Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 121-132

  Supasorn, Saksri ^a   Promarak, Vinich ^b  

^a UBON RATCHATHANI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b SURANAREE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929234624     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c4rp00190g     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Balci S., Cakiroglu J. and Tekkaya C., (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools, Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 34 (3), 99-102
2. Bektaşli O. and Cakmakci G., (2011), Consistency of students' ideas about the concept of rate across different contexts, Educ. Sci., 36 (162), 273-287
3. Bybee R. W., Taylor J. A., Gardner A., Van Scotter P., Powell J. C., Westbrook A. and Landes N., (2006), The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications, Colorado Springs: BSCS
4. Cakmakci G., (2010), Identifying alternative conceptions of chemical kinetics among secondary school and undergraduate students in Turkey, J. Chem. Educ., 87 (4), 449-455
5. Cakmakci G., Leach J. and Donnelly J., (2006) Students' ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28 (15), 1795-1815
6. Çalik M. and Ayas A., (2005), An analogy activity for incorporating students' conceptions of types of solutions, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6 (2), Article 6, 1-13
7. Çalik M., Ayas A. and Coll R. K., (2009a), Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students' conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts, Int. J. Sci. Math., 7, 651-676
8. Çalik M., Ayas A. and Ebenezer J., (2009b), Analogical reasoning for understanding solution rates: students' conceptual change and chemical explanations, Research in Science and Technological Education, 27 (3), 283-308
9. Çalik M., Kolomuc A. and Karagolge Z., (2010), The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students' conceptions of rate of reaction, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 19 (5), 422-433
10. Chairam S., Somsook E. and Coll R. E., (2009), Enhancing Thai students' learning of chemical kinetics, Research in Science and Technological Education, 27 (1), 95-115
11. Chandrasegaran A. L., Treagust D. F. and Mocerino M., (2007), The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students' ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 8 (3), 293-307
12. Cunningham K., (2007), Applications of reaction rate, J. Chem. Educ., 84 (3), 430-433
13. Davis J., (2013), Use of the FAR guide to present a pedagogical analogical model of gel electrophoresis in year 10 science, Teaching Science, 59 (1), 28-31
14. Deters K. M., (2005), Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs, J. Chem. Educ., 82 (8), 1178-1180
15. Eskandar F., Bayrami M., Vahedi S. and Ansar V., (2013), The effect of instructional analogies in interaction with logical thinking ability on achievement and attitude toward chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14, 566-575
16. Green W. J., Elliott C. and Cummins R. H., (2004), Prompted inquiry-based learning in the introductory chemistry laboratory, J. Chem. Educ., 81 (2), 239-241
17. Hake R. R., (1998), Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys., 61 (1), 64-74
18. Harrison A. G. and Coll R. K., (2007), Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms: The far guide-an interesting way to teach with analogies, CA: SAGE Publications
19. Harrison A. G. and Treagust D. F., (2006), Teaching and learning with analogies, in Aubusson P., Harrison A. and Ritchie S. M. (ed.), Metaphor and analogy in science education, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 11-24
20. Justi R., (2003), Teaching and Learning Chemical Kinetics, in Gilbert J. K., De Jong O., Justi R., Treagust D. F. and Van Driel J. H. (ed.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 293-315
21. Kirika Ö. and Bozb Y., (2012), Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13, 221-236
22. Kolomuç A. and Çalik M., (2012), A comparison of chemistry teachers' and grade 11 students' alternative conceptions of 'rate of reaction', J. Balt. Sci. Educ., 11 (4), 333-346
23. Mulford D. R. and Robinson W. R., (2002), An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students, J. Chem. Educ., 79 (6), 739-744
24. Normand M. D. and Peleg M., (2014), Surface area increase by size reduction, the Wolfram Demonstrations Project, Retrieved Oct 29, 2014 from http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/
25. Orgill M. and Bodner G., (2004), What research tells us about using analogies to teach chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 5, 15-32
26. Piquette J. S. and Heikkinen H. W., (2005), Strategies reported used by instructors to address student alternate conceptions in chemical equilibrium, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 42, 1112-1134
27. Sanger M., (2009), How does inquiry-based instruction affect teaching majors' views about teaching and learning science?, J. Chem. Educ., 85 (2), 297-302
28. Sarantopoulos P. and Tsaparlis G., (2004), Analogies in chemistry teaching as a means of attainment of cognitive and affective objectives: a longitudinal study in a naturalistic setting, using analogies with a strong social content, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 5, 33-50
29. Schmitz G., (2005), What is a reaction rate? J. Chem. Educ., 82 (7), 1091-1093
30. Taber K. S., (2002), Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure, Theoretical background, London: Royal Society of Chemistry, vol. 1
31. Treagust D. F., (1988), Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 10, 159-169
32. Van Driel J. H., (2002), Students' corpuscular conceptions in the context of chemical equilibrium and chemical kinetics, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 3 (2), 201-213
33. Venville G. J., (2008), The Focus-Action-Reflection (FAR) guide-science teaching analogies, in Harrison A. G. and Coll R. K. (ed.), Using Analogies in Middle and Secondary Science Classrooms, California: Corwin Press, pp. 22-31
34. Zoller U. and Levy Nahum T., (2012), From teaching to Know to learning to Think in science education, in Fraser B. J., Tobin K. and McRobbie C. J. (ed.), The Second International Handbook of Science Education, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 209-229
35. Zoller U. and Tsaparlis G., (1997), Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: the case of chemistry, Res. Sci. Educ., 27 (1), 117-130