The influence of organizational context on best practice use by care aides in residential long-term care settings

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 537.e1-537.e10

  Estabrooks, Carole A ^a   Squires, Janet E ^b,c   Hayduk, Leslie ^a   Morgan, Debra ^d,e   Cummings, Greta G ^a   Ginsburg, Liane ^f   Stewart, Norma ^e   McGilton, Katherine ^g   Kang, Sung Hyun ^a   Norton, Peter G ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^f YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aide; Alberta context tool; Best practice; Context; Nursing home; Research use; TREC

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NURSING ASSISTANT; NURSING HOME; NURSING KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PREDICTION; SEX; SOCIAL CAPITAL; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKING TIME; BENCHMARKING; CANADA; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; STANDARDS;

BENCHMARKING; CANADA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NURSES' AIDES; NURSING HOMES; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84929960166     PISSN: 15258610     EISSN: 15389375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Morley J.E., Caplan G., Cesari M., et al. International survey of nursing home research priorities. JAm Med Dir Assoc 2014, 15:309-312.
2. Morley J.E. Certified nursing assistants: A key to resident quality of life. JAm Med Dir Assoc 2014, 15:610-612.
3. Boström A.M., Slaughter S.E., Chojecki D., et al. What do we know about knowledge translation in the care of older adults? a scoping review. JAm Med Dir Assoc 2012, 13:210-219.
4. Janes N., Sidani S., Cott C., et al. Figuring it out in the moment: A theory of unregulated care providers' knowledge utilization in dementia care settings. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2008, 5:13-24.
5. Boström A.M., Wallin L., Nordström G. Research use in the care of older people: A survey among healthcare staff. Int J Older People Nurs 2006, 1:131-140.
6. Hirdes J.P., Mitchell L., Maxwell C.J., et al. Beyond the 'Iron Lungs of Gerontology': Using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in canada. Can J Aging 2011, 30:371-390.
7. Quest for Quality: An Inquiry into the Quality of Healthcare Support for Older People in Care Homes: A Call for Leadership, Partnership and Improvement 2011, British Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, London.
8. Estabrookes C.A., Squires J.E., Carleton H.L., et al. Who is looking after mom and dad? Unregulated workers in Canadian long-term care homes. Can J Aging 2015, 32:47-59.
9. Berta W., Teare G.F., Gilbart E., et al. The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care: Factors that affect innovation adoption. Health Care Manage Rev 2005, 30:282-292.
10. Fleuren M., Wiefferink K., Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. Int J Qual Health Care 2004, 16:107-123.
11. Kaplan H.C., Brady P.W., Dritz M.C., et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: A systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010, 88:500-559.
12. Estabrooks C.A. Translating research into practice: Implications for organizations and administrators. Can J Nurs Res 2003, 35:53-68.
13. Glisson C. Assessing and changing organizational culture and climate for effective services. Res Soc Work Pract 2007, 17:736-747.
14. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., Macfarlane F., et al. Diffusion of innovation in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82:581-629.
15. Grol R.P., Bosch M.C., Hulscher M.E., et al. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: The use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 2007, 85:93-138.
16. Damschroder L., Aron D., Keith R., et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009, 4:50.
17. Kitson A., Harvey G., McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: A conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998, 7:149-158.
18. French B., Thomas L., Baker P., et al. What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context. Implement Sci 2009, 4:28.
19. Kaplan H.C., Provost L.P., Froehle C.M., et al. The model for understanding success in Quality (MUSIQ): Building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2012, 21:13-20.
20. Kitson A.L., Rycroft-Malone J., Harvey G., et al. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci 2008, 3:1.
21. Estabrooks C.A., Squires J.E., Cummings G.G., et al. Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC HSR 2009, 9:234.
22. McCormack B., McCarthy G., Wright J., et al. Development and testing of theContext Assessment Index (CAI). Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2009, 6:27-35.
