: An Administrator's View. Notice of the AMS. 2012; 59(5):670-671.
38. Mena-Chalco J, Cesar-Jr R. Towards automatic discovery of co-authorship networks in the Brazilian academic areas. In: IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science; 2011. p. 53-60.
39. de Souza Vanz SA, Stumpf IRC. Colaboração científica: revisão teórico conceitual. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação. 2010; 15(2):42-55.
40. Leta J. Human resources and scientific output in Brazilian science: Mapping astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Aslib Proceedings. 2005; 57(3):217-231. doi: 10.1108/00012530510599181