Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 946-955

  Tedesco Triccas, L ^a   Burridge, J H ^a   Hughes, A M ^a   Pickering, R M ^b   Desikan, M ^c   Rothwell, J C ^c   Verheyden, G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Non invasive brain stimulation; Recovery; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT THERAPY; NEUROREHABILITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER LIMB; VIRTUAL REALITY EXPOSURE THERAPY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84929439835     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.067     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adeyemo B.O., Simis M., Macea D., Fregni F. Systematic review of parameters of stimulation: clinical trial design characteristics and motor outcomes in noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke. Front Psychiatry 2012, 3:88. 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00088.
2. Albert S., Kesselring J. Neurorehabilitation of stroke. J Neurol 2012, 259:817-832.
3. Alonzo A., Brassil J., Taylor J.L., Martin D., Loo C.K. Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 2012, 5:208-213.
4. Bastani A., Jaberzadeh S. Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2012, 123(4):644-657.
5. Batsikadze G., Moliadze V., Paulus W., Kuo M.F., Nitsche M.A. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol 2013, 591:1987-2000.
6. Boggio P.S., Nunes A., Rigonatti S.P., Nitsche M.A., Pascual-Leone A., Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007, 25:123-129.
7. Bolognini N., Vallar G., Casati C., Latif L.A., El-Nazer R., Williams J., et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 25:819-829.
8. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J., Rothstein H.R. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2010, 1:97-111.
9. Brunoni A.R., Nitsche M.A., Bolognini N., Bikson M., Wagner T., Merabet L., et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2012, 5:175-195.
10. Butler A.J., Shuster M., O'Hara E., Hurley K., Middlebrooks D., Guilkey K. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. J Hand Ther 2013, 26:162-171.
11. Clarke P.J. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil 1999, 21:116-123.
12. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992, 112(1):155-159.
13. Dell'Osso B., Camuri G., Castellano F., Vecchi V., Benedetti M., Bortolussi S., et al. Meta-review of metanalytic studies with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of major depression. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2011, 7:167-177.
14. Duncan P.W., Bode R.K., Min Lai S., Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:950-963.
15. Elsner B., Kugler J., Pohl M., Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 11:CD009645.
16. Eng J.J., Teasell R.W., Miller W.C., Wolfe D.L., Townson A.F., Aubut J.A., et al. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence: method of the SCIRE systematic review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2007, 13:1-10.
17. Ferraro M., Palazzolo J., Krol J., Krebs H., Hogan N., Volpe B. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 2003, 61:1604-1607.
18. Fitzgerald P.B., Fountain S., Daskalakis Z.J. A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:2584-2596.
19. Galea J.M., Vazquez A., Pasricha N., De Xivry J.J.O., Celnik P. Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex 2011, 21:1761-1770.
20. Galletly C., Gill S., Clarke P., Burton C., Fitzgerald P. A randomized trial comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation given 3 days/week and 5 days/week for the treatment of major depression: is efficacy related to the duration of treatment or the number of treatments?. Psychol Med 2012, 42:981-988.
21. Gustavsson A., Svensson M., Jacobi F., Allgulander C., Alonso J., Beghi E., et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011, 21:718-779.
22. Hesse S., Waldner A., Mehrholz J., Tomelleri C., Pohl M., Wener C. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 25:838-846.
23. Hummel F., Celnik P., Giraux P., Floel A., Wu W.H., Gerloff C., et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005, 128:490-499.
24. Khedr E.M., Ahmed M.A., Fathy M., Rothwell J.C. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005, 65:466-468.
25. Khedr E.M., Shawky O.A., El-Hammady D.H., Rothwell J.C., Darwish E.S., Mostafa O.M., et al. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013, 27:592-601.
26. Kim D.Y., Lim J.Y., Kang E.K., You D.S., Oh M.K., Oh B.M., et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010, 89(11):879-886.
27. Kim Y.H., You S.H., Ko M.H., Park J.W., Lee K.H., Jang S.H., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 2006, 37:1471-1476.
28. Kobayashi M., Hutchinson S., Theoret H., Schlaug G., Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology 2004, 62:91-98.
29. Kolominsky-Rabas P.L., Weber M., Gefeller O., Neundoerfer B., Heuschmann P.U. Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria: incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study. Stroke 2001, 32:2735-2740.
30. Kwakkel G., Kollen B. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant?. Int J Stroke 2013, 8:25-32.
31. Kwakkel G., Kollen B.J., Van Der Grong J., Prevo A.J.H. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003, 34:2181-2186.
32. Lee S.J., Chun M.H. Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014, 95:431-438.
33. Lindenberg R., Renga V., Zhu L., Nair D., Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010, 75:2176-2184.
34. Lopez-Alonso V., Cheeran B., Río-Rodríguez D., Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul 2014, 7(3):372-380.
35. Lum P.S., Burgar C.G., Shor P.C., Majmundar M., Van Der Loos M. Obot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:952-959.
36. Monica W. The World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration: WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. J Clin Epidemiol 1988, 41:105-114.
37. Monte-Silva K., Kuo M.F., Hessenthaler S., Fresnoza S., Liebetanz D., Paulus W., et al. Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain stimul 2013, 6:424-432.
38. Nair D.G., Renga V., Lindenberg R., Zhu L., Schlaug G. Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011, 29:411-420.
39. Nitsche M., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000, 527:633-639.
40. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001, 57:1899-1901.
41. Nitsche M.A., Nitsche M.S., Klein C.C., Tergai F., Rothwell J.C., Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:600-604.
42. Nitsche M.A., Schauenburg A., Lang N., Liebetanz D., Exner C., Paulus W., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15:619-626.
43. O'Reardon J.P., Solvason H.B., Janicak P.G., Sampson S., Isenberg K.E., Nahas Z., et al. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 2007, 62:1208-1216.
44. Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V., Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience-virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000, 10:232-237.
45. Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 56:249-254.
46. Perenboom R.J., Chorus A.M. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:577-587.
47. Reis J., Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol 2011, 24:590-596.
48. Reis J., Schambra H.M., Cohen L.G., Buch E.R., Fritsch B., Zarahn E., et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:1590-1595.
49. Saka Ö., Mcguire A., Wolfe C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing 2009, 38:27-32.
50. Stagg C., Jayaram G., Pastor D., Kincses Z., Matthews P., Johansen-Berg H. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:800-804.
51. Teo J.T., Swayne O.B., Cheeran B., Greenwood R.J., Rothwell J.C. Human theta burst stimulation enhances subsequent motor learning and increases performance variability. Cereb Cortex 2011, 21:1627-1638.
52. Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., Light K., Thompson P. The motor activity log-28 assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006, 67:1189-1194.
53. Viana R., Laurentino G., Souza R., Fonseca J., Silva Filho E., Dias S., et al. Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation 2014, 34(3):437-446.
54. WHO 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [Online]. WHO. Available: [Accessed 15/07/2012 2012]. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
55. Wiethoff S., Hamada M., Rothwell J.C. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2014, 7(3):468-475.
56. Wu D., Qian L., Zorowitz R.D., Zhang L., Qu Y., Yuan Y. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013, 94:1-8.