Normal central zone of the prostate and central zone involvement by prostate cancer: Clinical and mr imaging implications

Radiology

Volumn 262, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 894-902

  Vargas, Hebert Alberto ^a   Akin, Oguz ^a   Franiel, Tobias ^b   Goldman, Debra A ^a   Udo, Kazuma ^a   Touijer, Karim A ^a   Reuter, Victor E ^a   Hricak, Hedvig ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84858731413     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110663     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. McNeal JE. Regional morphology and pathology of the prostate. Am J Clin Pathol 1968;49(3):347-357.
2. Hricak H, Dooms GC, McNeal JE, et al. MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148(1):51-58. (Pubitemid 17005360)
3. Sommer FG, McNeal JE, Carrol CL. MR depiction of zonal anatomy of the prostate at 1.5 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10(6):983-989. (Pubitemid 17200099)
4. McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma: correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12(12):897-906. (Pubitemid 19011040)
5. Noguchi M, Stamey TA, Neal JE, Yemoto CE. An analysis of 148 consecutive transition zone cancers: clinical and histological characteristics. J Urol 2000;163(6):1751-1755. (Pubitemid 30366728)
6. Stamey TA, Donaldson AN, Yemoto CE, McNeal JE, Sözen S, Gill H. Histological and clinical findings in 896 consecutive prostates treated only with radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiologic significance of annual changes. J Urol 1998;160(6 pt 2):2412-2417. (Pubitemid 29483052)
7. Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS, et al. Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239(3):784-792. (Pubitemid 43830614)
8. Li H, Sugimura K, Kaji Y, et al. Conventional MRI capabilities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the transition zone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(3):729-742. (Pubitemid 46100257)
9. Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y, et al. Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2010;257(3):715-723.
10. e, and corresponding histologic features. Radiology 2010;255(2):485-494.
11. Zechmann CM, Simpfendörfer T, Giesel FL, et al. Comparison of peripheral zone and central gland volume in patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34(5):739-745.
12. Iwazawa J, Mitani T, Sassa S, Ohue S. Prostate cancer detection with MRI: is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in addition to diffusion-weighted imaging? Diagn Interv Radiol 2011;17(3):243-248.
13. Riches SF, Hawtin K, Charles-Edwards EM, de Souza NM. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR Biomed 2009;22(3):318-325.
14. Lowry M, Zelhof B, Liney GP, Gibbs P, Pickles MD, Turnbull LW. Analysis of prostate DCE-MRI: comparison of fast exchange limit and fast exchange regimen pharmacokinetic models in the discrimination of malignant from normal tissue. Invest Radiol 2009;44(9):577-584.
15. Kershaw LE, Hutchinson CE, Buckley DL. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: evaluation of T1, T2, and microvascular characteristics with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29(3):641-648.
16. Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, van Lin EN, et al. Changes in prostate shape and volume and their implications for radiotherapy after introduction of endorectal balloon as determined by MRI at 3T. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73(5):1446-1453.
17. Shi H, Kong X, Feng G, Xu H, Liu D, Yu Q. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo planar MR imaging of normal human prostate using different b values. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2008;28(6):737-740.
18. Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases. Abdom Imaging 2008;33(6):724-728.
19. Quick CM, Gokden N, Sangoi AR, Brooks JD, McKenney JK. The distribution of PAX-2 immunoreactivity in the prostate gland, seminal vesicle, and ejaculatory duct: comparison with prostatic adenocarcinoma and discussion of prostatic zonal embryogenesis. Hum Pathol 2010;41(8):1145-1149.
20. Mai KT, Belanger EC, Al-Maghrabi HM, Robertson S, Wang D, Margnean C. Primary prostatic central zone adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 2008;204(4):251-258.
21. Cohen RJ, Shannon BA, Phillips M, Moorin RE, Wheeler TM, Garrett KL. Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features. J Urol 2008;179(5):1762-1767; discussion 1767.
22. Srodon M, Epstein JI. Central zone histology of the prostate: a mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol 2002;33(5):518-523. (Pubitemid 34747871)
23. Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 1997;53(2):567-578. (Pubitemid 27262219)
24. Weinreb JC, Blume JD, Coakley FV, et al. Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy-results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. Radiology 2009;251(1):122-133.
25. Park BK, Kim B, Kim CK, Lee HM, Kwon GY. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31(4):534-538. (Pubitemid 47457665)