Initial experience with the new york state breast density inform law at a community-based breast center

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 993-1000

  Destounis, Stamatia ^a   Arieno, Andrea ^a   Morgan, Renee ^a  

^a Doxy me Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast density; Breast ultrasound; Screening sonography

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TISSUE; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

BREAST DENSITY; BREAST SONOGRAPHY; BREAST ULTRASOUND; CANCER DETECTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; SCREENING MAMMOGRAM; SONOGRAPHIC EXAMINATIONS;

DIAGNOSIS;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84929911290     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: 15509613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.6.993     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1: 829-832.
2. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175.
3. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screendetected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1081-1087.
4. Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1261-1265.
5. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: Relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004; 230: 29-41.
6. Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA, et al. The California Breast Density Information Group: A collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology 2013; 269: 887-892.
7. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 227-236.
8. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299: 2151-2163.
9. Crystal P, Strano S, Shcharynski S, Koretz M. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol2003; 181: 177-182.
10. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review. Cancer 1995; 76: 626-630.
11. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dünser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000; 21: 325-336.
12. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: The importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1675-1679.
13. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: Initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012; 265: 59-69.
14. Parris T, Wakefield D, Frimmer H. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Breast J 2013; 19: 64-70.
15. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207: 191-199.
16. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221: 641-649.
17. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012; 307: 1394-1404.
18. Chae EY, Kim HH, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Kim H. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1573-1578.
19. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: Ultrasound. In:Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Atlas. 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2014.
20. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81: 1879-1886.
21. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 2004; 23: 1111-1130.