Meta-analysis of flow modeling performances-to build a matching system between catchment complexity and model types

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2463-2477

  Zhuo, Lu ^a   Dai, Qiang ^a   Han, Dawei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparative assessment; Hydrological model selection; Meta analysis; River flow modelling

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DECISION MAKING; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING SUPPORT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; META ANALYSIS; RIVER FLOW; SEMI-DISTRIBUTED MODEL; WATERRESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

CLIMATE MODELS;

CATCHMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOW MODELING; META-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RIVER FLOW;

EID: 84929484588     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10371     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ackerman D, Schiff KC, Weisberg SB. 2005. Evaluating Hspf In An Arid, Urbanized Watershed1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(2): 477-486.
2. Adamowski J, Sun K. 2010. Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 390(1): 85-91.
3. Ahearn DS, Sheibley RW, Dahlgren RA, Anderson M, Johnson J, Tate KW. 2005. Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last free-flowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. Journal of Hydrology 313(3): 234-247.
4. Ambroise B, Freer J, Beven K. 1996. Application of a generalized TOPMODEL to the small Ringelbach catchment, Vosges, France. Water Resources Research 32(7): 2147-2159.
5. Anderson MG, Burt TP. 1985. Hydrological forecasting, Anderson M. G., Burt T. P. (eds). John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK; 1-13.
6. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. 1992. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 268(2): 240-248.
7. Bartholomé E, Belward A. 2005. GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26(9): 1959-1977.
8. Bell V, Carrington D, Moore R. 2001. Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for flood forecasting. Part 2: Calibration and evaluation of models.
9. Beven K. 1992. Editorial: Future of distributed modelling. Hydrological Processes 6(3): 253-254.
10. Beven K. 2002. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system. Hydrological Processes 16(2): 189-206.
11. Bork EW, Su JG. 2007. Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 111(1): 11-24.
12. Bormann H. 2010. Towards a hydrologically motivated soil texture classification. Geoderma 157(3): 142-153.
13. Bormann H, Diekkrueger B, Richter O. 1999. Effects of spatial data resolution on the calculation of regional water balances. IAHS Publication(International Association of Hydrological Sciences)(254); 193-202.
14. Boyle DP, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Koren V, Zhang Z, Smith M. 2001. Toward improved streamflow forecasts: Value of semidistributed modeling. Water Resources Research 37(11): 2749-2759.
15. Cabus P. 2008. River flow prediction through rainfall-runoff modelling with a probability-distributed model (PDM) in Flanders, Belgium. Agricultural Water Management 95(7): 859-868.
16. Campling P, Gobin A, Beven K, Feyen J. 2002. Rainfall-runoff modelling of a humid tropical catchment: the TOPMODEL approach. Hydrological Processes 16(2): 231-253.
17. Carpenter TM, Georgakakos KP. 2006. Intercomparison of lumped versus distributed hydrologic model ensemble simulations on operational forecast scales. Journal of Hydrology 329(1): 174-185.
18. Carpenter TM, Georgakakos KP, Sperfslagea JA. 2001. On the parametric and NEXRAD-radar sensitivities of a distributed hydrologic model suitable for operational use. Journal of Hydrology 253(1): 169-193.
19. Chen X, Yang T, Wang X, Xu C-Y, Yu Z. 2013. Uncertainty Intercomparison of Different Hydrological Models in Simulating Extreme Flows. Water resources management 27(5): 1393-1409.
20. Christensen NS, Wood AW, Voisin N, Lettenmaier DP, Palmer RN. 2004. The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Climatic Change 62(1-3): 337-363.
21. Cuo L, Lettenmaier DP, Mattheussen BV, Storck P, Wiley M. 2008. Hydrologic prediction for urban watersheds with the Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model. Hydrological Processes 22(21): 4205-4213.
22. DerSimonian R, Laird N. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7(3): 177-188.
23. Diskin M, Simon E. 1977. A procedure for the selection of objective functions for hydrologic simulation models. Journal of Hydrology 34(1): 129-149.
24. Duval S, Tweedie R. 2000. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot-Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Biometrics 56(2): 455-463.
25. Hall M. 2001. How well does your model fit the data? Journal of Hydroinformatics 3: 49-55.
