To what extent does nonanalytic reasoning contribute to visual learning in cytopathology?

Cancer Cytopathology

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 329-338

  Evered, Andrew ^a,b   Walker, Darren ^b   Watt, Andrew A ^b   Perham, Nick ^b  

^a Magden Park   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognition; Cytopathology; Pattern recognition; Perceptual learning; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC REASONING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDY SKILLS; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; VISUAL LEARNING; CAMERA; CELL DAMAGE; CERVICAL CYTOMORPHOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN CELL; IMAGING SOFTWARE; LEARNING STYLE; MICROSCOPE; PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SKILL; ADOLESCENT; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CYTODIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASMS, SQUAMOUS CELL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROGNOSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881530616     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19346638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21263     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Evered A. Abnormal cervical cytology. In: Shambayati B, editor. Fundamentals of Biomedical Science: Cytopathology. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 2011:108-135.
2. Mitchell H, Medley G. Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology. 1995;6:368-375. (Pubitemid 26021207)
3. Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histological interpretations. JAMA. 2001;285:1500-1505.
4. Evered A. What can cytologists learn from 25 years of investigations in visual search? Br J Biomed Sci. 2005;62:182-192. (Pubitemid 41811300)
5. Qualifications and training for non-medical laboratory staff. Sheffield, UK: NHS Cervical Screening Programme. (NHSCSP Publication No 12); 1995.
6. Level 3 Diploma in Cervical Cytology Centre Resource Pack. London, UK: City and Guilds; 2007.
7. Melamed MR, Hutchinson ML, Kaufman, EA, et al. Evaluation of costs and benefits of advances in cytologic technology. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic cytology towards the 21st Century: an international expert conference and tutorial. Acta Cytol. 1998;42:69-75.
8. Nodine C, Mello-Thoms C. The role of expertise in radiologic image interpretation. In: Samei E, Krupinski E, editors. The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010:139-156.
9. Polanyi M. The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy. 1966;41:1-18.
10. Goldman GM. The tacit dimension of clinical judgment. Yale J Biol Med. 1990;63:47-61. (Pubitemid 20186952)
11. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1986.
12. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. Primer on cognition for medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:324-343.
13. Medin DL, Alton MW, Murphy TD. Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. J Exp Psychol Learn. 1984;10:333-352.
14. Brooks LR, Norman GR, Allen SW. Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991;120:278-287.
15. Hatala RM, Norman GR, Brooks LR. The impact of a clinical scenario upon electrocardiographic interpretation. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:126-129. (Pubitemid 29095930)
16. Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, Charlin B. An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory. Med Educ Online. 2011;16. doi:10.3402/meo.v16i0.5890.
17. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: a perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Am Psychol. 2002;58:697-720.
18. Evans JSBT. In two minds: dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:454-459.
19. Evans JSBT. Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-278.
20. Evans JSBT. Intuition and reasoning: a dual-process perspective. Psychol Inq. 2010;21:313-326.
21. Navon D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol. 1977;9:353-383.
22. Kundell HL, Nodine CF. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology. 1975;116:527-532.
23. Joseph GM, Patel VL. Domain knowledge and hypothesis generation in diagnostic reasoning. Med Decis Making. 1990;10:31-46. (Pubitemid 20086095)
24. Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:449-454. (Pubitemid 43122421)
25. Cave KR, Batty MJ. From searching for features to searching for threat: drawing the boundary between preattentive and attentive vision. Vis Cogn. 2006;14:629-646. (Pubitemid 44028009)
26. Taylor PM. A review of research into the development of radiologic expertise: implications for computer-based training. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:1252-1263. (Pubitemid 47432758)
27. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA, Mello-Thoms C. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:881-886. (Pubitemid 352033548)
28. Ark TK, Brooks LR, Eva KW. Giving learners the best of both worlds: Do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Acad Med. 2006;81:405-409. (Pubitemid 44270819)
29. Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2004;39:98-106.
30. Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, Charlin B. An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory. Med Educ Online. 2011;16:10.3402/meo.v16i0.5890.
31. Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Non-analytic models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience. Med Educ. 2007;41:1140-1145. (Pubitemid 350197065)
32. Burgess AE. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. Med Phys. 1995;22:643-655.
33. Aldridge RB, Glodzik D, Ballerini L, Fisher RB, Rees JL. Utility of non-rule-based visual matching as a strategy to allow novices to achieve skin lesion diagnosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91:279-283.
34. Girardi S, Gaudy C, Gouvernet J, Teston J, Richard MA, Grob JJ. Superiority of a cognitive education with photographs over ABCD criteria in the education of the general population to the early detection of melanoma: a randomized study. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2276-2280.
35. Brown NH, Robertson KM, Bisset YC, Rees JL. Using a structured image database, how well can novices assign skin lesion images to the correct diagnostic grouping? J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:2509-2512.
36. Fujita K, Crowley RS. The Virtual Slide Set - a curriculum development system for digital microscopy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:846.
37. Samei E, Li X. Logistical issues in designing perception experiments. In: Samei E, Krupinski E, editors. The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010:177-186.
38. Evans KK, Tambouret RH, Evered A, Wilbur DC, Wolfe JM. Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists' error rates in screening for cervical cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135: 1557-1560.
39. Forster KI, Forster JC. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Meth Ins C. 2003;35:116-124. (Pubitemid 37545055)
40. Kundel HL. How to minimize perceptual error and maximize expertise in medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 2007a;6515:1-11. doi:10.1117/12.718061. (Pubitemid 47550576)
41. Foucar E. Diagnostic decision-making in anatomic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(suppl 1):S21-S33.
42. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69: 861-871. (Pubitemid 24365512)
43. Renshaw AA. Aspiration Cytology: A Pattern Recognition Approach. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
44. Kellman PJ, Garrigan P. Perceptual learning and human expertise. Phys Life Rev. 2009;6:53-84.
45. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Conant EF, Weinstein SP. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation. Radiology. 2007;242:396-402. (Pubitemid 46146192)
46. Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Non-analytic models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience. Med Educ. 2007;41:1140-1145. (Pubitemid 350197065)
47. Schenck U, Reuter B, Vohringer P. Investigation of the visual cytoscreening of conventional gynecologic smears. I. Analysis of slide movement. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1986;8:35-45. (Pubitemid 17184787)
48. Reuter B, Schenck U. Investigation of the visual cytoscreening of conventional gynecologic smears. II. Analysis of eye movement. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1986;8:210-218. (Pubitemid 17206977)
49. Evered A, Dudding N. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology. Cytopathology. 2011;22:82-87.
50. Ahissar M, Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:457-464. (Pubitemid 39265449)
51. Mackworth NH, Morandi AJ. The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Percept Psychophys. 1967;2:547-552.
52. Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1967.
53. Lesgold A, Rubinson H, Feltovich P, et al. Expertise in a complex skill: diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: Chi M, Glaser R, Far M, editors. The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988: 311-342.