Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 290, Issue , 2015, Pages 32-44

  Sellers, Kristin K ^a,b   Mellin, Juliann M ^a   Lustenberger, Caroline M ^a   Boyle, Michael R ^a,c   Lee, Won Hee ^d   Peterchev, Angel V ^e,f   Fröhlich, Flavio ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain stimulation; Intelligence; IQ; Perceptual reasoning; TDCS; WAIS IV

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC FIELD; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; INTELLIGENCE TEST; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE; WORKING MEMORY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PREFRONTAL CORTEX; THINKING; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; WECHSLER SCALES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929208076     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Prabhakaran V., Smith J.A., Desmond J.E., Glover G.H., Gabrieli J.D. Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: an fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test. Cogn Psychol 1997, 33:43-63.
2. Esposito G., Kirkby B.S., Van Horn J.D., Ellmore T.M., Berman K.F. Context-dependent, neural system-specific neurophysiological concomitants of ageing: mapping PET correlates during cognitive activation. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 5):963-979.
3. Duncan J., Seitz R.J., Kolodny J., Bor D., Herzog H., Ahmed A., et al. A neural basis for general intelligence. Science 2000, 289:457-460.
4. Duncan J., Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci 2000, 23:475-483.
5. Liu J., Zhang M., Jou J., Wu X., Li W., Qiu J. Neural bases of falsification in conditional proposition testing: evidence from an fMRI study. Int J Psychophysiol 2012, 85:249-256.
6. Bunge S.A., Ochsner K.N., Desmond J.E., Glover G.H., Gabrieli J.D. Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind. Brain 2001, 124:2074-2086.
7. Krawczyk D.C., Michelle McClelland M., Donovan C.M. A hierarchy for relational reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Cortex 2011, 47:588-597.
8. Nagahama Y., Okada T., Katsumi Y., Hayashi T., Yamauchi H., Sawamoto N., et al. Transient neural activity in the medial superior frontal gyrus and precuneus time locked with attention shift between object features. NeuroImage 1999, 10:193-199.
9. Hampson M., Driesen N.R., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Constable R.T. Brain connectivity related to working memory performance. J Neurosci 2006, 26:13338-13343.
10. Raichle M.E., MacLeod A.M., Snyder A.Z., Powers W.J., Gusnard D.A., Shulman G.L. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:676-682.
11. Shulman G.L., Fiez J.A., Corbetta M., Buckner R.L., Miezin F.M., Raichle M.E., et al. Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 1997, 9:648-663.
12. du Boisgueheneuc F., Levy R., Volle E., Seassau M., Duffau H., Kinkingnehun S., et al. Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study. Brain 2006, 129:3315-3328.
13. Gray J.R., Chabris C.F., Braver T.S. Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat Neurosci 2003, 6:316-322.
14. Cohen Kadosh R. Modulating and enhancing cognition using brain stimulation: Science and fiction. J Cogn Psychol 2015, 27:141-163.
15. Tremblay S., Lepage J.F., Latulipe-Loiselle A., Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A., Theoret H. The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS. Brain Stimul 2014, 7:773-783.
16. Horvath J., Forte C., Carter O. Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 2015, 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400.
17. Purpura D.P., McMurtry J.G. Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 1965, 28:166-185.
18. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000, 527(Pt 3):633-639.
19. Ali M.M., Sellers K.K., Frohlich F. Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates large-scale cortical network activity by network resonance. J Neurosci 2013, 33:11262-11275.
20. Frohlich F., McCormick D.A. Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron 2010, 67:129-143.
21. Reato D., Rahman A., Bikson M., Parra L.C. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. J Neurosci 2010, 30:15067-15079.
22. Ozen S., Sirota A., Belluscio M.A., Anastassiou C.A., Stark E., Koch C., et al. Transcranial electric stimulation entrains cortical neuronal populations in rats. J Neurosci 2010, 30:11476-11485.
23. Dayan E., Censor N., Buch E.R., Sandrini M., Cohen L.G. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nature Neurosci 2013, 16:838-844.
24. Fritsch B., Reis J., Martinowich K., Schambra H.M., Ji Y., Cohen L.G., et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron 2010, 66:198-204.
25. Antal A., Chaieb L., Moliadze V., Monte-Silva K., Poreisz C., Thirugnanasambandam N., et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms shape cortical plasticity in humans. Brain Stimul 2010, 3:230-237.
