Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Elsner, Bernhard ^a   Kugler, Joachim ^a   Pohl, Marcus ^b   Mehrholz, Jan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DRESDEN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; BARTHEL INDEX; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; META ANALYSIS; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PARALLEL DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY FUGL-MEYER SCORE; ADULT; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 84900759661     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (142)

1. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2007;25(2):123-9.
2. Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, Latif LA, El-Nazer R, Williams J, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2011;25(9):819-29.
3. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJL, Lima MC, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005;16(14):1551-5.
4. Fusco A, De Angelis D, Morone G, Maglione L, Paolucci T, Bragoni M, et al. The ABC of tDCS: effects of anodal, bilateral and cathodal montages of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with stroke-a pilot study. Stroke Research and Treatment 2013; Vol. 2013:837595. [2090-8105]
5. Geroin C, Picelli A, Munari D, Waldner A, Tomelleri C, Smania N. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison. Clinical Rehabilitation 2011;25(6):537-48.
6. NCT01040299. Mechanized gait trainer combine transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS) in chronic stroke. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01040299 (accessed 4 March 2013).
7. Hesse S, Waldner A, Mehrholz J, Tomelleri C, Pohl M, Werner C. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2011;25(9):838-46.
8. NCT00407667. Transcranial galvanic stimulation after stroke. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00407667 (accessed 4 March 2013).
9. Waldner A, Werner C, Mehrholz J, Tomelleri C, Pohl M, Hesse S. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012;26(4):400 (Abst 009).
10. Werner C, Hesse S. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive arm training to enhance motor function of the severely affected arm after stroke: a double blind placebo RCT (TRAGAT) - preliminary results. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2009;27 Suppl 6:147.
11. Werner C, Hesse S, Kroczek G, Waldner A. Transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS) + robot-assisted therapy to improve upper limb impairment after stroke: a double-blind placebo controlled trial: preliminary results. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22(5):550-1.
12. Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH, Rothwell JC, Darwish ES, Mostafa OM, et al. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2013:epub. [DOI: 10.1177/1545968313484808]
13. NCT01601392. Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01601392 (accessed 4 March 2013).
14. Kim DY, Ohn SH, Yang EJ, Park C-I, Jung KJ. Enhancing motor performance by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009;88(10):829-36.
15. Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, You DS, Oh MK, Oh BM, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010;89(11):879-86.
16. Lindenberg R, Nair D, Zhu LL, Renga V, Schlaug G. Non-invasive motor cortex stimulation after stroke: the effect of number of sessions on outcome. Stroke 2011;42(3):e72.
17. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010;75(24):2176-84.
18. Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Schlaug G. Combined central and peripheral stimulation to facilitate motor recovery after stroke: the effect of number of sessions on outcome. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012; Vol. 26, issue 5:479-83.
19. Mahmoudi H, Borhani HA, Petramfar P, Jahanshahi S, Salehi Z, Fregni F. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2011;33(15-16):1383-8.
20. NCT00792428. Non-invasive brain stimulation and occupational therapy to enhance stroke recovery. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00792428 (accessed 4 March 2013).
21. Nair D, Renga V, Hamelin S, Pascual-Leone A, Schlaug G. Improving motor function in chronic stroke patients using simultaneous occupational therapy and TDCS. Stroke 2008;39(2):542.
22. Nair DG, Hamelin S, Pascual-Leone A, Schlaug G, Israel B. Transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with occupational therapy for 5 consecutive days improves motor function in chronic stroke patients. Stroke 2007;38(2):518.
23. Nair DG, Renga V, Lindenberg R, Zhu L, Schlaug G. Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2011;29(6):411-20.
24. Renga V, Lindenberg R, Zhu L, Nair D, Schlaug G. Facilitating stroke recovery using simultaneous occupational therapy and bi-hemispheric brain-stimulation. Stroke 2009;40(4):e150.
25. Schlaug G. TDCS+OT. Non-invasive brain stimulation and occupational therapy to enhance stroke recovery. Stroke Trials Registry, Internet Stroke Center: www.strokecenter.org/trials/2006. [CENTRAL: CN-00709259]
26. Qu YP, Wu DY, Tu XQ, Qian L, Yang YB, Geng H. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on relieving upper-limb spasticity after stroke [Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases 2009;6(11):586-9.
