Nuclear species-diagnostic SNP markers mined from 454 amplicon sequencing reveal admixture genomic structure of modern Citrus varieties

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Curk, Franck ^a,b   Ancillo, Gema ^b   Ollitrault, Frédérique ^b   Perrier, Xavier ^c   Jacquemoud Collet, Jean Pierre ^c   Garcia Lor, Andres ^b   Navarro, Luis ^b   Ollitrault, Patrick ^b,c  

^a UMR AGAP   (France)

^b INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRARIAS IVIA   (Spain)

^c CIRAD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMIXTURE GENOMIC STRUCTURE; AMPLICON; ARTICLE; CITRUS; CULTIVAR; CULTIVATED SPECIES; DATA MINING; DOMESTICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GERMPLASM; GRAPEFRUIT; INTROGRESSION; MANDARIN; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; ORANGELO; PHYLOGENOMICS; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PUMMELO; RHIZOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOUR ORANGE; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; SWEET ORANGE; TANGELO; TANGOR; TAXON; VARIETAS; ALLELE; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CITRUS; CITRUS AURANTIUM; CITRUS MAXIMA; CITRUS MEDICA; CITRUS MICRANTHA; CITRUS RETICULATA; CITRUS SINENSIS;

ALLELES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CITRUS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84929340278     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125628     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Swingle WT, Reece PC. The botany of citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD, editors. The citrus industry. Berkeley, California, USA: University of California Press; 1967. pp. 190-430.
2. Tanaka T. Citologia: Semi-centennial commemoration papers on Citrus studies. Osaka: Citologia Supporting Foundation; 1961.
3. Mabberley DJ. A classification for edible citrus (rutaceae). Telopea. 1997; 7: 167-172.
4. Federici CT, Fang DQ, Scora RW, Roose ML. Phylogenetic relationships within the genus citrus (rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 1998; 96: 812-822.
5. Nicolosi E, Deng ZN, Gentile A, La Malfa S, Continella G, Tribulato E. Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2000; 100: 1155-1166.
6. Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT. Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 112: 1519-1531. PMID: 16699791
7. Garcia-Lor A, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P. Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: A perspective for genetic association studies. Mol Genet Genomics. 2012; 287: 77-94. doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0658-4 PMID: 22160318
8. Ollitrault P, Terol J, Garcia-Lor A, Berard A, Chauveau A, Froelicher Y, et al. SNP mining in C. clementina BAC end sequences; transferability in the citrus genus (rutaceae), phylogenetic inferences and perspectives for genetic mapping. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 13-2164-13-13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-13 PMID: 22233093
9. Garcia-Lor A, Ancillo G, Navarro L, Ollitrault P. Citrus (rutaceae) SNP markers based on competitive allele-specific PCR; transferability across the aurantioideae subfamily. Applications in Plant Sciences. 2013; 1: 1200406. doi: 10.3732/apps.1200406 PMID: 25202535
10. Garcia-Lor A, Curk F, Snoussi-Trifa H, Morillon R, Ancillo G, Luro F, et al. A nuclear phylogenetic analysis: SNPs, indels and SSRs deliver new insights into the relationships in the 'true citrus fruit trees' group (citrinae, rutaceae) and the origin of cultivated species. Ann Bot. 2013; 111: 1-19. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs227 PMID: 23104641
11. Webber HJ, Reuther W, Lawton HW. History and development of the citrus industry. In: Reuther W, et al., editors. The Citrus Industry. Berkeley: University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences; 1967. pp. 1-39.
12. Scora RW. On the history and origin of citrus. Bull Torrey Bot Club. 1975; 102: 369-375.
13. Barrett HC, Rhodes AM. A numerical taxonomic study ofaffinity relationships in cultivated citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot. 1976; 1: 105-136.
14. Ollitrault P, Jacquemond C, Dubois C, Luro F. Citrus. In: Perla Hamon, Marc Seguin, Xavier Perrier, Glaszmann Jean-Christophe, editors. Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Montpellier: Cirad; 2003. pp. 193-217.
