Educational interventions to improve cytology visual diagnostic reasoning measured by eye tracking

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 69-78

  Warren, Amy L ^a   Donnon, Tyrone L ^b   Wagg, Catherine R ^a   Priest, Heather ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical pathology; Diagnostic reasoning; Expertise; Eye tracking; Teaching and learning

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; THINKING;

ALBERTA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; THINKING;

EID: 84929941053     PISSN: 0748321X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/jvme.0514-056R     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, et al, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann; 2008.
2. Sharkey LC, Dial SM, Matz ME. Maximizing the diagnostic value of cytology in small animal practice. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2007;37(2):351-72.
3. Hamilton PW, van Diest PJ, Williams R, et al. Do we see what we think we see? The complexities of morphological assessment. J Pathol. 2009;218(3):285-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.2527. Medline:19291709.
4. Crowley RS, Naus GJ, Stewart J III, et al. Development of visual diagnostic expertise in pathology: An information-processing study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):39-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1123. Medline:12509356.
5. Norman GR, Coblentz CL, Brooks LR, et al. Expertise in visual diagnosis: A review of the literature. Acad Med. 1992;67(10 Suppl):S78-S83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199210000-00045. Medline:1388563.
6. Sloman SA. Two systems of reasoning. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, editors. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 379-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.024.
7. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol. 2003;58(9):697-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697. Medline:14584987.
8. Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1022-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace703. Medline:19638766.
9. Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: The role of experience. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1140-5. Medline:18004990.
10. Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al. An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: The dual-process theory. Med Educ Online. 2011;16(5890):1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.5890. Medline:21430797.
11. Kahneman D, Frederick S. A model of heuristic judgment. In: Holyoak K, Morrison RG, editors. The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 267-94.
12. Norman GR, Trott AD, Brooks LR, et al. Cognitive differences in clinical reasoning related to postgraduate training. Teach Learn Med. 1994;6(2):114-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401339409539657.
13. Moulton CA, Regehr G, Lingard L, et al. Slowing down to stay out of trouble in the operating room: remaining attentive in automaticity. Acad Med. 2010;85(10):1571-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f073dd. Medline:20881677.
14. Evans JS. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59(1):255-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629. Medline:18154502.
15. Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. 2nd ed. Boston: MIT Press; 1993.
16. Russo JE, Johnson EJ, Stephens DL. The validity of verbal protocols. Mem Cognit. 1989;17(6):759-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03202637. Medline:2811673.
17. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Conant EF, et al. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology. 2007;242(2):396-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051997. Medline:17255410.
18. Hoffman JE. Visual attention and eye movements. In: Pashler H, editor. Attention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 119-53.
19. Krupinski EA, Tillack AA, Richter L, et al. Eyemovement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: Implications for medical education and differences with experience. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(12):1543-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.024. Medline:17129792.
20. Tiersma ES, Peters AA, Mooij HA, et al. Visualising scanning patterns of pathologists in the grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56(9):677-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.56.9.677 Medline:12944551.
21. Warren AL. Novice and expert differences and educational interventions to improve veterinary pathology visual diagnostic reasoning measured by eyetracking technology. Calgary: Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary; 2013. Available from: http://theses.ucalgary.ca//handle/11023/1193.
22. Durning SJ, Artino AR, Boulet JR, et al. The impact of selected contextual factors on experts' clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(1):65-79. Medline:21505841.
23. Lee A, Joynt GM, Lee AK, et al. Using illness scripts to teach clinical reasoning skills to medical students. Fam Med. 2010;42(4):255-61. Medline:20373168.
24. Bloch RF, Hofer D, Feller S, et al. The role of strategy and redundancy in diagnostic reasoning. BMC Med Educ. 2003;3(1):1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-3-1. Medline:12542839.
25. Kassirer JP. Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached. Acad Med. 2010;85(7):1118-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d5dd0d. Medline:20603909.
26. Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):98-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x. Medline:15612906.
27. Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ. 2005;39(4):418-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02127.x. Medline:15813765.
28. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HP. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med. 2000;75(2):182-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200002000-00020. Medline:10693854.
29. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(21):2217- 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054782. Medline:17124019.
30. Mayer R. Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learn Instr. 2010;20(2):167-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.012.
31. Mayer RE, Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38(1):43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801-6.
32. Boucheix J-M, Lowe RK. An eye-tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learn Instr. 2010;20(2):123-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015.
33. Jarodzka H, Scheiter K, Gerjets P, et al. In the eyes of the beholder: how experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learn Instr. 2010;20(2):146-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.019.
34. Ginns P. Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learn Instr. 2005;15(4):313-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001.
35. Raskin RE. Skin and subcutaneous tissues. In: Raskin RE, Meyer DJ, editors. Canine and feline cytology: A color atlas and interpretation guide. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2010. p. 26-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-141604985-2.50008-6.
36. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1991.
37. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
38. Evered A, Walker D, Watt AA, et al. To what extent does nonanalytic reasoning contribute to visual learning in cytopathology? Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(6):329-38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21263. Medline:23389823.
39. Catrambone R, Holyoak KJ. Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989;15(6):1147-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147.
40. Grant ER, Spivey MJ. Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(5):462-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02454. Medline:12930477.
41. van Merriënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x. Medline:20078759.
42. Norman G. Teaching basic science to optimize transfer. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):807-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590903049814. Medline:19811185.