27. Rossi C, Sallustio F, Di Legge S, Rizzato B, Stanzione P, Koch G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) of the affected hemisphere in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a preliminary study. Cerebrovascular Diseases. Proceedings of the 19th European Stroke Conference; Barcelona, Spain. 2010:247-8. [1015-9770]
28. Rossi C, Sallustio F, Di Legge S, Stanzione P, Koch G. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients. European Journal of Neurology 2013; Vol. 20, issue 1:202-4.
29. ChiCTR-TRC-11001367. Effects on relieving upper-limb spasticity after stroke using transcranial direct current stimulation. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=ChiCTR-TRC-11001367 (accessed 4 March 2013).
30. Wu D, Qian L, Zorowitz R, Zhang L, Qu Y, Yuan Y. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94:1-8.
31. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2007;25(2):123-9.
32. Byblow W, Bradnam L, Barber PA, Stinear C. Ipsilateral effects of direct current stimulation. Proceedings of the 14th European Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology and the 4th International Conference on Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation, Rome, Italy. 2011.
33. Celnik P, Paik N-J, Vandermeeren Y, Dimyan M, Cohen LG. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke 2009;40(5):1764-71.
34. Paik N, Celnik P, Cohen L. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and noninvasive anodal cortical stimulation on motor learning in chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006;87:E2.
35. Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, Zipse J, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL, et al. Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2009;27(3):199-207.
36. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 2006;117:845-50.
37. Gurchin FA, Medvedev SV, Puzenko VI. Cortical electrostimulation in skull and brain injury [Russian]. Fiziologiia Cheloveka 1988;14(2):324-6.
38. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Flöel A, Wu W-H, GerloffC, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128(Pt 3):490-9.
39. Hummel F, Wu CJ, Flöel A, GerloffC, Cohen L. Effects of cortical stimulation on motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 2004;62 Suppl 5:A459-60 (Abst P06.008).
40. Hummel F, Voller B, Celnik P, Flöel A, Giraux P, GerloffC, et al. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neuroscience 2006;7:73.
41. Hummel F, Voller B, Celnik P, Flöel A, Giraux P, GerloffC, et al. Effects of cortical stimulation on visuomotor integration and force in stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2006;21:4-5 (Abst 9).
42. Jayaram G, Stinear JW. The effects of transcranial stimulation on paretic lower limb motor excitability during walking. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2009;26(4):272-9.
43. Kasashima Y, Fujiwara T, Matsushika Y, Tsuji T, Hase K, Ushiyama J, et al. Modulation of event-related desynchronization during motor imagery with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Experimental Brain Research 2012; Vol. 221, issue 3:263-8.
44. Kharchenko EV. Transcranial microelectrostimulation activates fast mechanisms of brain plasticity. Doklady Biological Sciences 2001;378:217-9.
45. Kitisomprayoonkul W. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves hand sensation in acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012; Vol. 93, issue 10:E33.
46. Kumar S, Wagner CW, Frayne C, Zhu L, Selim M, Feng W, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation may improve stroke-related dysphagia: a pilot study. Stroke 2011;42(4):1035-40.
47. Kwon YH, Jang SH. Onsite-effects of dual-hemisphere versus conventional single-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation: a functional MRI study. Neural Regeneration Research 2012; Vol. 7, issue 24:1889-94.
48. Lefebvre S, Laloux P, Peeters A, Desfontaines P, Jamart J, Vandermeeren Y. Dual-tDCS enhances online motor skill learning and long-term retention in chronic stroke patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013; Vol. 09.
49. Lefebvre S, Thonnard JL, Laloux P, Peeters A, Jamart J, Vandermeeren Y. Single session of dual-tDCS transiently improves precision grip and dexterity of the paretic hand after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2013 Mar 13 [Epub ahead of print].
50. Vandermeeren Y, Laloux P, Jamart J, Peeters A, Thonnard J-L, Lefebvre S. Dual hemisphere tDCS in chronic stroke patients improves 'simple' precision grip and digital dexterity of the paretic hand with a delayed time-course. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;33 Suppl 2:63 (Abst 9).