15. Luro F, Gatto J, Costantino G, Pailly O. Analysis of genetic diversity in citrus. Plant Genetic Resources. 2011; 9: 218-221.
16. Fanciullino AL, Dhuique-Mayer C, Luro F, Casanova J, Morillon R, Ollitrault P. Carotenoid diversity in cultivated citrus is highly influenced by genetic factors. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54: 4397-4406. PMID: 16756373
17. Ollitrault P, Navarro L. Citrus. In: Badenes M, Byrne De, editors. Fruit Breeding. London: Springer New York; 2012. pp. 623-662.
18. Krueger RR, Navarro L. Citrus germplasm resources. In: Anonymous Citrus Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2007. pp. 45-140.
19. Xu Q, Chen LL, Ruan X, Chen D, Zhu A, Chen C, et al. The draft genome of sweet orange (citrus sinensis). Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 59-66. doi: 10.1038/ng.2472 PMID: 23179022
20. Wu GA, Prochnik S, Jenkins J, Salse J, Hellsten U, Murat F, et al. Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 656-662. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2906 PMID: 24908277
21. Kijas JMH, Thomas MR, Fowler JCS, Roose ML. Integration of trinucleotide microsatellites into a linkage map of citrus. Theor Appl Genet. 1997; 94: 701-706.
22. Luro F, Costantino G, Terol J, Argout X, Allario T, Wincker P, et al. Transferability of the EST-SSRs developed on nules clementine (citrus clementina hort ex tan) to other citrus species and their effectiveness for genetic mapping. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9: 287. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-287 PMID: 18558001
23. Ollitrault F, Terol J, Pina JA, Navarro L, Talon M, Ollitrault P. Development of SSR markers from citrus clementina (rutaceae) BAC end sequences and interspecific transferability in citrus. Am J Bot. 2010; 97: e124-9. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000280 PMID: 21616814
24. Biswas MK, Chai L, Mayer C, Xu Q, Guo W, Deng X. Exploiting BAC-end sequences for the mining, characterization and utility of new short sequences repeat (SSR) markers in citrus. Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 39: 5373-5386. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1338-5 PMID: 22170603
25. Liu S, Li W, Long D, Hu C, Zhang J. Development and characterization of genomic and expressed SSRs in citrus by genome-wide analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e75149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075149 PMID: 24204572
26. Gulsen O, Roose ML. Lemons: Diversity and relationships with selected citrus genotypes as measured with nuclear genome markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 2001; 126: 309-317.
27. Gulsen O, Roose ML. Determination of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relations to citrus ancestors in lemons by DNA markers. Bahce. 2001; 30: 53-63.
28. Barkley NA, Krueger RR, Federici CT, Roose ML. What phylogeny and gene genealogy analyses reveal about homoplasy in citrus microsatellite alleles. Plant Syst Evol. 2009; 282: 71-86.
29. Ollitrault P, Garcia-Lor A, Terol J, Curk F, Ollitrault F, Talon M, et al. Comparative values of SSRs, SNPs and InDels for citrus genetic diversity analysis. Acta Horticulturae. 2014;Proceeding XII international Citrus Congress 2012.
30. Ramadugu C, Pfeil BE, Keremane ML, Lee RF, Maureira-Butler IJ, Roose ML. A six nuclear gene phylogeny of citrus (rutaceae) taking into account hybridization and lineage sorting. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e68410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068410 PMID: 23874615
31. Department of Energy's Joint Genome Institute, Center for Integrative Genomics. Phytozome; Available: http://www.phytozome.net/. 2014.
32. Life Sciences Corp. Using multiplex identifier (MID) adaptors for the GS FLX titanium chemistry-extended mid set. Technical Bulletin Genome Sequencer FLX System. 2009; 005: 1-7.
33. Life Sciences Corp. Amplicon fusion primer design guidelines for GS FLX titanium series lib-A chemistry. Technical Bulletin Genome Sequencer FLX System. 2009; 013: 1-3.
