Prostate cancer: Top places where tumors hide on multiparametric MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 204, Issue 4, 2015, Pages W449-W456

  Rosenkrantz, Andrew B ^a   Verma, Sadhna ^b   Turkbey, Baris ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; MRI; Peripheral zone; Prostate cancer; Transition zone

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR FIBROMUSCULAR STROMAL TUMOR; ARTICLE; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER INFILTRATION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; PSEUDOTUMOR; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TUMOR VOLUME; URETHRA TUMOR; BIOPSY; CANCER GRADING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84929621654     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13280     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Yacoub JH, Verma S, Moulton JS, Eggener S, Ay-tekin O. Imaging-guided prostate biopsy: conventional and emerging techniques. RadioGraphics 2012; 32:819-837
2. Marks L, Young S, Natarajan S. MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol 2013; 23:43-50
3. Durmus T, Baur A, Hamm B. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer. Rofo 2014; 186:238-246
4. Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for signifcant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 2011; 108: E171-E178
5. Komai Y, Numao N, Yoshida S, et al. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy. J Urol 2013; 190:867-873
6. Ferda J, Kastner J, Hora M, et al. A role of multi-factorial evaluation of prostatic 3T MRI in patients with elevated prostatic-specifc antigen levels: prospective comparison with ultrasound-guided trans-rectal biopsy. Anticancer Res 2013; 33:2791-2795
7. Vourganti S, Rastinehad A, Yerram NK, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies. J Urol 2012; 188:2152-2157
8. Mowatt G, Scotland G, Boachie C, et al. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2013; 17:1-281
9. Hoeks CM, Somford DM, van Oort IM, et al. Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratifcation in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Invest Radiol 2014; 49:165-172
10. Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 2014; 66:22-29
11. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:746-757
12. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 2011; 261:46-66
13. McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma; correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12:897-906
14. Leake JL, Hardman R, Ojili V, et al. Prostate MRI: access to and current practice of prostate MRI in the United States. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11: 156-160
15. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178:2385-2389; discussion, 2389-2390
16. Boutier R, Girouin N, Cheikh AB, et al. Location of residual cancer after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2011; 108:1776-1781
17. Wefer AE, Hricak H, Vigneron DB, et al. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 2000; 164:400-404
18. Lee MC, Moussa AS, Zaytoun O, Yu C, Jones JS. Using a saturation biopsy scheme increases cancer detection during repeat biopsy in men with high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia. Urology 2011; 78:1115-1119
19. Iremashvili V, Pelaez L, Jorda M, et al. Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2012; 79:37-42
20. Nix JW, Turkbey B, Hoang A, et al. Very distal apical prostate tumours: identifcation on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla. BJU Int 2012; 110: E694-E700
21. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracap-sular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992; 148:331-337
22. Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H. Site of positive surgical margins infuences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2009; 104:1610-1614
23. McNeal JE, Haillot O. Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume. Prostate 2001; 49:48-57
24. McNeal JE, Villers A, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Microcarcinoma in the prostate: its association with duct-acinar dysplasia. Hum Pathol 1991; 22: 644-652
25. Yu J, Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Cockrell CH, Cote EP, Wallace TJ. Prostate cancer and its mimics at multiparametric prostate MRI. Br J Radiol 2014; 87:20130659
26. Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, et al. Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coeffcient and T2-sparse versus dense cancers. Radiology 2008; 249:900-908
27. Bratan F, Niaf E, Melodelima C, et al. Infuence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:2019-2029
28. Rosenkrantz AB, Mendrinos S, Babb JS, Taneja SS. Prostate cancer foci detected on multipara-metric magnetic resonance imaging are histologi-cally distinct from those not detected. J Urol 2012; 187:2032-2038
29. Fine SW, Al-Ahmadie HA, Gopalan A, Tickoo SK, Scardino PT, Reuter VE. Anatomy of the anterior prostate and extraprostatic space: a contemporary surgical pathology analysis. Adv Anat Pathol 2007; 14:401-407
30. Selman SH. The McNeal prostate: a review. Urology 2011; 78:1224-1228
31. Bouyé S, Potiron E, Puech P, Leroy X, Lemaitre L, Villers A. Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: zone of origin and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology. Prostate 2009; 69:105-113
32. Lemaitre L, Puech P, Poncelet E, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of anterior prostate cancer: morphometric assessment and correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:470-480
33. Lawrentschuk N, Haider MA, Daljeet N, et al. "Prostatic evasive anterior tumours": the role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int 2010; 105:1231-1236
34. McNeal JE. The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate 1981; 2:35-49
35. Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T, et al. Normal central zone of the prostate and central zone involvement by prostate cancer: clinical and MR imaging implications. Radiology 2012; 262:894-902
36. Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS. Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of mul-tiparametric prostate MRI. AJR 2014; 202:109-120
37. Hansford BG, Karademir I, Peng Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 569-577
38. McNeal JE. The prostate and prostatic urethra: a morphologic synthesis. J Urol 1972; 107:1008-1016
39. Myers R P, Cheville JC, Pawlina W. Making anatomic terminology of the prostate and contiguous structures clinically useful: historical review and suggestions for revision in the 21st century. Clin Anat 2010; 23:18-29
40. Jung SI, Donati OF, Vargas HA, Goldman D, Hri-cak H, Akin O. Transition zone prostate cancer: incremental value of diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging in tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Radiology 2013; 269:493-503
41. Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D, et al. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 2013; 266:207-217
42. Metens T, Miranda D, Absil J, Matos C. What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T? Eur Radiol 2012; 22:703-709
43. Katahira K, Takahara T, Kwee TC, et al. Ultrahigh-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:188-196
44. Ohgiya Y, Suyama J, Seino N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-high-b-value 3.0-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of prostate cancer. Clin Imaging 2012; 36:526-531
45. Maas MC, Futterer JJ, Scheenen TW. Quantitative evaluation of computed high B value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol 2013; 48:779-786
46. Rosenkrantz AB, Chandarana H, Hindman N, et al. Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:3170-3177