26. Chaieb L., Antal A., Ambrus G.G., Paulus W. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: its impact upon neuroplasticity and neuroplasticity inducing transcranial brain stimulation protocols. Neurogenetics 2014, 15:1-11.
27. Glascher J., Tranel D., Paul L.K., Rudrauf D., Rorden C., Hornaday A., et al. Lesion mapping of cognitive abilities linked to intelligence. Neuron 2009, 61:681-691.
28. Kaufman A., Lichtenberger E. Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence 2005, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 3rd ed.
29. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intellignece Scale: Technical and Interpretive Manual 2008, Pearson Education, Inc, San Antonio, TX, USA. 4th ed.
30. Takeuchi H., Taki Y., Kawashima R. Effects of working memory training on cognitive functions and neural systems. Rev Neurosci 2010, 21:427-449.
31. Salthouse T.A., Pink J.E. Why is working memory related to fluid intelligence?. Psychon Bull Rev 2008, 15:364-371.
32. Unsworth N., Engle R.W. On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:1038-1066.
33. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of Psychological Assessment 2003, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 4th ed.
34. Sattler J. Assessment of Children: Cognitive Foundations 2008, Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher. 5th ed.
35. Sattler J. Resource Guide to Accompany Assessment of Children: Cognitive Foundations 2008, Jerome M. Sattler Publisher. 5th ed.
36. Sattler J., Ryan J. Assessment with the WAIS-IV 2009, Jerone M Sattler Publisher, La Mesa, CA.
37. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual 2008, Pearson Education, Inc, San Antonio, TX.
38. Bikson M., Datta A., Elwassif M. Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1033-1034.
39. Poreisz C., Boros K., Antal A., Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull 2007, 72:208-214.
40. Lee W.H., Deng Z.D., Kim T.S., Laine A.F., Lisanby S.H., Peterchev A.V. Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity. NeuroImage 2012, 59:2110-2123.
41. Lee W.H., Lisanby S.H., Laine A.F., Peterchev A.V. Stimulation strength and focality of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic head model. IEEE Eng Med Biol Conf 2014, 2014:410-413. 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943615.
42. Zhang Y., Brady M., Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001, 20:45-57.
43. Yushkevich P.A., Piven J., Hazlett H.C., Smith R.G., Ho S., Gee J.C., et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 2006, 31:1116-1128.
44. Pons J.P., Segonne E., Boissonnat J.D., Rineau L., Yvinec M., Keriven R. High-quality consistent meshing of multi-label datasets. Inf Process Med Imaging 2007, 20:198-210.
45. Team R.C.R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2014, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
46. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1. 1-6. 2014.
47. Halekoh U, Hojsgaard S. pbkrtest: Parametric bootstrap and Kenward Roger based methods for mixed model comparison. R package version 0. 3-8. 2013.
48. Halekoh U, Hojsgaard S. A Kenward-Roger Approximation and Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Tests in Linear Mixed Models-the R Package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software.Submitted.
49. Batsikadze G., Moliadze V., Paulus W., Kuo M.F., Nitsche M.A. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol 2013, 591:1987-2000.
50. Fathi D., Ueki Y., Mima T., Koganemaru S., Nagamine T., Tawfik A., et al. Effects of aging on the human motor cortical plasticity studied by paired associative stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:90-93.
51. Snowball A., Tachtsidis I., Popescu T., Thompson J., Delazer M., Zamarian L., et al. Long-term enhancement of brain function and cognition using cognitive training and brain stimulation. Curr Biol 2013, 23:987-992.
52. Nord C.L., Lally N., Charpentier C.J. Harnessing electric potential: DLPFC tDCS induces widespread brain perfusion changes. Front Syst Neurosci 2013, 7:99.
53. Stagg C.J., Nitsche M.A. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011, 17:37-53.
54. Nitsche M.A., Fricke K., Henschke U., Schlitterlau A., Liebetanz D., Lang N., et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol 2003, 553:293-301.
55. Liebetanz D., Nitsche M.A., Tergau F., Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002, 125:2238-2247.
56. Jacobson L., Koslowsky M. Lavidor M. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 2012, 216:1-10.
57. Stagg C.J., Lin R.L., Mezue M., Segerdahl A., Kong Y., Xie J., et al. Widespread modulation of cerebral perfusion induced during and after transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 2013, 33:11425-11431.
58. Keeser D., Meindl T., Bor J., Palm U., Pogarell O., Mulert C., et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 2011, 31:15284-15293.