51. Madhavan S, Weber KA, Stinear JW. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation. Experimental Brain Research 2011;209(1):9-17.
52. Manganotti P, Daloli V, Fiaschi A. Decrease of upper limb spasticity after transcranial direct current stimulation in patients affected by stroke. Proceedings of the 14th European Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology and the 4th International Conference on Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation, Rome, Italy. 2011.
53. Ochi M, Saeki S, Oda T, Matsushima Y, Hachisuka K. Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2013; Vol. 45, issue 2:137-40.
54. Shiraishi J, Seeki S, Ochi M, Oda T, Matsushima Y, Yoshikawa K, et al. Combined robotic therapy with transcranial direct current stimulation. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;34 Suppl 1:132 (Abst PP-171).
55. Paquette C, Radlinska B, Sidel M, Thiel A. Reducing transcallosal inhibition with non-invasive brain stimulation to improve post-infarct motor disorders. Movement Disorders 2011; Vol. 26 Suppl 2:S40.
56. Sheliakin AM, Preobrazhenskaia IG, Tiul'kin ON. [Micropolarization of the brain: a noninvasive method for correction of morphological and functional disturbances in acute focal brain lesions and their consequences]. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii Imeni S.S. Korsakova 2006;106(10):27-37.
57. Stagg C. Transcranial direct current stimulation - evidence for functional improvements in conjunction with brain activation changes in chronic stroke patients. 3rd UK Stroke Forum Conference 2008:6.
58. Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, O'Shea J, Allman C, Bosnell RA, Kischka U, et al. Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain 2012;135(Pt 1):276-84.
59. Takeuchi N, Tada T, Matsuo Y, Ikoma K. Low-frequency repetitive TMS plus anodal transcranial DCS prevents transient decline in bimanual movement induced by contralesional inhibitory rTMS after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012; Vol. 26, issue 8:988-98.
60. Zimerman M, Heise KF, Hoppe J, Cohen LG, GerloffC, Hummel FC. Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand. Stroke 2012; Vol. 43, issue 8:2185-91.
61. Brem AK, Speight I, Jaencke L. Impact of tDCS on motor function in acute stroke. 6th World Congress of Neurorehabilitation 2010:123-7.
62. Danzl MM, Chelette K, Lee K, Lykins D, Sawaki L. Non-invasive brain stimulation paired with a novel locomotor training in chronic stroke: a feasibility study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012;93(10):E19-20.
63. Tahtis V, Kaski D, Seemungal BM. The effect of single session bi-cephalic transcranial direct current stimulation on gait performance in sub-acute stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;33 Suppl 2:42 (Abst 3).
64. ACTRN12613000109707. Standard upper limb therapy treatment with or without non-invasive brain stimulation to assist recovery after stroke. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12613000109707 (accessed 5 March 2013).
65. Ang KK, Guan C, Phua KS, Wang C, Teh I, Chen CW, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation and EEG-based motor imagery BCI for upper limb stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 2012; Vol. 2012:4128-31. [1557-170X]
66. Chelette K, Carrico C, Nichols L, Sawaki L. Optimizing transcranial direct current stimulation for motor recovery from severe post-stroke hemiparesis: early results from an ongoing clinical trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012; Vol. 93, issue 10:E20. [0003-9993]
67. ChiCTR-TRC-11001398. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on recovery of upper-limb function after stroke. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=ChiCTR-TRC-11001398 (accessed 4 March 2013).
68. ChiCTR-TRC-11001490. Using transcranial direct current stimulation to treat ataxia and balance impairment after stroke. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=ChiCTR-TRC-11001490 (accessed 4 March 2013).
69. NCT00542256. tDCS and physical therapy in stroke. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00542256?term=tDCS+and+physical+therapy+in+stroke&rank=1 (accessed 4 March 2013).
70. NCT00783913. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance the benefit of movement training in stoke patients. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00783913 (accessed 4 March 2013).
71. NCT00853866. Enhancement of motor function with reboxetine and transcranial direct current stimulation (STIMBOX). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00853866 (accessed 4 March 2013).