34. Fluidigm Corp. Access array system; Available: http://www.fluidigm.com/access-array-system.html; 2014.
35. PRINSEQ. PReprocessing and INformation of SEQuence data: Easy and rapid quality control and data preprocessing; Available: http://prinseq.sourceforge.net/index.html. 2012.
36. Life Sciences Corp. 454 sequencing system software manual, v 2.5.3; Part C-GS de novo assembler, GS reference mapper, SFF tools. 454 Sequencing System Software Manual. 2010: 2-213.
37. DNASTAR Inc. DNASTAR sofware for life scientists; Available: http://www.dnastar.com/t-nextgenseqman-ngen.aspx. 2014.
38. Cuppen E. Genotyping by allele-specific amplification (KASPar). CSH Protoc. 2007; 2007: pdb. prot4841.
39. Dereeper A, Nicolas S, Lecunff L, Bacilieri R, Doligez A, Peros JP, et al. SNiPlay: A web-based tool for detection, management and analysis of SNPs. application to grapevine diversity projects. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-134 PMID: 21545712
40. Dereeper A, Nicolas S, Lecunff L, Bacilieri R, Doligez A, Peros JP, et al. Available: Http://sniplay.cirad.fr/cgi-bin/home.cgi. 2013;2014.
41. Wright S. Variability within and among natural populations. In: Anonymous Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1978.
42. Cockerham CC, Weir BS. Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics. 1984; 40: 157-164. PMID: 6733226
43. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous windows pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000. 1996- 2004.
44. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70: 3321-3323. PMID: 4519626
45. Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP. DARwin software. 2006.
46. Pritchard Lab SU. Structure software; Available: http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/structure.html. 2014.
47. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155: 945-959. PMID: 10835412
48. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003; 164: 1567-1587. PMID: 12930761
49. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14: 2611-2620. PMID: 15969739
50. Ollitrault P, Terol J, Chen C, Federici CT, Lotfy S, Hippolyte I, et al. A reference genetic map of C. clementina hort. ex tan.; citrus evolution inferences from comparative mapping. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 593-2164-13-593. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-593 PMID: 23126659
51. Curk F, Ancillo G, Garcia-Lor A, Luro F, Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP, et al. Next generation haplotyping to decipher the nuclear genomic interspecific admixture in citrus species; analysis of the chromosome 2. BMC Genetics. accepted.
52. Edwards D, Batley J. Plant genome sequencing: Applications for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010; 8: 2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00459.x PMID: 19906089
53. Chen D, Ahlford A, Schnorrer F, Kalchhauser I, Fellner M, Viragh E, et al. High-resolution, high-throughput SNP mapping in drosophila melanogaster. Nat Methods. 2008; 5: 323-329. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1191 PMID: 18327265
54. van Os H, Andrzejewski S, Bakker E, Barrena I, Bryan GJ, Caromel B, et al. Construction of a 10,000-marker ultradense genetic recombination map of potato: Providing a framework for accelerated gene isolation and a genomewide physical map. Genetics. 2006; 173: 1075-1087. PMID: 16582432
55. Troggio M, Malacarne G, Coppola G, Segala C, Cartwright DA, Pindo M, et al. A dense single-nucleotide polymorphism-based genetic linkage map of grapevine (vitis vinifera L.) anchoring pinot noir bacterial artificial chromosome contigs. Genetics. 2007; 176: 2637-2650. PMID: 17603124
56. de Bakker PI, Burtt NP, Graham RR, Guiducci C, Yelensky R, Drake JA, et al. Transferability of tag SNPs in genetic association studies in multiple populations. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 1298-1303. PMID: 17057720
57. McCouch SR, Zhao K, Wright M, Tung C, Ebana K, Thomson M, et al. Development of genome-wide SNP assays for rice. Breed Sci. 2010; 60: 524-535.