23. McCormack B., Kitson A., Harvey G., et al. Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of 'context'. JAdv Nurs 2002, 38:94-104.
24. Ward V., Smith S., House A., et al. Exploring knowledge exchange: A useful framework for practice and policy. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:297-304.
25. Berta W., Teare G.F., Gilbart E., et al. Spanning the know-do gap: Understanding knowledge application and capacity in long-term care homes. Soc Sci Med 2010, 70:1326-1334.
26. Barnett J., Vasileiou K., Djemil F., et al. Understanding innovators' experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: A qualitative study. BMC HSR 2011, 11:342.
27. Cummings G.G., Estabrooks C.A., Midodzi W.K., et al. Influence of organizational characteristics and context on research utilization. Nurs Res 2007, 56:S24-S39.
28. Janssen M.A., van Achterberg T., Adriaansen M.J., et al. Factors influencing the implementation of the guideline triage in emergency departments: A qualitative study. JClin Nurs 2012, 21:437-447.
29. Pepler C.J., Edgar L., Frisch S., et al. Unit culture and research-based nursing practice in acute care. Can J Nurs Res 2005, 37:66-85.
30. Scott S.D., Estabrooks C.A., Allen M., et al. Acontext of uncertainty: How context shapes nurses' research utilization behaviors. Qual Health Res 2008, 18:347-357.
31. Estabrooks C.A., Midodzi W.K., Cummings G.G., et al. Predicting research use in nursing organizations: A multilevel analysis. Nurs Res 2007, 56:S7-S23.
32. Estabrooks C.A., Scott S., Squires J.E., et al. Patterns of research utilization on patient care units. Implement Sci 2008, 3:31.
33. Denison D.R. What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Acad Manage Rev 1996, 21:619-654.
34. Dopson S. Aview from organizational studies. Nurs Res 2007, 56:S72-S77.
35. Glisson C. The organizational context of children's mental health services. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2002, 5:233-253.
36. Hofstede G. Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Org Stud 1998, 19:477-493.
37. Lopez R., Amella E.J., Strumpf N.E., et al. The influence of nursing home culture on the use of feeding tubes. Arch Intern Med 2010, 170:83-88.
38. Bonner A.F., Castle N.G., Men A., et al. Certified nursing assistants' perceptions of nursing home patient safety culture: Is there a relationship to clinical outcomes?. JAm Med Dir Assoc 2009, 10:11-20.
39. Svarstad B.L., Mount J.K., Bigelow W. Variations in the treatment culture of nursing homes and responses to regulations to reduce drug use. Psychiatr Serv 2001, 52:666-672.
40. van Beek A.P., Gerritsen D.L. The relationship between organizational culture of nursing staff and quality of care for residents with dementia: Questionnaire surveys and systematic observations in nursing homes. Int J Nurs Stud 2010, 47:1274-1282.
41. Estabrooks C.A., Hutchinson A.M., Squires J.E., et al. Translating research in elder care: An introduction to a study protocol series. Implement Sci 2009, 4:51.
42. Estabrooks C.A., Squires J.E., Cummings G.G., et al. Study protocol for the translating research in elder care (TREC): Building context-An organizational monitoring program in long-term care project (project 1). Implement Sci 2009, 4:52.
43. Squires J.E., Hutchinson A.M., Bostrom A.M., et al. Adata quality control programfor computer-assisted personal interviews. Nurs Res Pract 2012, 2012:303816.
44. Estabrooks C.A. The conceptual structure of research utilization. Nurs Res Health 1999, 22:203-216.
45. Estabrooks C., Squires J., Hayduk L., et al. Advancing the argument for validity of the Alberta Context Tool with healthcare aides in residential long-term care. BMC MRM 2011, 11:107.
46. Squires J., Hutchinson A., Bostrom A.M., et al. To what extent do nurses use research in clinical practice? A systematic review. Implement Sci 2011, 6:21.