72. NCT00909714. Neuroregeneration enhanced by transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) in stroke. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00909714 (accessed 4 March 2013).
73. Hodics T, Cohen L, Upreti B, Alex A, Kowalske K, Hart J, et al. Enrollment in early brain stimulation arm motor recovery studies is limited primarily by stimulation-unrelated exclusions including ethnic and racial characteristics. Stroke 2012;43(2):(Abst 2439).
74. Hodics T, Hidler J, Xu B, Kowalske K, Hart J, Briggs R, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhanced stroke recovery and cortical reorganization. In: International Stroke Conference; San Antonio, Texas; February 23-26, 2010. [CENTRAL: CN-00747781]
75. Hodics T, Upreti B, Alex A, Xu B, Hidler J, Kowalske K, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhanced stroke recovery and cortical reorganization - an ongoing clinical trial. European Journal of Neurology 2011;18(Suppl 2):127.
76. Hodics TM, Dromerick AW, Pezullo JC, Xu B, Hidler J, Hart J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhanced stroke recovery and cortical reorganization. Proceedings of the International Stroke Conference. Los Angeles, USA, 2012:(Abst CT P25).
77. NCT01007136. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-enhanced stroke recovery. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01007136 (accessed 4 March 2013).
78. NCT01014897. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in chronic stroke recovery. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01014897 (accessed 4 March 2013).
79. NCT01127789. The use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to study implicit motor learning on patients with brain injury [Withdrawn]. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01127789 (accessed 4 March 2013).
80. NCT01143649. Use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) coupled with constraint induced movement therapy in stroke patients. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01143649 (accessed 4 March 2013).
81. NCT01201629. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01201629 (accessed 4 March 2013).
82. NCT01207336. Combined tDCS + PNS after acute stroke. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01207336 (accessed 4 March 2013).
83. NCT01356654. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01356654 (accessed 4 March 2013).
84. NCT01405378. Non-invasive brain stimulation for people with stroke. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01405378 (accessed 4 March 2013).
85. Tedesco Triccas L, Burridge J, Hughes AM, Verheyden G, Rothwell J. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with robot therapy for the impaired upper limb after sub-acute stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology 2011;122:S149-50.
86. NCT01414582. Transcranial stimulation and motor training in stroke rehabilitation. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01414582 (accessed 4 March 2013).
87. Kandel M, Beis JM, Ganis V, Prestini M, Paysant J, Jacquin-Courtois S. Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with physical therapy after stroke: feasability of a prospective, randomised, double blinded, sham controlled study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2011;54:e234.
88. NCT01500564. Functional interest of non invasive brain stimulation during physiotherapy at a subacute phase post stroke (anodal protocol): ReSTIM. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01500564 (accessed 4 March 2013).
89. NCT01503073. Noninvasive brain stimulation for stroke. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01503073 (accessed 4 March 2012).
90. NCT01519843. Post stroke motor learning. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01519843 (accessed 4 March 2013).
91. NCT01539096. Brain stimulation-aided stroke rehabilitation: neural mechanisms of recovery. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01539096 (accessed 4 March 2013).
92. NCT01544699. Impact of non-invasive brain stimulation on motor recuperation. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01544699 (accessed 4 March 2013).
93. NCT01574989. Effects of rTMS and tDCS on motor function in stroke. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01574989 (accessed 4 March 2013).
94. NCT01644929. Rehabilitation combined with bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute ischemic stroke (RECOMBINE). http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01644929 (accessed 4 March 2013).
95. NCT01726673. Robots paired with tDCS in stroke recovery. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT01726673 (accessed 4 March 2012).
96. NTR3315. The effect of non invasive brain stimulation on lower limb motor skill acquisition. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3315 (accessed 4 March 2013).
97. Sattler V, Acket B, Gerdelat-Mas A, Raposo N, Albucher JF, Thalamas C, et al. Effect of repeated sessions of combined anodal tDCS and peripheral nerve stimulation on motor performance in acute stroke: a behavioural and electrophysiological study [Effet sur la recuperation motrice post-AVC, en phase aigue, de sessions repetees de tDCS anodale du cortex moteur primaire couplee a une stimulation electrique peripherique repetitive]. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2012;55:e3 + e5-e6. [1877-0657]
98. Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 2005;30(20):1213-23.
