Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 283-294

  Kamler, Barbara ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45749129096     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070802049236     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dinham, S., and C. Scott. 2001. The experience of disseminating the results of doctoral research. Journal of Further and Higher Education 25, no. 1: 45-55.
2. Engestrom, C.M. 1999. Promoting the scholarly writing of female doctoral students in higher education and student affairs programs. NASPA [National Association of Student Personnel Administrators] Journal 36, no. 4: 264-77.
3. European University Association. 2005. Doctoral programmes for the European knowledge society: Final report. Brussels: European University Association.
4. Evans, T.D. 2002. Part-time research students: Are they producing knowledge where it counts? Higher Education Research and Development 21, no. 2: 155-65.
5. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. London: Polity Press.
6. Golde, C., and G. Walker. 2006. Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. Carnegie essays on the doctorate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Green, R., E. Hutchison, and B. Sra. 1992. Evaluating scholarly performance: The productivity of graduates of social work doctoral programs. Social Services ReviewSeptember: 441-66.
8. Kamler, B., C. Beavis, J. O'Mara, and A. Allard. 2003. Becoming authorised: An investigation of quality doctoral writing in education and science. Funded by the Quality Learning Research Priority Area, Faculty of Education, Deakin University, Australia.
9. Kamler, B., and P. Thomson. 2006. Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. New York and London: Routledge.
10. Lee, A., and D. Boud. 2003. Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 2: 187-200.
11. Lee, A., and B. Kamler. Forthcoming. Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publication. Teaching in Higher Education 13.
12. Leonard, D., R. Becker, and K. Coate. 2004. 'To prove myself at the highest level': The benefits of doctoral study. Higher Education Research and Development 24, no. 2: 135-49.
13. McGrail, M.R., C.M. Rickard, and R. Jones. 2006. Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development 25, no. 1: 19-35.
14. Page-Adams, D., L.C. Cheng, A. Gogineni, and C.Y. Shen. 1995. Establishing a group to encourage writing for publication among doctoral students. Journal of Social Work Education 31, no. 3: 402-7.
15. Pearson, M. 1999. The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: implications for quality management, improvement and innovation. Higher Education Research and Development 18, no. 3: 269-87.
16. Powell, S. 2004. Award of the PhD by published work in the UK. Lichfield: UK Council for Graduate Education.
17. Siddle, D. 1997. Submission to the committee conducting the review of Higher Education Financing and Policy from Deans and Directors of Graduate Education. http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hereview/submissions.