47. Squires J.E., Estabrooks C.A., O'Rourke H.M., et al. Asystematic review of the psychometric properties of self-report research utilization measures used in healthcare. Implement Sci 2011, 8:83.
48. Squires J., Estabrooks C., Newburn-Cook C., et al. Validation of the conceptual research utilization scale: An application of the standards for educational and psychological testing in healthcare. BMC HSR 2011, 11:107.
49. Squires J.E., Estabrooks C.A., Hayduk L., et al. Precision of the conceptual research utilization scale. JNurs Meas 2014, 22:145-163.
50. Estabrooks C., Squires J., Cummings G., et al. Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC HSR 2009, 9:234.
51. Squires J.E., Hayduk L., Hutchinson A.M., et al. Aprotocol for advanced psychometric assessment of surveys. Nurs Res Pract 2013, 2013. Article ID 156782.
52. Barnett R.C., Brennan R.T., Gareis K.C. Acloser look at the measurement of burnout. JAppl Biobehav Res 1999, 4:65-78.
53. Beckstead J.W. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Florida nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2002, 39:785-792.
54. Maslach Burnout Inventory 1996, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, Palo Alto, California. 3rd ed. C. Maslach, S.E. Jackson, M.P. Leiter (Eds.).
55. Ware J., Kosinski M., Dewey J., et al. How to Score and Interpret Single-Item Health Status Measures: A Manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey 2001, QualyMetric, Boston, MA.
56. Lacey E.A. Research utilization in nursing practice-A pilot study. JAdv Nurs 1994, 19:987-995.
57. Estabrooks C.A. Research utilization in nursing: An examination of formal structure and influencing factors [Dissertation] 1997, University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, AB.
58. Estabrooks C.A. Modeling the individual determinants of research utilization. West J Nurs Res 1999, 21:758-772.
59. Lizarondo L., Grimmer-Somers K., Kumar S. Asystematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health. JMultidiscip Healthc 2011, 4:261-272.
60. Squires J., Estabrooks C.A., Gustavsson P., et al. Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: A systematic review update. Implement Sci 2011, 6:1.
61. Estabrooks C., Morgan D., Squires J., et al. The care unit in nursing home research: Evidence in support of a definition. BMC MRM 2011, 11:46.
62. Norton P.G., Murray M., Doupe M.B., et al. Facility versus unit level reporting of quality indicators in nursing homes when performance monitoring is the goal. BMJ Open 2014, 4:e004488.
63. Cummings G., Hutchinson A., Scott S., et al. The relationship between characteristics of context and research utilization in a pediatric setting. BMC HSR 2010, 10:168.
64. Squires J., Estabrooks C., Scott S., et al. The influence of organizational context on the use of research by nurses in Canadian pediatric hospitals. BMC HSR 2013, 13:351.
65. Altemeyer R. The Authoritarian Specter 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. Briggs Myers I. Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type 1995, Davies-Black, Mountain View, CA.
67. Riechmann S.W., Grasha A.F. Arational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. JPsychol 1974, 87:213-223.
68. Thompson C., Bucknall T., Estabrookes C.A., et al. Nurses' critical event risk assessments: A judgement analysis. JClin Nurs 2009, 18:601-612.
69. Thompson C., Cullum N., McCaughan D., et al. Nurses, information use, and clinical decision making-the real world potential for evidence-based decisions in nursing. Evid Based Nurs 2004, 7:68-72.
70. Elstein A.S., Schwarz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: Selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ 2002, 324:729-732.
71. Kassirer J.P., Wong J.B., Kopelman R.I. Learning Clinical Reasoning 2009, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York.
72. Facione N.C., Facione P.A., Sanchez C.A. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. JNurs Educ 1994, 33:345-350.
73. Profetto-McGrath J., Hesketh K.L., Lang S., et al. Astudy of critical thinking and research utilization among nurses. West J Nurs Res 2003, 25:322-337.
74. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.