Very distal apical prostate tumours: Identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla

BJU International

Volumn 110, Issue 11 B, 2012, Pages

  Nix, Jeffrey W ^a   Turkbey, Baris ^a   Hoang, Anthony ^a   Volkin, Dmitry ^a   Yerram, Nitin ^a   Chua, Celene ^a   Linehan, W Marston ^a   Wood, Bradford ^b   Choyke, Peter ^a   Pinto, Peter A ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Distal apical region; MRI; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE; MULTIPARAMETRIC NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY DISTAL APICAL PROSTATE CANCER; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876447953     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11503.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10-29
2. Ishii J, Ohori M, Scardino P, Tsuboi T, Slawin K, Wheeler T. Significance of the craniocaudal distribution of cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. Int J Urol 2007; 14: 817-21
3. Dimmen M, Vlatkovic L, Hole KH, Nesland JM, Brennhovd B, Axcrona K. Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies. BJU Int 2012; 110: E69 - 75
4. Lee MC, Moussa AS, Zaytoun O, Yu C, Jones JS. Using a saturation biopsy scheme increases cancer detection during repeat biopsy in men with high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia. Urology 2011; 78: 1115-9
5. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-90
6. Boutier R, Girouin N, Cheikh AB et al. Location of residual cancer after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2011; 108: 1776-81
7. Turkbey B, Mani H, Shah V et al. Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. J Urol 2011; 186: 1818-24
8. Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2011; 186: 1281-5
9. Turkbey B, Bernardo M, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL. MRI of localized prostate cancer: coming of age in the PSA era. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012; 18: 34-45
10. Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection - histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2010; 255: 89-99
11. Fine SW, Reuter VE. Anatomy of the prostate revisited: implications for prostate biopsy and zonal origins of prostate cancer. Histopathology 2012; 60: 142-52
12. Iremashvili V, Pelaez L, Jorda M et al. Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2012; 79: 37-42
13. Moussa AS, Meshref A, Schoenfield L et al. Importance of additional ' extreme ' anterior apical needle biopsies in the initial detection of prostate cancer. Urology 2010; 75: 1034-9
14. Pal RP, Elmussareh M, Chanawani M, Khan MA. The role of a standardized 36 core template-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy technique in patients with previously negative transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. BJU Int 2012; 109: 367-71
15. Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW et al. Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010; 13: 71-7
16. Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Ciccariello M et al. Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 1875-83
17. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45-55
18. Psutka SP, Feldman AS, Rodin D, Olumi AF, Wu CL, McDougal WS. Men with organ-confined prostate cancer and positive surgical margins develop biochemical failure at a similar rate to men with extracapsular extension. Urology 2011; 78: 121-5
19. Preston MA, Carriere M, Raju G et al. The prognostic significance of capsular incision into tumor during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 613-8
20. Karavitakis M, Ahmed HU, Abel PD, Hazell S, Winkler MH. Margin status after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and the index lesion: implications for preoperative evaluation of tumor focality in prostate cancer. J Endourol 2012; 26: 503-8
21. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Mudaliar K et al. Anatomical retro-apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivity during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1364-73
22. Turkbey B, Xu S, Kruecker J et al. Documenting the location of systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: correlation with multiparametric MRI. Cancer Imaging 2011; 11: 31-6