Study protocol for the translating research in elder care (TREC): Building context - An organizational monitoring program in long-term care project (project one)

Implementation Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Estabrooks, Carole A ^a   Squires, Janet E ^a   Cummings, Greta G ^a   Teare, Gary F ^b,c   Norton, Peter G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Health Quality Council   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349226980     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-52     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Translating Research in Elder Care: An introduction to a study protocol series. CA Estabrooks AM Hutchinson JE Squires JM Birdsell L Degner AE Sales PG Norton, Implement Sci 2009 4 1 51 10.1186/1748-5908-4-51 19664285
2. Study protocol for the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC): Building Context Through Case Studies in Long-Term Care Project (Project 2). J Rycroft-Malone S Dopson L Degner AM Hutchinson CA Estabrooks, Implement Sci 2009 4 1 53 10.1186/1748-5908-4-53 19671167
3. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: The use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. M Eccles J Grimshaw A Walker M Johnston N Pitts, J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 107 112 15680740 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2004.09.002 (Pubitemid 40174916)
4. A guide to knowledge translation theory. CA Estabrooks DS Thompson JJ Lovely A Hofmeyer, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006 26 25 36 16557511 10.1002/chp.48
5. Models, strategies, and tools: Theory in implementing evidence-based findings into health care practice. A Sales J Smith G Curran L Kochevar, J Gen Intern Med. 2006 21 Suppl 2 43 S49 16637956
6. EM Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations New York: Free Press 5 2003
7. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? ID Graham J Logan MB Harrison SE Straus J Tetroe W Caswell N Robinson, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006 26 13 24 16557505 10.1002/chp.47
8. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: A conceptual framework. A Kitson G Harvey B McCormack, Qual Saf Health Care 1998 7 149 158 10.1136/qshc.7.3.149
9. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? J Rycroft-Malone K Seers A Titchen G Harvey A Kitson B McCormack, J Adv Nurs 2004 47 81 90 15186471 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03068.x (Pubitemid 38859940)
10. Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of 'context'. B McCormack A Kitson G Harvey J Rycroft-Malone A Titchen K Seers, J Adv Nurs 2002 38 94 104 11895535 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02150.x
11. Getting evidence into practice: The role and function of facilitation. G Harvey A Loftus-Hills J Rycroft-Malone A Titchen A Kitson B McCormack K Seers, J Adv Nurs 2002 37 577 588 11879422 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02126.x
12. The extent of nursing research utilization in general medical and surgical wards. SE Rodgers, J Adv Nurs 2000 32 182 193 10886450 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01416.x
13. Swedish midwives' awareness of, attitudes to and use of selected research findings. AC Berggren, J Adv Nurs 1996 23 462 470 8655820 10.1111/j.1365-2648. 1996.tb00007.x
14. Factors affecting the utilization of systematic reviews: A study of public health decision makers. M Dobbins R Cockerill J Barnsley, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001 17 203 214 11446132 10.1017/S0266462300105069 (Pubitemid 32574958)
15. Diffusion of pain management research into nursing practice. P Dooks, Cancer Nurs 2001 24 99 103 11318267 10.1097/00002820-200104000-00004
16. Public health nursing practice guidelines: An evaluation of dissemination and use. B Lia-Hoagberg M Schaffer S Strohschein, Public Health Nurs 1999 16 397 404 10620249 10.1046/j.1525-1446.1999.00397.x
17. Dissemination and use of research findings in nursing practice. Y Michel NV Sneed, J Prof Nurs 1995 11 306 311 7593975 10.1016/S8755-7223(05)80012-2
18. Clinical nurse educators as agents for change: Increasing research utilization. MF Milner CA Estabrooks C Humphrey, Int J Nurs Stud 2005 42 899 914 16210028 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.11.006 (Pubitemid 41413331)
19. Use of research-based practices by oncology staff nurses. DN Rutledge P Greene K Mooney LM Nail M Ropka, Oncol Nurs Forum 1996 23 1235 1244 8883071