58. Clark AG, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, Williamson SH, Nielsen R. Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res. 2005; 15: 1496-1502. PMID: 16251459
59. Rosenblum EB, Novembre J. Ascertainment bias in spatially structured populations: A case study in the eastern fence lizard. J Hered. 2007; 98: 331-336. PMID: 17611259
60. Albrechtsen A, Nielsen FC, Nielsen R. Ascertainment biases in SNP chips affect measures of population divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 27: 2534-2547. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq148 PMID: 20558595
61. Negrini R, Mazza R, Colli L, Pellecchia M, Bomba L, Stella A, et al. Effect of non-random sampling of SNPs on TheEstimation of population genetic parameters. 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP). 2010.
62. Trask JA, Malhi RS, Kanthaswamy S, Johnson J, Garnica WT, Malladi VS, et al. The effect of SNP discovery method and sample size on estimation of population genetic data for chinese and indian rhesus macaques (macaca mulatta). Primates. 2011; 52: 129-138. doi: 10.1007/s10329-010-0232-4 PMID: 21207104
63. Bradbury IR, Hubert S, Higgins B, Bowman S, Paterson IG, Snelgrove PV, et al. Evaluating SNP ascertainment bias and its impact on population assignment in atlantic cod, gadus morhua. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 11 Suppl 1: 218-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02949.x PMID: 21429176
64. Vezzulli S, Micheletti D, Riaz S, Pindo M, Viola R, This P, et al. A SNP transferability survey within the genus vitis. BMC Plant Biol. 2008; 8: 128-2229-8-128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-128 PMID: 19087337
65. Carlson CS, Smith JD, Stanaway IB, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA. Direct detection of null alleles in SNP genotyping data. Hum Mol Genet. 2006; 15: 1931-1937. PMID: 16644863
66. Herrero R, Asins MJ, Pina JA, Carbonell EA, Navarro L. Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily aurantioideae. II. genetic relationships among genera and species. Theor Appl Genet. 1996; 93: 1327-1334. doi: 10.1007/BF00223466 PMID: 24162546
67. Nicolosi E. Origin and taxonomy. In: Khan I, editor. Citrus genetics, breeding and biotechnology. Muscat, Sultanate of Oman; 2007. pp. 19-43.
68. Froelicher Y, Mouhaya W, Bassene JB, Costantino G, Kamiri M, Luro F, et al. New universal mitochondrial PCR markers reveal new information on maternal citrus phylogeny. Tree Genetics and Genomes. 2011; 7: 49-61.
69. Bretó MP, Ruiz C, Pina JA, Asins MJ. The diversification of citrus clementina hort. ex tan., a vegetatively propagated crop species. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001; 21: 285-293. PMID: 11697922
70. Uzun A, Yesiloglu T, Aka-Kacar Y, Tuzcu O, Gulsen O. Genetic diversity and relationships within citrus and related genera based on sequence related amplified polymorphism markers (SRAPs). Scientia Horticulturae. 2009; 121: 306-312.
71. Roose ML, Federici CT, Mu L, Kwok K, Vu C. Map-based ancestry of sweet orange and other citrus variety groups. Gentile A, Tribulato E eds Second International Citrus Biotechnology Symposium, 28 Tremestieri Etneo, Italy: Emme Erre Grafica. 2009.
72. Webber HJ. Cultivated varieties of citrus. In: Anonymous The Citrus Industry. History, World Distribution, Botany andVarieties. California; 1943. pp. 475-668.
73. de Moraes A, dos Santos Soares Filho W, Guerra M. Karyotype diversity and the origin of grapefruit. Chromosome Research. 2007: 115-121.
74. Curk F, Garcia-Lor A, Snoussi H, Froelicher Y, Ancillo G, Navaro L, et al. New insights on limes and lemons origin from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers genotyping and targeted nuclear gene sequencing. Acta Horticulturae. in press; Proceedings XII International Citrus Congress 2012.
75. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville AreaGRIN Taxonomy for PlantsAvailablehttp://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?1067920132014