Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 104, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1610-1614

  Godoy, Guilherme ^a   Tareen, Basir U ^a   Lepor, Herbert ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Prognosis; Prostate; Prostate specific antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER TISSUE; COHORT ANALYSIS; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERINEURIUM; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 69749093999     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Goto Y, Scardino PT. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1995 154 : 1818 1824
2. Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 2005 66 : 1245 1250
3. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997 50 : 733 739
4. Eastham JA, Kuroiwa K, Ohori M et al. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2007 70 : 965 969 (Pubitemid 350192610)
5. Orvieto MA, Alsikafi NF, Shalhav AL et al. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006 98 : 1199 1203
6. Pettus JA, Weight CJ, Thompson CJ, Middleton RG, Stephenson RA. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location. J Urol 2004 172 : 129 132
7. Simon MA, Kim S, Soloway MS. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins. J Urol 2006 175 : 140 145
8. Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2005 174 : 903 907
9. Berger AP, Volgger H, Rogatsch H et al. Screening with low PSA cutoff values results in low rates of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 2002 53 : 241 245
10. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Riedel E et al. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2003 170 : 2292 2295
11. Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ et al. Impact of obesity on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database study group. J Clin Oncol 2004 22 : 446 453
12. Ng JC, Koch MO, Daggy JK, Cheng L. Perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance. J Urol 2004 172 : 2249 2251
13. Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology 2007 69 : 1095 1101
14. Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Iocca A, Scherer B, Zincke H. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001 165 : 119 125
15. Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 2000 163 : 1171 1177
16. Kausik SJ, Blute ML, Sebo TJ et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2002 95 : 1215 1219
17. Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S, Civantos F, Rubinowicz D, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology 1999 54 : 682 688
18. Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol 2002 167 : 2453 2456
19. Hernandez DJ, Epstein JI, Trock BJ, Tsuzuki T, Carter HB, Walsh PC. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experienced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle? J Urol 2005 173 : 446 449
20. Villers A. Extracapsular tumor extension in prostatic cancer: pathways of spread and implications for radical prostatectomy. In Stamey TA, Monographs in Urology, Vol. 15, no. 4. Mont-Verde, FL : Medical Directions Publishing, 1994 : 61 77