The engaged university

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 139-157

  Breznitz, Shiri M ^a   Feldman, Maryann P ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic development; Technology transfer; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858446269     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9183-6     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Association of University Technology Managers. (2005). Frequently Asked Questions. http://www. autm. net/aboutTT/aboutTT_faqs. cfm#4.
2. Atlas, S. (1996). Yale student's killer convicted once again. New Haven: Yale Daily News.
3. Auburn Technical Assistance Center. (2009). About ATAC from http://www. auburnworks. org/about. cfm.
4. Ball, M. (1999). Is Yale safe? The Yale Herald.
5. Blumenstyk, G. (1990a). After years of stormy relations with City and State, U. of Vermont moves to improve its image and pacify its many critics. The Chronicles of Higher Education, 36.
6. Blumenstyk, G. (1990b). Yale agrees to pay New Haven for some city services. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 36, A30.
7. Borden, G. W., & Fletcher, R. R. (2002). Contribution of the Mohave Generating Station to local economies. University of Nevada, Reno: Reno.
8. Breznitz, S. M. (2000). The geography of industrial districts: Why does the biotechnology industry in Massachusetts cluster in Cambridge? Regional Economic & Social Development. Lowell, University of Massachusetts, Lowell. Master's.
9. Breznitz, S. M. (2007). From ivory tower to industrial promotion: The development of the biotechnology cluster in New haven, Connecticut. Revue dEconomie Industrielle no 120 (4eme trimester): 115-134.
10. Breznitz, S. M., & Anderson, W. (2006). Boston metropolitan area biotechnology cluster. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 28(2), 249-264.
11. Breznitz, S. M., O'Shea, R. P., & Allen, T. J. (2008). University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 129-142.
12. CB Richard Ellis Consulting. (2008). A study of the economic impact and benefits of UC San Diego Fiscal Year 2006-07. CA: San Francisco.
13. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Pergamon Press: Oxford.
14. Cohen, W. (2000). Taking Care of Business. ASEE Prism Online.
15. Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 269-285.
16. Emory University. (2009). Impact on Georgia, from http://whsc. emory. edu/home/about/components-and-figures/impact-on-georgia. html.
17. Etzkowitz, H. (1995). The Triple Helix-university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 9-14.
18. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government relations. Pinter: London, UK.
19. Feldman, M. P. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20. Feldman, M. P. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: Areview of empirical studies. Routledge, 8, 5-25.
21. Feldman, M. P., Breznitz, S. M. (2009). The American Experience in University Technology Transfer. European universities Learn to Compete: From Social Institutions to Knowledge Business. M. McKelvey and M. Holmen, Edward Elgar.
22. Felsenstein, D. (1996). The university in the metropolitan arena: Impacts and public policy implications. Urban Studies, 33(9), 1565-1580.
23. Forest City Enterprises Inc. (2008). History of University Park, from http://www. fceboston. com/portfolio_up_history. asp?node=1.
24. Gannon, J. (2008). Top 50: Region has seen steady shift from manufacturing. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Post Gazette.
25. Goddarrd, J., & Chatterton, P. (1999). Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17, 685-699.
26. Huron Consulting Group. (2008). Strategic economic development: A plan for the Georgia Institute of Technology.
27. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
28. Jensen, R. A., Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2003). Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with'. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1271-1300.
29. Keeble, D. (2001). University and technology: Science and technology parks in the Cambridge region. Cambridge: Center for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
30. Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (2000). High-technology clusters, networking, and collective learning in Europe. England, Ashgate: Aldershot.
31. Kenney, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The university-industrial complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Kenney, M., & Goe, R. W. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professional entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33, 691-707.
33. Kerr, C. (1963). The uses of the university. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
34. Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4), 305-317.
35. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043-1057.
36. Maurrasse, D. J. (2001). Beyond the campus: How colleges and universities form partnerships with their communities. New York: Routledge.
37. Miner, A. S., Eesley, D. T., Devaughn, M., & Rura-Polley, T. (2001). The magic beanstalk vision: Commercializing university inventions and research. Entrepreneurial Dynamic. Stanford: C. B. Schoonhoven and E. Romanelli, Stanford University Press.
38. Minshall, T., Druilhe, C., & Probert, D. (2004). The evolution of "Third Mission" activities at the university of Cambridge: Balancing strategic and operational considerations. 12th High Tech Small Firms Conference. The Netherlands: University of Twente.
39. Missouri State University. (2008). Jordan Valley Innovation Center, from http://jvic. missouristate. edu/.
40. Moreau, R., & Forrant, R. (2008). The university effect: UMass Lowell could help revitalize city housing. The Lowell Sun. Massachusetts: Lowell.
41. Mowery, D., Rosenberg, R. R. et al. (1999). The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U. S. University Research and Technology transfer. Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States.
42. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. O'Mara, M. P. (2004). Cities of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44. O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U. S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
45. Ramos, S. (2002) State: Wal-Mart tops Pa. list of largest private employers. The Daily Pennsylvanian.
46. Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Rodin, J. (2007). The university and urban revival. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
48. Russell, C. (1993). Academic freedom. London: Routledge.
49. Sainsbury, L. (1999). Biotechnology clusters, Ministry of Science.
50. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Scott, P. (1977). What future for higher education. London: Fabian Tracts.
52. Sedgwick, J. (1994). The death of Yale. GQ.
53. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
54. Siegal, D. S., & Phan, H. P. (2005). Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: Implications for entrepreneurship education. University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, Design, and Intellectual Property, 16. Amsterdam: D. G. Libecap, Elsevier.
55. State of Iowa Board of Regents. (2006). Annual economic development and technology transfer report.
56. Taxoma Regional Consortium. (2009). Leveraging the Power of Partnerships. from http://www. trcteam. org/index. asp?Type=NONE&SEC={88AB5185-8A53-4400-912A-54EDE8BA7015}.
57. The ARCHE Report. (2006). Economic Impact.
58. The Austin Chronicle. (2002). Best of Austin 2002, from http://www. austinchronicle. com/gyrobase/Awards/BestOfAustin/?Year=2002&BOACategory=Politics%20%26%20Personalities&Poll=Readers.
59. The University of Nevada, R. (2008). Center for Economic Development, from http://www. ag. unr. edu/uced/.
60. Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2000). Industry perspectives on licensing university technologies: Sources and problems. The Journal of the Association of university technology Managers, 12, 9-23.
61. Wicksteed, S. Q. (1985). The Cambridge phenomenon: The growth of high technology industry in a university town. Segal Quince Wicksteed: Cambridge.
62. Wicksteed, S. Q. (2000). The Cambridge phenomenon revisited. Segal Quince Wicksteed: Histon, UK.
63. Wiewel, W., & Perry, D. (Eds.). (2008). Global universities and urban development: Case studies and analysis. Cities and Contemporary Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M. E. Sharpe.
64. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153.
65. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Peng, Y. (1998). Fundamentals or population dynamics and the geographic distribution of U. S. biotechnology enterprises, 1976-1989. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.