20. Factors affecting acute-care nurses' use of research findings. C Varcoe A Hilton, Can J Nurs Res 1995 27 51 71 8697274
21. Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for childbirth. J Lomas, Milbank Q 1993 71 439 475 8413070 10.2307/3350410
22. Changing provider behavior: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. JM Grimshaw L Shirran R Thomas G Mowatt C Fraser L Bero R Grilli E Harvey A Oxman MA O'Brien, Med Care 2001 39 I-2 II-45 10.1097/00005650- 200108002-00002
23. Is the involvement of opinion leaders in the implementation of research findings a feasible strategy? JM Grimshaw MP Eccles J Greener G Maclennan T Ibbotson JP Kahan F Sullivan, Implement Sci 2006 1 3 16722572 10.1186/1748-5908-1-3
24. Local opinion leaders: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. MA Thomson O'Brien AD Oxman RB Haynes DA Davis N Freemantle EL Harvey, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004 D000125
25. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. JM Grimshaw RE Thomas G MacIennan CR Fraser L Vale P Whity MP Eccles L Matowe L Shirran M Wensing R Dikstra C Donaldson A Hutchison, Health Technol Assess 2004 8 1 72
26. Getting research findings into practice: Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. LA Bero R Grilli JM Grimshaw E Harvey AD Oxman MA Thomson Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group, BMJ 1998 317 465 468 9703533
27. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. G Jamtvedt JM Young DT Kristoffersen MA O'Brien AD Oxman, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 D000259 16625533
28. Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research, and practice. J Sapyta M Riemer L Bickman, J Clin Psychol 2005 61 145 153 15609360 10.1002/jclp.20107 (Pubitemid 40289028)
29. Changing physicians' behavior: What works and thoughts on getting more things to work. JM Grimshaw MP Eccles AE Walker RE Thomas, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002 22 237 243 12613059 10.1002/chp.1340220408
30. Research utilization: Making the link to practice. J Bostrom WN Suter, J Nurs Staff Dev 1993 9 28 34 8301381
31. Variables related to research utilization in nursing: An empirical investigation. VL Champion A Leach, J Adv Nurs 1989 14 705 710 2778207 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01634.x
32. Innovation adoption behavior among nurses. LA Coyle AG Sokop, Nurs Res 1990 39 176 180 2342906 10.1097/00006199-199005000-00016
33. Valuing research in clinical practice: A basis for developing a strategic plan for nursing research. L Butler, Can J Nurs Res 1995 27 33 39 8697272
34. The employment of ward opinion leaders for continuing education in the hospital. SW Hong TY Ching JP Fung WL Seto, Med Teach 1990 12 209 217 2079896 10.3109/01421599009006698
35. The effect of staff nurse participation in a clinical nursing research project on attitude towards, access to, support of and use of research in the acute care setting. JE Tranmer J Lochhaus-Gerlach M Lam, Can J Nurs Leadersh 2002 15 18 26 11908539
36. Nurses' participation and utilization of research in the Republic of China. S-L Tsai, Int J Nurs Stud 2000 37 435 444 10785534 10.1016/S0020-7489(00) 00023-7
37. A study of the utilization of research in practice and the influence of education. SE Rodgers, Nurse Educ Today 2000 20 279 287 10827099 10.1054/nedt.1999.0395
38. A diffusion survey of coronary precautions. KT Kirchhoff, Nurs Res 1982 31 196 201 6980400 10.1097/00006199-198207000-00002
39. A study of critical thinking and research utilization among nurses. J Profetto-McGrath KL Hesketh S Lang CA Estabrooks, West J Nurs Res 2003 25 322 337 12705114 10.1177/0193945902250421 (Pubitemid 38560965)
40. Changing nurses' pain assessment practice: A collaborative research utilization approach. MA Dufault C Bielecki E Collins C Willey, J Adv Nurs 1995 21 634 645 7797697 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21040634.x
41. Individual determinants of research utilization: A systematic review. CA Estabrooks JA Floyd S Scott-Findlay KA O'Leary M Gushta, J Adv Nurs 2003 43 506 520 12919269 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02748.x (Pubitemid 37260240)
42. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. F Damanpour, J Manag 1987 13 675 688 10.1177/014920638701300408
43. Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. F Damanpour, Manage Sci 1996 42 693 716 10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693
44. Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. A Meyer J Goes, Acad Manage Rev 1988 31 897 923 10.2307/256344
