Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 139-144

  Lee, Wade M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS; TECHNICAL WRITING;

DOCTORAL STUDENTS; PUBLICATIONS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033877112     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<139::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baird, L.L. (1990). Disciplines and doctorates: The relationships between program characteristics and the duration of doctoral study. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 369-385.
2. Bayer, A.E., & Smart, J.C. (1991). Career publication patterns and collaborative "styles" in American academic science. Journal of Higher Education, 62(6), 615-636.
3. Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Bieber, J.P., & Blackburn, R.T. (1993). Faculty research productivity 1972-1988: Development and application of constant units of measure. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 551-567.
5. Bowen, W.G., Lord, G., & Sosa, J.A. (1991). Measuring time to the doctorate: Reinterpretation of the evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88(3), 713-717.
6. Brown, D.G. (1967). The Mobile professors. Washington: American Council on Education.
7. Costa, M.M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science, 3(6), 354-357.
8. Endersby, J.W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77(2), 375-392.
9. Fields, C.M. (1983, Sept. 14). Professors' demands for credit as "coauthors" of students' research projects may be rising. Chronicle of Higher Education, 7, 10.
10. Fine, M.A., & Kurdek, L.A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141-1147.
11. Fernandez, J.A. (1998). The transition from an individual science to a collective one: The case of astronomy. Scientometrics, 42(1), 61-74.
12. Garfield, E. (1995). Giving credit only where it is due: The problem of defining authorship. Scientist, 9(19), 13.
13. Holaday, M., & Yost, T.E. (1995). A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 281-291.
14. McGinnis, R., Allison, P.D., & Long, J.S. (1982). Postdoctoral training in bioscience: Allocation and outcomes. Social Forces, 60(3), 701-722.
15. Nelson, K.G. (1964) Professional publications of teaching faculty in higher education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Montreal, December 27, 1964.
16. Norris, R.P. (1993). Authorship patterns in CJNR: 1970-1991. Scientometrics, 28(2), 151-158.
17. Pasewark, R.A., Fitzgerald, B.J., & Sawyer, R.N. (1975). Psychology of the scientists: XXXII. God at the synapse: Research activities of clinical, experimental, and physiological psychologists. Psychological Reports, 36, 671-674.
18. Petry, G.H., & Kerr, H.S. (1982). Pressure to publish increases incidence of co-authorship. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(1982), 495.
19. Price, D.J. de Solla. (1965). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Rodgers, R.C., & Maranto, C.L. (1989). Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 636-649.
21. Tuckman, H.P., Coyle, S., & Bae, Y. (1989). The lengthening of time to completion of the doctorate degree. Research in Higher Education, 30(5), 503-516.
22. White, K.D., Dalgleish, L., & Arnold G. (1982). Authorship patterns in psychology: national and international trends. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(4), 190-192.