PANNZER: High-throughput functional annotation of uncharacterized proteins in an error-prone environment

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1544-1552

  Koskinen, Patrik ^a   Törönen, Petri ^a   Nokso Koivisto, Jussi ^a   Holm, Liisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

BIOLOGY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; DATA MINING; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATA MINING; DATABASES, GENETIC; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENE ONTOLOGY; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PROTEINS; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84929622388     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu851     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altschul S.F., et al. (1997). Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402
2. Andrade M.A. and Valencia A. (1998). Automatic extraction of keywords from scientific text: application to the knowledge domain of protein families. Bioinformatics, 14, 600-607
3. Brenner S.E. (1999). Errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet.: TIG, 15, 132-133
4. Cozzetto D., et al. (2013). Protein function prediction by massive integration of evolutionary analyses and multiple data sources. BMC Bioinformatics, 14(Suppl. 3), S1
5. Falda M., et al. (2012). Argot2: a large scale function prediction tool relying on semantic similarity of weighted gene ontology terms. BMC Bioinformatics, 13(Suppl. 4), S14
6. Frishman D., et al. (2001). Functional and structural genomics using pedant. Bioinformatics, 17, 44-57
7. Gilks W.R., et al. (2002). Modeling the percolation of annotation errors in a database of protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 18, 1641-1649
8. Gilks W.R., et al. (2005). Percolation of annotation errors through hierarchically structured protein sequence databases. Math. Biosci., 193, 223-234
9. Götz S., et al. (2008). High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the blast2go suite. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, 3420-3435
10. Hadley C. (2003). Righting the wrongs. EMBO Rep., 4, 829-831
11. Jones C.E., et al. (2007). Estimating the annotation error rate of curated go database sequence annotations. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 170
12. Kankainen M., et al. (2012). Blannotator: enhanced homology-based function prediction of bacterial proteins. BMC Bioinformatics, 13, 33
13. Koski L.B., et al. (2005). Autofact: an automatic functional annotation and classification tool. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 151
14. Koskinen J.P. and Holm L. (2012). Sans: high-throughput retrieval of protein sequences allowing 50 mismatches. Bioinformatics, 28, i438-i443
15. Lin D. (1998). An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Vol. 98, pp. 296-304
16. Magrane M. and Consortium U. (2011). UniProt knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database (Oxford), 2011, bar009
17. Martin D.M., et al. (2004). Gotcha: a new method for prediction of protein function assessed by the annotation of seven genomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 178
18. Meyer F., et al. (2009). Figfams: yet another set of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 6643-6654
19. Miller A. (2012). Subset Selection in Regression. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, New York
20. Naumoff D.G., et al. (2004). Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated: the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase. BMC Genomics, 5, 52
21. Overbeek R., et al. (2013). The seed and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (rast). Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D206-D214
22. Pesquita C., et al. (2009). Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000443
23. Punta M. and Ofran Y. (2008). The rough guide to in silico function prediction, or how to use sequence and structure information to predict protein function. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000160
24. Radivojac P., et al. (2013). A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat. Methods, 10, 221-227
25. Robert T. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc., 58, 267-288
26. Sboner A., et al. (2011). The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think! Genome Biol., 12, 125
27. Scharf M., et al. (1994). Genequiz: a workbench for sequence analysis. In: Intelligent Systems forMolecular Biology (ISMB), Vol. 2, pp. 348-353
28. Schlicker A., et al. (2006). A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 302
29. Schnoes A.M., et al. (2009). Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000605
30. Schnoes A.M., et al. (2013). Biases in the experimental annotations of protein function and their effect on our understanding of protein function space. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003063
31. Toronen P., et al. (2009). Robust extraction of functional signals from gene set analysis using a generalized threshold free scoring function. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 307
32. Vinayagam A., et al. (2004). Applying support vector machines for gene ontology based gene function prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 116
33. Wieser D., et al. (2004). Filtering erroneous protein annotation. Bioinformatics, 20(Suppl. 1), i342-i347