Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of connecticut bill 458

Breast Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 64-70

  Parris, Tchaiko ^a   Wakefield, Dorothy ^b   Frimmer, Heather ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Connecticut Bill 458; dense breast; screening breast ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CYST ASPIRATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CONNECTICUT; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84872275469     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12053     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berg WA,. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 845-51.
2. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al,. American Cancer Society Guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75-89.
3. www.cga.ct.gov-Bill 458, Public Act No. 9-41. An act requiring communication of mammographic breast density information to patients, 2009.
4. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V,. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996; 276: 33-8.
5. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH,. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. RSNA 2002; 168: 165-75.
6. Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, et al,. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst (6 September 2006; 98: 1204-14.
7. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al,. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst (6 September 2006; 98: 1215-26.
8. Crystal P, Strano S, Shcharynski S, Koretz M,. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breast. AJR 2003; 181: 177-82.
9. Kaplan SS,. Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. RSNA 2001; 221: 641-9.
10. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, et al,. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2000; 21: 325-36.
11. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL,. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 1995; 76: 626-30.
12. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al,. Mammography and subsequent whole breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR 2003; 180: 1675-9.
13. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al,. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299: 2151-63.
14. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB,. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole breast US: Lesion detection and characterization. RSNA 2006; 241: 355-65.
15. Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, et al,. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006; 111: 440-8.
16. Madjar H,. Role of Breast Ultrasound for the Detection and differentiation of breast lesions. Breast Care 2010; 5: 109-14.
17. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH,. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207: 191-9.
18. Ruddy KJ, Partridge AH,. Breast cancer in young women: clinical decision-making in the face of uncertainty. Oncology 2009; 23: 474-7.
19. Feig S,. Cost effectiveness of mammography, mri and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening. Radiologic Clinic of North America 2010; 48: 879-91.