The role of the parietal cortex in multisensory and response integration: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Multisensory Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 161-172

  Zmigrod, Sharon ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binding problem; Event file; Multisensory integration; Non invasive brain stimulation; Posterior parietal cortex; TDCS

Indexed keywords

BRAIN;

BINDING PROBLEM; EVENT-FILE; MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION; NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATIONS; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTICES; TDCS;

INTEGRATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905273917     PISSN: 22134794     EISSN: 22134808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002449     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersen, R. A. (1997). Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 352, 1421-1428. (Pubitemid 27482180)
2. Arend, I., Rafal, R. and Ward, R. (2011). Temporal feature integration in the right parietal cortex, Neuropsychologia 49, 1788-1793.
3. Ashbridge, E., Cowey, A. and Wade, D. (1999). Does parietal cortex contribute to feature binding? Neuropsychologia 37, 999-1004. (Pubitemid 29320042)
4. Behrmann, M., Geng, J. J. and Shomstein, S. (2004). Parietal cortex and attention, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 212-217. (Pubitemid 38479939)
5. Berryhill, M. E., Wencil, E. B., Branch Coslett, H. and Olson, I. R. (2010). A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe, Neurosci. Lett. 479, 312-316.
6. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., De Gelde, B. and Driver, J. (2000). The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention, Percept. Psychophys. 62, 321-332.
7. Bolognini, N., Fregni, F., Casati, C., Olgiati, E. and Vallar, G. (2010a). Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills, Brain Res. 1349, 76-89.
8. Bolognini, N., Olgiati, E., Rossetti, A. and Maravita, A. (2010b). Enhancing multisensory spatial orienting by brain polarization of the parietal cortex, Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 1800-1806.
9. Bolognini, N., Rossetti, A., Casati, C., Mancini, F. and Vallar, G. (2011). Neuromodulation of multisensory perception: a tDCS study of the sound-induced flash illusion, Neuropsychologia 49, 231-237.
10. Brunoni, A. R., Amadera, J., Berbel, B., Volz, M. S., Rizzerio, B. G. and Fregni, F. (2011). A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation, Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 14, 1133-1145.
11. Dutzi, I. B. and Hommel, B. (2009). The microgenesis of action-effect binding, Psychol. Res. 73, 425-435.
12. Esterman, M., Verstynen, T., Ivry, R. B. and Robertson, L. C. (2006). Coming unbound: disrupting automatic integration of synesthetic color and graphemes by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right parietal lobe, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1570-1576. (Pubitemid 44511753)
13. Esterman, M., Verstynen, T. and Robertson, L. C. (2007). Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex, Neuroimage 35, 1247-1255. (Pubitemid 46507811)
14. Evans, K. K. and Treisman, A. (2010). Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features, J. Vis. 10, 6.
15. Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C. and Treisman, A. (1995). Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions, Science 269, 853-855.
16. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes, Vis. Cogn. 5, 183-216. (Pubitemid 128537538)
17. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action, Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 494-500. (Pubitemid 39387844)
18. Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 1067.
19. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. and Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: objectspecific integration of information, Cogn. Psychol. 24, 175-219.
20. Kamke, M. R., Vieth, H. E., Cottrell, D. and Mattingley, J. B. (2012). Parietal disruption alters audiovisual binding in the sound-induced flash illusion, NeuroImage 62, 1334-1341.
21. Malhotra, P., Coulthard, E. J. and Husain, M. (2009). Role of right posterior parietal cortex in maintaining attention to spatial locations over time, Brain 132, 645-660.
22. McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices, Nature 264, 746-748.
23. Metuki, N., Sela, T. and Lavidor,M. (2012). Enhancing cognitive control components of insight problems solving by anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Brain Stimul. 5, 110-115.
24. Mitroff, S. R. and Alvarez, G. A. (2007). Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence, Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 14, 1199-1204.
25. Muggleton, N., Tsakanikos, E., Walsh, V. and Ward, J. (2007). Disruption of synaesthesia following TMS of the right posterior parietal cortex, Neuropsychologia 45, 1582-1585. (Pubitemid 46097014)
26. Müri, R. M., Bühler, R., Heinemann, D., Mosimann, U. P., Felblinger, J., Schlaepfer, T. E. and Hess, C. W. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation, Exp. Brain Res. 143, 426-430. (Pubitemid 34253290)
27. Nitsche, M. A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Tergau, F. and Paulus, W. (2003). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans, Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 2220-2222.
28. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia 9, 97-113.
29. Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal, A. and Paulus, W. (2007). Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients, Brain Res. Bull. 72, 208-214. (Pubitemid 46602748)
30. Priori, A. (2003). Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged noninvasive modulation of brain excitability, Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 589-595. (Pubitemid 36398580)
31. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y. and Shimojo, S. (2000). What you see is what you hear, Nature 408, 788.
32. Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S. and Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration, Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 400-410.
33. Talsma, D. and Woldorff, M. G. (2005). Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1098-1114. (Pubitemid 41045581)
34. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 171-178. (Pubitemid 26168475)
35. Ukueberuwa, D. and Wassermann, E. M. (2010). Direct current brain polarization: a simple, noninvasive technique for human neuromodulation, Neuromodul. Technol. Neural Interface 13, 168-173.
36. Van der Burg, E., Talsma, D., Olivers, C. N., Hickey, C. and Theeuwes, J. (2011). Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects, Neuroimage 55, 1208-1218.
37. Zmigrod, S. and Hommel, B. (2010). Temporal dynamics of unimodal and multimodal feature binding, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 142-152.
38. Zmigrod, S. and Hommel, B. (2011). The relationship between feature binding and consciousness: evidence from asynchronous multi-modal stimuli, Conscious. Cognit. 20, 586-593.
39. Zmigrod, S. and Hommel, B. (2013). Feature integration across multimodal perception and action: a review, Multisens. Res. 26, 143-157.
40. Zmigrod, S., Colzato, S. L. and Hommel, B. (in press). Evidence for a role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in controlling stimulus-response integration: a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study, Brain Stimul.
41. Zmigrod, S., Spapé, M. and Hommel, B. (2009). Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action, Psychol. Res. 73, 674-684.