STI–DUI learning modes, firm–university collaboration and innovation

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 475-492

  González Pernía, José L ^a   Parrilli, Mario Davide ^a   Peña Legazkue, Iñaki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

DUI; Firm university collaboration; Modes of innovation; Process; Product; STI

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; PROCESSING;

DUI; PROCESS INNOVATION; PRODUCT; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; STI; TYPES OF INNOVATIONS; UNIVERSITY COLLABORATIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84929061568     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9352-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy,34(8), 1173–1190.
2. Asheim, B. T., & Parrilli, M. D. (Eds.). (2012). Interactive learning for innovation: A key driver within clusters and innovation systems. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Aslesen, H., Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2012). Modes of innovation and differentiated responses to globalisation: A case study of innovation modes in the Agder region, Norway. Journal of the Knowledge Economy,3(4), 1–17.
4. Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer,39(3), 313–321.
5. Barge-Gil, A., Santamaría, L., & Modrego, A. (2011). Complementarities between universities and technology institutes: New empirical lessons and perspectives. European Planning Studies,19(2), 195–215.
6. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: State-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer,38(1), 1–67.
7. Breznitz, S., & Feldman, M. (2013). The engaged university. Journal of Technology Transfer,37(2), 139–157.
8. Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation,31(8), 362–373.
9. Díaz-Díaz, N. L., Aguiar-Díaz, I., & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2008). The effect of technological knowledge assets on performance: The innovative choice in Spanish firms. Research Policy,37(9), 1515–1529.
10. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy,29(2), 109–123.
11. Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A. (2010). The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations: A firm-level analysis. Research Policy,39(10), 1253–1263.
12. Fitjar, D. R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy,42(1), 128–138.
13. Fukugawa, N. (2013). University spillovers into small technology-based firms: channel, mechanism and geography. Journal of Technology Transfer,38(4), 415–431.
14. Gertler, M. S., & Asheim, B. T. (2006). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–318). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. González-Pernía, J. L., Kuechle, G., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2013). An assessment of the determinants of university technology transfer. Economic Development Quarterly,27(1), 6–17.
16. González-Pernía, J.L., Parrilli, M.D., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2012). Learning modes, types of innovation and economic performance. Orkestra Working Paper Series, number 2012-R01. Accessed December 19, 2013. http://www.orkestra.deusto.es/images/publicaciones/archivos/2012-R01WPS.pdf.
17. González-Pernía, J. L., Peña-Legazkue, I., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2012b). Innovation, entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level. Small Business Economics,39(3), 561–574.
18. Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy,38(3), 495–506.
19. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica,46(6), 1251–1271.
20. Hemert, P., Nijkamp, P., & Masurel, E. (2012). From innovation to commercialization through networks and agglomerations: analysis of sources of innovation, innovation capabilities and performance of Dutch SMEs. The Annals of Regional Science,50(2), 425–452.
21. Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2013). The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer,38(2), 93–115.
22. Howells, J., Ramlogan, R., & Cheng, S. L. (2012). Innovation and university collaboration: Paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics,36(3), 703–721.
23. Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: Case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies,18(12), 1993–2008.
24. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy,36(5), 680–693.
25. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Ladau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–306). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, UK: Pinter.
27. Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2013). Completing the technology transfer: M&As of science-based IPOs. Small Business Economics,40(2), 227–248.
28. Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh-Dole act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer,30(1–2), 115–127.
29. Parrilli, M. D., & Elola, A. (2012). The strength of science and technology drivers for SME innovation. Small Business Economics,39(4), 897–907.
30. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research,14(1), 111–133.
31. Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Li-Ying, J. (2013). The impact of licensed-knowledge attributes on the innovation performance of licensee firms: evidence from the Chinese electronic industry. Journal of Technology Transfer,38(5), 699–715.
32. Woerter, M. (2012). Technology proximity between firms and universities and technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer,37(6), 828–866.