45. Determinants of innovation in organizations. L Mohr, Am Polit Sci Rev 1969 63 111 126 10.2307/1954288
46. The diffusion and adoption of worksite health promotion innovations: An analysis of barriers. M Orlandi, Prev Med 1986 15 522 536 3774782 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90028-9 (Pubitemid 16023266)
47. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. J Kimberly M Evanisko, Acad Manage J 1981 24 689 713 10253688 10.2307/256170
48. The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption. R Germain, Bus Res 1996 35 117 127 10.1016/0148-2963(95) 00053-4 (Pubitemid 126159605)
49. Organizational integrative mechanisms and adoption of innovations by nurses. JLL Brett, Nurs Res 1989 38 105 110 2928144
50. Champions of change: Identifying understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. J Howell C Higgins, Organ Dyn 1990 19 40 55 10.1016/0090-2616(90)90047-S
51. Champions and antagonists: Relationships with R&D project characteristics and management. S Markham S Green R Basu, J Eng Tech Manag 1991 8 217 242 10.1016/0923-4748(91)90012-G
52. Champions for radical new inventions. D Schon, Harv Bus Rev 1963 41 77 86
53. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. G Downs L Mohr, Adm Sci Q 1976 21 700 714 10.2307/2391725
54. Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. S Scott R Bruce, Acad Manage J 1994 37 580 607 10.2307/256701
55. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. F Damanpour, Acad Manage J 1991 34 555 590 10.2307/256406
56. Factors encouraging and discouraging the use of nursing research findings. MM Pettengill DA Gillies CC Clark, Image J Nurs Sch 1994 26 143 147 8063322 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00934.x
57. Are midwives using research evidence in practice? Y Richens, Br J Midwifery 2001 9 237 242
58. An exploratory study of research utilization by nurses in general medical and surgical wards. S Rodgers, J Adv Nurs 1994 20 904 911 7538155 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20050904.x
59. The contribution of longitudinal studies for understanding science communication and research utilization. T Tyden, Sci Commun 1996 18 29 48 10.1177/1075547096018001002
60. Using research for practice: A UK experience of the BARRIERS Scale. V Dunn N Crichton B Roe K Seers K Williams, J Adv Nurs 1997 26 1203 1210 9429972 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1997.tb00814.x
61. Barriers to research implementation by community nurses. JM Griffiths RM Bryar SJ Closs J Cooke T Hostick S Kelly K Marshall, Br J Community Nurs 2001 6 501 510 11832808
62. Overcoming barriers to research utilization with researched-based practice guidelines. PA Mayhew, Medsurg Nurs 1993 2 336 337 8348193
63. Barriers to using research evidence in nursing practice. A Retsas, J Adv Nurs 2000 31 599 606 10718879 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01315.x
64. Pre- and post-test evaluation of a project to facilitate research development in practice in a hospital setting. C Clifford S Murray, J Adv Nurs 2001 36 685 695 11737501 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02033.x (Pubitemid 33609504)
65. Implementing evidence-based practice: Factors that influence the use of research evidence by occupational therapists. D Humphris P Littlejohns C Victor P O'Halloran J Peacock, Br J Occup Ther 2000 63 516 522
66. Evaluation of a system for providing information resources to nurses. JA Royle J Blythe A DiCenso S Boblin-Cummings R Deber R Hayward, Health Informatics J 2000 5 100 109 10.1177/146045820000600208
67. Promoting research-based nursing: The nurse administrator's role. EA Hefferin JA Horsley MR Ventura, J Nurs Adm 1982 12 34 41 6924960
68. Barriers to using research findings in practice: The clinician's perspective. SG Funk MT Champagne RA Wiese EM Tornquist, Appl Nurs Res 1991 4 90 95 1741642
69. A survey of research-related activities and perceived barriers to research utilization among professional oncology nurses. JR Walczak DB McGuire ME Haisfield A Beezley, Oncol Nurs Forum 1994 21 710 715 8047469
70. Predictors of nurses' involvement in research activities. C Rizzuto J Bostrom W Newton Suter WC Chenitz, West J Nurs Res 1994 16 193 204 8203139 10.1177/019394599401600206
71. A survey of variables related to research utilization in nursing practice in the acute care setting. S Hatcher J Tranmer, Can J Nurs Adm 1997 10 31 53 9355284
72. Research on Aging: Providing Evidence for Rescuing the Canadian Health Care System. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/10519.html
73. Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. J Rycroft-Malone A Kitson G Harvey B McCormack K Seers A Titchen C Estabrooks, Qual Saf Health Care 2002 11 174 180 12448812 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174
74. CA Estabrooks JE Squires AM Adachi L Kong PG Norton, Utilization of Health Research in Acute Care Settings in Alberta Technical Report Edmonton: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta 2008 Report No. 08-01-TR
75. A comparison of research utilization among nurses working in Canadian civilian and United States Army healthcare settings. CA Estabrooks DJ Kenny GG Cummings AJ Adewale AA Mallidou, Res Nurs Health 2007 30 282 296 17514725 10.1002/nur.20218
76. Patterns of research utilization on patient care units. CA Estabrooks S Scott JE Squires B Stevens L O'Brien-Pallas J Watt-Watson J Profetto-McGrath K McGilton K Golden-Biddle J Lander G Donner G Boschma CK Humphrey J Williams, Implement Sci 2008 3 31 18518966 10.1186/1748-5908-3-31
77. The conceptual structure of research utilization. CA Estabrooks, Res Nurs Health 1999 22 3 203 216 http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/61004138/ abstract 10344701 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199906)22:3<203::AID-NUR3>3.0. CO;2-9
78. Research utilization in nursing practice - a pilot study. EA Lacey, J Adv Nurs 1994 19 987 995 8056929 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01178.x
79. Research utilization in nursing: An examination of formal structure and influencing factors. CA Estabrooks, Dissertation Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing 1997
80. Modeling the individual determinants of research utilization. CA Estabrooks, West J Nurs Res 1999 21 758 772 11512212 10.1177/01939459922044171
81. PP Heppner, The Problem Solving Inventory (PSI): Research Manual Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press 1988
82. The measurement of experienced burnout. C Maslach SE Jackson, J Occup Behav 1981 2 99 10.1002/job.4030020205
83. C Maslach SE Jackson MP Leiter, Maslach Burnout Inventory Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc 3 1996
84. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Florida nurses. JW Beckstead, Int J Nurs Stud 2002 39 785 792 12379296 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00012-3 (Pubitemid 40433332)
85. Adult measures of quality of life. A Carr, Arthritis Rheum 2003 49 113 S133 10.1002/art.11414
86. P Giovannetti CA Estabrooks KL Hesketh, Alberta Nurse Survey Final Report Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing 2002 Report No. 02-01-TR
87. Nurses' experience of violence in Alberta and British Columbia hospitals. SM Duncan K Hyndman CA Estabrooks K Hesketh CK Humphrey JS Wong S Acorn P Giovannetti, Can J Nurs Res 2001 32 57 78 11928302
88. Workplace violence in Alberta and British Columbia hospitals. KL Hesketh SM Duncan CA Estabrooks MA Reimer P Giovannetti K Hyndman S Acorn, Health Policy 2003 63 311 321 12595130 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00142-2 (Pubitemid 36197698)
89. Targeting and quality of nursing home care. A five-nation study. GI Carpenter JP Hirdes MW Ribbe N Ikegami D Challis K Steel R Bernabei B Fries, Aging (Milano) 1999 11 83 89 10386167
90. Quality control in nursing homes. JP Hirdes, Can Med Assoc J 1999 161 127
91. Integrated health information systems based on the RAI/MDS series of instruments. JP Hirdes BE Fries JN Morris K Steel V Mor D Frijters S LaBine C Schalm MJ Stones G Teare T Smith M Marhaba E Perez P Jonsson, Healthc Manage Forum 1999 12 30 40 10788069
92. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. JN Morris C Hawes BE Fries CD Phillips V Mor S Katz K Murphy ML Drugovich AS Friedlob, Gerontologist 1990 30 293 307 2354790
93. Effect of the National Resident Assessment Instrument on selected health conditions and problems. BE Fries C Hawes JN Morris CD Phillips V Mor PS Park, J Am Geriatr Soc 1997 45 994 1001 9256854
94. Approaching cross-national comparisons of nursing home residents. BE Fries M Schroll C Hawes R Gilgen PV Jonsson P Park, Age Ageing 1997 26 13 18 9464549 (Pubitemid 28017641)
95. A commitment to change: revision of HCFA's RAI. JN Morris S Nonemaker K Murphy C Hawes BE Fries V Mor C Phillips, J Am Geriatr Soc 1997 45 1011 1016 9256856
96. Reliability estimates for the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). C Hawes JN Morris CD Phillips V Mor BE Fries S Nonemaker, Gerontologist 1995 35 172 178 7750773
