Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 167, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1261-1265

  Stomper, Paul C ^a   D'Souza, David J ^a   DiNitto, Patricia A ^a   Arredondo, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029907522     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911192     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1622-1629
2. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:670-675
3. Tabar L, Deun PB. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: risk indicator for breast cancer? JAMA 1982;247:185-189
4. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992;184:613-617
5. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Mravunac M. Mammographically occult breast cancer: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 1983;52:1810-1819
6. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Do age, breast density, and family history affect the sensitivity of first screening mammography? JAMA 1996;276:33-38
7. Garber JE, Smith BL. Management of the high-risk and the concerned patient. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S, eds. Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:323-333
8. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993;188:297-301
9. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493-501
10. Orel S, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlations. Radiology 1994;190:485-493
11. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;197:387-395
12. Khalkhali I, Cutrone JA, Mena IG, et al. Scintimammography: the complementary role of Tc-99m sestamibi prone breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Radiology 1995; 196: 421-426
13. Nieweg OE, Kim EE, Wong WH, et al. Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-deoxyglucose in the detection and staging of breast cancer. Cancer 1993;71:3920-3925
14. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981:20-27, 212-225
15. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR 1986; 146:661-663
16. Page DL, Winfield AC. The dense mammogram (editorial). AJR 1986;147:487-489
17. Fisher ER, Palekar A, Kim WS, Redmond C. The histopathology of mammographic patterns. Am J Clin Pathol 1978;69:421-426
18. Stomper PC, Penetrante RB, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, Blumenson LE, Stewart CC. Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S-phase percentage. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;37: 229-236
19. Swann CA, Kopans DB, McCarthy KA, White G, Hall DA. Mammographic density and physical assessment of the breast. AJR 1987;148:525-526
20. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 1982;32:194-225
21. Meyer JE, Kopans DB, Oot R. Breast cancer visualized by mammography in patients under 35. Radiology 1983;147:93-94
22. Shaw de Paredes E, Marsteller LP, Eden BV. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings. Radiology 1990;177:117-119
23. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 1991;180:831-835
24. Stomper PC, Van Voorhis BJ, Ravnikar VA, Meyer JE. Mammographic changes associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: a longitudinal study. Radiology 1990;174:487-490
25. Laya MB, Gallagher JC, Schreiman JS, Larson EB, Watson P, Weinstein L. Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern. Radiology 1995;196:433-437
26. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Khalid N. Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:1534-1540
27. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:657-661