59. Falcone B., Coffman B.A., Clark V.P., Parasuraman R. Transcranial direct current stimulation augments perceptual sensitivity and 24-hour retention in a complex threat detection task. PloS One 2012, 7:e34993.
60. Clark V.P., Coffman B.A., Mayer A.R., Weisend M.P., Lane T.D., Calhoun V.D., et al. TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects. NeuroImage 2012, 59:117-128.
61. Sehm B., Schnitzler T., Obleser J., Groba A., Ragert P., Villringer A., et al. Facilitation of inferior frontal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation induces perceptual learning of severely degraded speech. J Neurosci 2013, 33:15868-15878.
62. Pirulli C., Fertonani A., Miniussi C. The role of timing in the induction of neuromodulation in perceptual learning by transcranial electric stimulation. Brain Stimul 2013, 6:683-689.
63. Reinhart R.M., Woodman G.F. Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015, 112:625-630.
64. Zmigrod S., Colzato L.S., Hommel B. Evidence for a role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in controlling stimulus-response integration: a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study. Brain Stimul 2014, 7:516-520.
65. Zmigrod S. The role of the parietal cortex in multisensory and response integration: evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Multisens Res 2014, 27:161-172.
66. Reinhart R.M., Woodman G.F. Causal control of medial-frontal cortex governs electrophysiological and behavioral indices of performance monitoring and learning. J Neurosci 2014, 34:4214-4227.
67. Peters M.A., Thompson B., Merabet L.B., Wu A.D., Shams L. Anodal tDCS to V1 blocks visual perceptual learning consolidation. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1234-1239.
68. Keeser D., Padberg F., Reisinger E., Pogarell O., Kirsch V., Palm U., et al. Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. NeuroImage 2011, 55:644-657.
69. Ohn S.H., Park C.I., Yoo W.K., Ko M.H., Choi K.P., Kim G.M., et al. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory. Neuroreport 2008, 19:43-47.
70. Meiron O., Lavidor M. Unilateral prefrontal direct current stimulation effects are modulated by working memory load and gender. Brain Stimul 2013, 6:440-447.
71. Berryhill M.E., Jones K.T. tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education. Neurosci Lett 2012, 521:148-151.
72. Lally N., Nord C.L., Walsh V., Roiser J.P. Does excitatory fronto-extracerebral tDCS lead to improved working memory performance?. F1000Res 2013, 2:219.
73. Zaehle T., Sandmann P., Thorne J.D., Jancke L., Herrmann C.S. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. BMC Neurosci 2011, 12:2.
74. Mylius V., Jung M., Menzler K., Haag A., Khader P.H., Oertel W.H., et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain perception and working memory. Eur J Pain 2012, 16:974-982.
75. Teo F., Hoy K.E., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Investigating the role of current strength in tDCS modulation of working memory performance in healthy controls. Front Psychiatry 2011, 2:45.
76. Hoy K.E., Emonson M.R., Arnold S.L., Thomson R.H., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Testing the limits: Investigating the effect of tDCS dose on working memory enhancement in healthy controls. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1777-1784.
77. Mulquiney P.G., Hoy K.E., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Improving working memory: exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2011, 122:2384-2389.
78. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Nitsche M., Bermpohl F., Antal A., Feredoes E., et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res 2005, 166:23-30.
79. Jeon S.Y., Han S.J. Improvement of the working memory and naming by transcranial direct current stimulation. Ann Rehabil Med 2012, 36:585-595.
80. Andrews S.C., Hoy K.E., Enticott P.G., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul 2011, 4:84-89.
81. Gladwin T.E., den Uyl T.E., Wiers R.W. Anodal tDCS of dorsolateral prefontal cortex during an Implicit Association Test. Neurosci Lett 2012, 517:82-86.
82. Gladwin T.E., den Uyl T.E., Fregni F.F., Wiers R.W. Enhancement of selective attention by tDCS: interaction with interference in a Sternberg task. Neurosci Lett 2012, 512:33-37.
83. Brunoni A.R., Vanderhasselt M.A. Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Cogn 2014, 86:1-9.
84. Kim J.H., Kim D.W., Chang W.H., Kim Y.H., Kim K., Im C.H. Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: electric field simulation using individual MRI data. Neurosci Leters. 2014, 564:6-10.
85. Frohlich F., Schmidt S.L. Rational design of transcranial current stimulation (TCS) through mechanistic insights into cortical network dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7:804.