97. Addressing the health needs of frail elderly people: Ontario's experience with an integrated health information system. JP Hirdes, Age Ageing 2006 35 329 331 16788076 10.1093/ageing/afl036 (Pubitemid 43941797)
98. Pain in U.S. nursing homes: validating a pain scale for the minimum data set. BE Fries SE Simon JN Morris C Flodstrom FL Bookstein, Gerontologist 2001 41 173 179 11327482
99. Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer: SAGE Study Group: Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Drug Use via Epidemiology. R Bernabei G Gambassi K Lapane F Landi C Gatsonis R Dunlop L Lipsitz K Steel V Mor, JAMA 1998 279 1877 1882 9634258 10.1001/jama.279.23.1877 (Pubitemid 28299283)
100. The validity of the Minimum Data Set in measuring the cognitive impairment of persons admitted to nursing homes. AS Gruber-Baldini E Zimmerman E Mortimore J Magaziner, J Am Geriatr Soc 2000 48 1601 1606 11129749
101. Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: Agreement with the mini-mental state examination. SL Hartmaier PD Sloane HA Guess GG Koch CM Mitchell CD Phillips, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995 50 128 133 7874589
102. Psychometric characteristics of the minimum data set II: Validity. MP Lawton R Casten PA Parmelee K Van Haitsma J Corn MH Kleban, J Am Geriatr Soc 1998 46 736 744 9625190
103. Inter-rater reliability of nursing home quality indicators in the U.S. V Mor J Angelelli R Jones J Roy T Moore J Morris, BMC Health Serv Res 2003 3 20 14596684 10.1186/1472-6963-3-20
104. Health-related quality of life measure based on the minimum data set. WP Wodchis JP Hirdes DH Feeny, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003 19 490 506 12962335 10.1017/S0266462303000424 (Pubitemid 38649117)
105. AM Hutchinson A-M Adachi L Kong CA Estabrooks B Stevens, Context and Research Use in the Care of Children: A Pilot Study Edmonton, AB: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta 2008 Report No. 08-03-TR
106. Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. TAB Snijders, Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science Chicester: Wiley, Everitt BS, Howell DC, 2005 3 1570 1573
107. Predicting research use in nursing organizations: A multilevel analysis. CA Estabrooks WK Midodzi GG Cummings L Wallin, Nurs Res 2007 56 7 23 17625477 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280647.18806.98
108. The impact of hospital nursing characteristics on 30-day mortality. CA Estabrooks WK Midodzi GG Cummings KL Ricker P Giovannetti, Nurs Res 2005 54 74 84 15778649 10.1097/00006199-200503000-00002
109. Nooro Online Research. http://www.nooro.com/
110. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. J Logan ID Graham, Sci Commun 1998 20 227 246 10.1177/1075547098020002004
111. JA Horsley J Crane MK Crabtree DJ Wood, Using Research to Improve Nursing Practice: A Guide San Francisco: Grune & Stratton 1983
112. Utilization of nursing research: The planning process. JC Krueger, J Nurs Adm 1978 8 6 9 245387
113. Updating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. CB Stetler, Nurs Outlook 2001 49 272 279 11753294 10.1067/mno.2001.120517 (Pubitemid 33602068)
114. The Iowa Model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. MG Titler C Kleiber VJ Steelman BA Rakel G Budreau LQ Everett KC Buckwalter T Tripp-Reimer CJ Goode, Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2001 13 497 509 11778337
115. The many meanings of research utilization. C Weiss, Public Adm Rev 1979 39 426 431 10.2307/3109916
116. Organizational innovation. R Daft S Becker, Innovation in Organizations New York: Elsevier 1978 3 213
117. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. R Daft, Acad Manage J 1978 21 193 210 10.2307/255754
118. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical-modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. E Abrahamson L Rosenkopf, Acad Manage Rev 1993 18 487 517 10.2307/258906
119. A "desperation-reaction" model of medical diffusion. K Warner, Health Serv Res 1975 10 369 383 1065622
120. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. E Romanelli M Tushman, Acad Manage J 1994 37 1141 1166 10.2307/256669
121. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. WJ Orlikowski, Inform Syst Res 1996 7 63 92 10.1287/isre.7.1.63
122. Agency theory: An assessment and review. K Eisenhardt, Acad Manage Rev 1989 14 57 75 10.2307/258191
123. Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and micro-processes of change. T Reay K Golden-Biddle K GermAnn, Acad Manage J 2006 49 977 998