26. Harsch MA, Hulme PE, McGlone MS, Duncan RP. 2009. Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecology Letters 12(10): 1040-1049.
27. He S, Nan Z, Wang S, Wang Y. 2012. Application and comparative analysis of four conceptual hydrological models for upper reach of Heihe river basin. Journal Of China Hydrology 32(3).
28. Im S, Kim H, Kim C, Jang C. 2009. Assessing the impacts of land use changes on watershed hydrology using MIKE SHE. Environmental Geology 57(1): 231-239.
29. irstea. 2014. Hydrological forecasting models: towards a better anticipation of low water flows? Retrieved 29/07/2014, from Irstea National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture http://www.irstea.fr/en/all-news/water-department/hydrological-forecasting-models-anticipation-low-water
30. Khan MH. 1993. Xinanjiang Model on Bird Creek catchment in USA. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 14(4): 373-382.
31. Khan K, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. 2003. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 96(3): 118-121.
32. King WR, He J. 2006. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43(6): 740-755.
33. Konz M, Chiari M, Rimkus S, Turowski J, Molnar P, Rickenmann D, Burlando P. 2011. Sediment transport modelling in a distributed physically based hydrological catchment model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(9): 2821-2837.
34. Koren V, Reed S, Smith M, Zhang Z, Seo D-J. 2004. Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service. Journal of Hydrology 291(3): 297-318.
35. Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. 1992. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 327(4): 248-254.
36. Lin G-F, Chen G-R, Huang P-Y, Chou Y-C. 2009. Support vector machine-based models for hourly reservoir inflow forecasting during typhoon-warning periods. Journal of Hydrology 372(1): 17-29.
37. Lindström G, Johansson B, Persson M, Gardelin M, Bergström S. 1997. Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology 201(1): 272-288.
38. McDonnell JJ, Woods R. 2004. On the need for catchment classification. Journal of Hydrology 299(1): 2-3.
39. Merz R, Parajka J, Blöschl G. 2009. Scale effects in conceptual hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research 45(9): W09405.
40. Merz R, Parajka J, Blöschl G. 2011. Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses. Water Resources Research 47(2): W02531.
41. Mnatsakanyan B, Aghababyan K, Chilingaryan L. 2007. On the Calculation of Maximal Outlets of Small Mountainous Rivers (in Armenian conditions). Nato Security Through Science Series D-Information And Communication Security 12: 245.
42. NASA. 2000. Global Soil Texture And Derived Water-Holding Capacities (Webb et al.). Retrieved 29/07/2014 http://daac.ornl.gov/SOILS/guides/Webb.html
43. Nash J, Sutcliffe J. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282-290.
44. Nester T, Kirnbauer R, Gutknecht D, Blöschl G. 2011. Climate and catchment controls on the performance of regional flood simulations. Journal of Hydrology 402(3): 340-356.
45. Northern Ireland Water Framework Directive. 2005. River Reference Conditions, Article 5 Characterization Technical Report: Northern Ireland Water Framework Directive.
46. Parajka J, Viglione A, Rogger M, Salinas J, Sivapalan M, Blöschl G. 2013. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins-Part 1: Runoff hydrograph studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 10(1): 375-409.
47. Pechlivanidis I, McIntyre N, Wheater H. 2010. Calibration of the semi-distributed PDM rainfall-runoff model in the Upper Lee catchment, UK. Journal of Hydrology 386(1): 198-209.
48. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 4(2): 439-473.
49. PREMHYCE. 2011-2013. Prediction of Low-Flow Periods by Hydrological Models: Comparison and Evaluation, financed by ONEMA and MEDDE. Scientific partners: Irstea, BRGM, Météo France, EDF-DTG, University of Lorraine.
50. Ramachandra Rao A, Srinivas V. 2006. Regionalization of watersheds by hybrid-cluster analysis. Journal of Hydrology 318(1): 37-56.
51. Reed S, Koren V, Smith M, Zhang Z, Moreda F, Seo D-J, DMIP Participants. 2004. Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. Journal of Hydrology 298(1): 27-60.
52. Reed D. 1999. Flood estimation handbook. 1 Overview. Institute of Hydrology: UK.
53. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. 1995. Mike She. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh, V.P. (ed). Water Resources Publications; 809-846.
54. Rouhani H, Willems P, Wyseure G, Feyen J. 2007. Parameter estimation in semi-distributed hydrological catchment modelling using a multi-criteria objective function. Hydrological Processes 21(22): 2998-3008.
55. Saleh A, Du B. 2004. Evaluation of SWAT and HSPF within BASINS program for the upper North Bosque River watershed in central Texas. Transactions of the ASAE 47(4): 1039-1049.