86. Herrmann C.S., Rach S., Neuling T., Struber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7:279.
87. Miller E.K., Buschman T.J. Cortical circuits for the control of attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013, 23:216-222.
88. Siegel M., Warden M.R., Miller E.K. Phase-dependent neuronal coding of objects in short-term memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:21341-21346.
89. Duzel E., Penny W.D., Burgess N. Brain oscillations and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010, 20:143-149.
90. Ward L.M. Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes. Trends Cogn Sci 2003, 7:553-559.
91. Uhlhaas P.J., Haenschel C., Nikolic D., Singer W. The role of oscillations and synchrony in cortical networks and their putative relevance for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2008, 34:927-943.
92. Santarnecchi E., Polizzotto N.R., Godone M., Giovannelli F., Feurra M., Matzen L., et al. Frequency-dependent enhancement of fluid intelligence induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials. Curr Biol 2013, 23:1449-1453.
93. Pahor A., Jausovec N. The effects of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on fluid intelligence. Int J Psychophysiol 2014, 93:322-331.
94. Barbey A.K., Colom R., Paul E.J., Grafman J. Architecture of fluid intelligence and working memory revealed by lesion mapping. Brain Struct Funct 2014, 219:485-494.
95. Spearman C. General intelligence objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 1904, 15:201-292.
96. Barbey A.K., Colom R., Solomon J., Krueger F., Forbes C., Grafman J. An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping. Brain 2012, 135:1154-1164.
97. Glascher J., Rudrauf D., Colom R., Paul L.K., Tranel D., Damasio H., et al. Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:4705-4709.
98. Jung R.E., Haier R.J. The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav Brain Sci 2007, 30:135-154. discussion 54-87.
99. Colom R., Haier R.J., Head K., Alvarez-Linera J., Quiroga M.A., Shih P.C., et al. Gray matter correlates of fluid, crystallized, and spatial intelligence: Testing the P-FIT model. Intelligence 2009, 37:124-135.
100. Barbey A.K., Colom R., Grafman J. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human intelligence. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1361-1369.
101. Sternberg R.J., Kaufman S.B. The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.
102. Shaw P., Greenstein D., Lerch J., Clasen L., Lenroot R., Gogtay N., et al. Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature 2006, 440:676-679.
103. Thompson P.M., Cannon T.D., Narr K.L., van Erp T., Poutanen V.P., Huttunen M., et al. Genetic influences on brain structure. Nat Neurosci 2001, 4:1253-1258.
104. Haier R.J., Jung R.E., Yeo R.A., Head K., Alkire M.T. Structural brain variation and general intelligence. NeuroImage 2004, 23:425-433.
105. Colom R., Jung R.E., Haier R.J. Distributed brain sites for the g-factor of intelligence. NeuroImage 2006, 31:1359-1365.
106. Choi Y.Y., Shamosh N.A., Cho S.H., DeYoung C.G., Lee M.J., Lee J.M., et al. Multiple bases of human intelligence revealed by cortical thickness and neural activation. J Neurosci 2008, 28:10323-10329.
107. Hulshoff Pol H.E., Schnack H.G., Posthuma D., Mandl R.C., Baare W.F., van Oel C., et al. Genetic contributions to human brain morphology and intelligence. J Neurosci 2006, 26:10235-10242.
108. Cole M.W., Yarkoni T., Repovs G., Anticevic A., Braver T.S. Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. J Neurosci 2012, 32:8988-8999.
109. van den Heuvel M.P., Stam C.J., Kahn R.S., Hulshoff Pol H.E. Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. J Neurosci 2009, 29:7619-7624.
110. Duncan J. The structure of cognition: attentional episodes in mind and brain. Neuron 2013, 80:35-50.
111. Olesen P.J., Westerberg H., Klingberg T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:75-79.
112. Bikson M., Bestmann S., Edwards D. Neuroscience: transcranial devices are not playthings. Nature 2013, 501:167.
113. Brain blast. Nature 2013, 498:271-272. http://www.nature.com/news/brain-blast-1.13220.
114. Estevis E., Basso M.R., Combs D. Effects of practice on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV across 3- and 6-month intervals. Clin Neuropsychol 2012, 26:239-254.
115. Berryhill M.E., Peterson D.J., Jones K.T., Stephens J.A. Hits and misses: leveraging tDCS to advance cognitive research. Front Psychol 2014, 5:800.