99. Bastani A, Jaberzadeh S. Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Neurophysiology 2012; Vol. 123, issue 4:644-57.
100. Bindman LJ, Lippold OCJ, Redfearn JW. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. Journal of Physiology 1964;172(3):369-82.
101. Boggio PS, Castro LO, Savagim EA, Braite R, Cruz VC, Rocha RR, et al. Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscience Letters 2006;404(1-2):232-6.
102. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation are associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2007;25(2):123-9.
103. Boissy P, Bourbonnais D, Carlotti MM, Gravel D, Arsenault BA. Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999;13(4):354-62.
104. Bolognini N. Cochrane Review on tDCS on function and ADL after stroke. Personal Communication 8 May 2013.
105. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1497-500.
106. Butler AJ, Shuster M, O'Hara E, Hurley K, Middlebrooks D, Guilkey K. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. Journal of Hand Therapy 2013;26(2):162-70; quiz 171. [PUBMED: 22964028]
107. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. European Neurology 1980;19(6):382-9.
108. Floel A, Cohen LG. Recovery of function in humans: cortical stimulation and pharmacological treatments after stroke. Neurobiology of Disease 2010;37(2):243-51.
109. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJ, Lima MC, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005;16(14):1551-5.
110. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1975; Vol. 7, issue 1:13-31.
111. Fusco A. Cochrane Review on tDCS on function and ADL after stroke. Personal Communication 24 May 2013.
112. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1994;26:115-9.
113. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
114. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
115. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Physical Therapy 1984;64(1):35-40.
116. Hummel R, Celnik P, Giraux B, Floel A, Wu WH, GerloffC, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128:490-9.
117. Hummel FC, Voller B, Celnik P, Floel A, Giraux P, GerloffC, et al. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neuroscience 2006;7:73.
118. Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Experimental Brain Research 2012; Vol. 216, issue 1:1-10.
119. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1969;50:311-9.
120. Jeffery DT, Norton JA, Roy FD, Gorassini MA. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Experimental Brain Research 2007;182(2):281-7.
121. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Stroke. Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 1999;10(4):887-906.
122. Kim DY. Enhancing motor performance by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke patients. Personal Communication 20 March 2013.
123. Koch G. Cochrane Review on tDCS on function and ADL after stroke. Personal Communication 8 May 2013.
124. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003;34(9):2181-6.
125. Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain?. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005;22(2):495-504.
126. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1981;4(4):483-92.
127. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;14:61-5.
128. Mathers CD, Bernard C, Iburg KM, Inoue M, Ma Fat D, Shibuya K, et al. Global burden of disease: data sources, methods and results. www.who.int/healthinfo/bod/en/index.html (accessed 16 June 2011).
129. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001;57:1899-901.
130. Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Journal of Physiology 2003;114:600-4.
131. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Ameli M, Fink GR. Interhemsipsheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009;23(7):641-56.
132. Purpura DP, McMurtry JG. Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1965;28(1):166-85.
133. Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009;106(5):1590-5.
134. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
135. Schuling J, De Haan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke 1993;24:1173-7.
136. Sharpless JW. The nine-hole peg test of finger hand coordination for the hemiplegic patient. In: Mossman PL editor(s). Mossman's A Problem Oriented Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation. Vol. 2, Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1982:470-3.
137. Smania N. Cochrane Review on tDCS on function and ADL after stroke. Personal Communication 5 March 2013.
138. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D. Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
139. Suzuki K, Fujiwara T, Tanaka N, Tsuji T, Masakado Y, Hase K, et al. Comparison of the after-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex in patients with stroke and healthy volunteers. International Journal of Neuroscience 2012; Vol. 122, issue 11:675-81.
140. Whiting S, Lincoln N. An ADL assessment for stroke patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1980;43:44-6.
141. World Health Organization. The atlas of heart disease and stroke. www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/(accessed 8 June 2011).
142. Wu, D. Cochrane Review on tDCS on function and ADL after stroke. Personal Communication 9 March 2013.