56. Salinas J, Laaha G, Rogger M, Parajka J, Viglione A, Sivapalan M, Blöschl G. 2013. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins--Part 2: Flood and low flow studies. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions 17: 2637-2652.
57. Sawicz K, Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch P, Carrillo G. 2011. Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(9): 2895-2911.
58. Schaefli B, Gupta HV. 2007. Do Nash values have value? Hydrological Processes 21(15): 2075-2080.
59. Schaefli B, Hingray B, Niggli M, Musy A. 2005. A conceptual glacio-hydrological model for high mountainous catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9: 95-109, doi: 10.5194/hess-9-95-2005.
60. Senthil K, Sudheer K, Jain S, Agarwal P. 2005. Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types. Hydrological Processes 19(6): 1277-1291.
61. Shi P, Chen C, Srinivasan R, Zhang X, Cai T, Fang X., Li Q. 2011. Evaluating the SWAT model for hydrological modeling in the Xixian watershed and a comparison with the XAJ model. Water Resources Management 25(10): 2595-2612.
62. Singh J, Knapp HV, Arnold J, Demissie M. 2005. Hydrological modeling of the iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(2): 343-360.
63. Sivakumar B, Singh V. 2011. Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 8(3): 4427-4458.
64. Skoulikidis NT, Amaxidis Y, Bertahas I, Laschou S, Gritzalis K. 2006. Analysis of factors driving stream water composition and synthesis of management tools-a case study on small/medium Greek catchments. Science of the Total Environment 362(1): 205-241.
65. Smith MB, Koren V, Finnerty B, Johnson DL. 1999. Distributed modeling: Phase 1 results: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service.
66. Smith MB, Seo D-J, Koren V, Reed S, Zhang Z, Duan Q., Cong S. 2004. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. Journal of Hydrology 298(1): 4-26.
67. Takeuchi K, Hapuarachchi P, Zhou M, Ishidaira H, Magome J. 2008. A BTOP model to extend TOPMODEL for distributed hydrological simulation of large basins. Hydrological Processes 22(17): 3236-3251.
68. Todini E. 1996. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology 175(1): 339-382.
69. Tokar AS, Markus M. 2000. Precipitation-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks and conceptual models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5(2): 156-161.
70. Troch PA, Carrillo G, Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Sawicz K. 2013. Climate-vegetation-soil interactions and long-term hydrologic partitioning: signatures of catchment co-evolution. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 10(3): 2927-2954.
71. Vieux BE, Moreda FG. 2003. Ordered physics-based parameter adjustment of a distributed model. Water Science and Application 6: 267-281.
72. Vischel T, Pegram G, Sinclair S, Parak M. 2008. Implementation of the TOPKAPI model in South Africa: Initial results from the Liebenbergsvlei catchment. Water SA 34(3): 1-12.
73. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch P, Woods R. 2007. Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity. Geography Compass 1(4): 901-931.
74. Webb RW, Rosenzweig CE, Levine ER. 2000. Global Soil Texture and Derived Water-Holding Capacities (Webb et al.). Data set. Available on-line [http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
75. Whitaker A, Alila Y, Beckers J, Toews D. 2003. Application of the distributed hydrology soil vegetation model to Redfish Creek, British Columbia: Model evaluation using internal catchment data. Hydrological Processes 17(2): 199-224.
76. Winter TC. 2001. The Concept Of Hydrologic Landscapes. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 335-349. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb00973.x
77. Xevi E, Christiaens K, Espino A, Sewnandan W, Mallants D, Sørensen H, Feyen J. 1997. Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE-SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as case study. Water Resources Management 11(3): 219-242.
78. Xie H, Lian Y. 2013. Uncertainty-based evaluation and comparison of SWAT and HSPF applications to the Illinois River Basin. Journal of Hydrology 481: 119-131.
79. Xiong L, Guo S. 2004. Effects of the catchment runoff coefficient on the performance of TOPMODEL in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Processes 18(10): 1823-1836.
80. Yew Gan T, Dlamini EM, Biftu GF. 1997. Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 192(1): 81-103.
81. Zhang Z, Koren V, Smith M, Reed S, Wang D. 2004. Use of next generation weather radar data and basin disaggregation to improve continuous hydrograph simulations. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 9(2): 103-115.
82. Zhang Z, Wang S, Sun G, McNulty SG, Zhang H, Li J., Strauss P. 2008. Evaluation of the MIKE SHE Model for Application in the Loess Plateau, China1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44(5): 1108-1120.