Measuring patient-centered care: An updated systematic review of how studies define and report concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 811-821

  Winn, Karen ^a   Ozanne, Elissa ^b   Sepucha, Karen ^c,d  

^a MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Decisions; Measurement; Patient centered; Quality; Value concordance

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALUE CONCORDANCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE;

EID: 84929043652     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.012     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Institute of Medicine.Committee on Quality Health Care in America Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
2. World Health Organization Health Evidence Network 2015, http://www.euro.who.int/en/data-and-evidence/evidence-informed-policy-making/health-evidence-network-hen [accessed 17.1.15].
3. International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration 2014, http://ipdas.ohri.ca [accessed 17.1.15].
4. Shaller D. Patient-centered care: what does it take: Picker Institute and Commonwealth Fund 2007, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2007/oct/patient-centered-care--what-does-it-take [accessed 18.8.14].
5. US Department of Health and Human Services.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2012 National Healthcare Quality Report 2012, http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqr12/ [accessed 18.9.14].
6. Sepucha K., Ozanne E. How to define and measure concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments: a systematic review of approaches and recommendations for standardization. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 78:12-23.
7. Sepucha K., Fowler F. Measuring decision quality: where we stand today 2013, http://informedmedicaldecisions.org/event/whitepaper-measuring-decision-quality-where-we-stand-today/ [accessed 20.8.13].
8. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice Informed Choice 2012, http://tdi.dartmouth.edu/research/engaging/informed-choice [accessed 5.1.15].
9. Wexler R. Quality matters. Q&A: informing medical decisions. The Commonwealth Fund 2012, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletters/quality-matters/2012/october-november/qa [accessed 5.1.15].
10. Informed Medical Decisions Foundation Affordable Care Act 2013, http://informedmedicaldecisions.org/shared-decision-making-policy/federal-legislation/affordable-care-act/ [accessed 22.8.13].
11. Department of Health Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS, London 2010.
12. NHS Shared decision making 2012, http://sdm.rightcare.nhs.uk/about/about-the-nhs-shared-decision-making-programme/ [accessed 17.1.15].
13. Parliament UK Health and Social Care Act 2012, http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-12/healthandsocialcare.html [accessed 17.1.15].
14. Informed Medical Decisions Foundation What is shared decision-making? 2013, http://informedmedicaldecisions.org/what-is-shared-decision-making/ [accessed 22.8.13].
15. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., The Prisma Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Brit Med J 2009, 339:b2535.
16. Allen J.D., Othus M.K., Hart A., Mohllajee A.P., Li Y., Bowen D. Do men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the "take the wheel" trial. Med Decis Making 2011, 31:108-120.
17. Angelo F.N., Miller H.E., Zoellner L.A., Feeny N.C. "I need to talk about it": a qualitative analysis of trauma-exposed women's reasons for treatment choice. Behav Ther 2008, 39:13-21.
18. Arterburn D.E., Westbrook E.O., Bogart T.A., Sepucha K.R., Bock S.N., Weppner W.G. Randomzied trial of a video-based patient decision aid for bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011, 19:1669-1675.
19. Atchison K.A., Der-Martirosian C., Belin T.R., Black E.E., Gironda M.W. Predictors of risk tolerance among oral surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 68:2947-2954.
20. Bhatnagar V., Frosch D.L., Tally S.R., Hamori C.J., Lenert L., Kaplan R.M. Evaluation of an Internet-based disease trajectory decision tool for prostate cancer screening. Value Health 2009, 12:101-108.
21. Biola H., Sloane P.D., Williams C.S., Daaleman T.P., Zimmerman S. Preferences versus practice: life-sustaining treatments in last months of life in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010, 11:42-51.
22. Björklund U., Marsk A., Levin C., Öhman S.G. Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening - a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 86:390-395.
23. Chang K.Y., Chan K.H., Chang S.H., Yang M.C., Chen T.H. Decision analysis for epidural labor analgesia with Multiattribute Utility (MAU) model. Clin J Pain 2008, 24:265-272.
24. Chu K.H., Tai C.J., Hsu C.S., Yeh M.C., Chien L.Y. Women's preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:138.
25. Costanza M.E., Luckmann R.S., Rosal M., White M.J., LaPelle N., Partin M., et al. Helping men make an informed decision about prostate cancer screening: a pilot study of telephone counseling. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:193-200.
26. Cox R.M., Schwartz K.S., Noe C.M., Alexander G.C. Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients. Ear Hear 2011, 32:181-197.
27. Der-Martirosian C., Gironda M.W., Black E.E., Belin T.R., Atchison K.A. Predictors of treatment preference for mandibular fracture. J Public Health Dent 2010, 70:13-18.
28. Dibonaventura Md., Chapman G.B. Do decision biases predict bad decisions? Omission bias, naturalness bias, and influenza vaccination. Med Decis Making 2008, 28:532-539.
29. DosReis S., Mychailyszyn M.P., Evans-Lacko S.E., Beltran A., Riley A.W., Myers M.A. The meaning of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication and parents' initiation and continuity of treatment for their child. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2009, 19:377-383.
30. Edwards G.L., Barber B.L. The relationship between rejection sensitivity and compliant condom use. Arch Sex Behav 2010, 39:1381-1388.
31. Fiks A.G., Mayne S., Hughes C.C., Debartolo E., Behrens C., Guevara J.P., et al. Development of an instrument to measure parents' preferences and goals for the treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Acad Pediatr 2012, 12:445-455.
32. Fraenkel L., Street R.L., Towle V., O'Leary J.R., Iannone L., Van Ness P.H., et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of a decision support tool to improve the quality of communication and decision-making in individuals with atrial fibrillation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012, 60:1434-1441.
33. Frosch D.L., Bhatnagar V., Tally S., Hamori C.J., Kaplan R.M. Internet patient decision support: a randomized controlled trial comparing alternative approaches for men considering prostate cancer screening. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168:363-369.
34. Gipson J.D., Hindin M.J. "Having another child would be a life or death situation for her": understanding pregnancy termination among couples in rural Bangladesh. Am J Public Health 2008, 98:1827-1832.
35. Gollop S.J., Kyle S.M., Fancourt M.W., Gilkison W.T., Mosquera D.A. Why Taranaki women choose to have a mastectomy when suitable for breast conservation treatment. ANZ J Surg 2009, 79:604-609.
36. Hosain G.M., Sanderson M., Du X.L., Chan W., Strom S.S. Racial/ethnic differences in treatment discussed, preferred, and received for prostate cancer in a tri-ethnic population. Am J Mens Health 2012, 6:249-257.
37. Hsieh M.H., Madden-Fuentes R.J., Bayne A., Munch E., Wildenfels P., Alexander S.J., et al. Cross-sectional evaluation of parental decision making factors for vesicoureteral reflux management in children. J Urol 2010, 184:1589-1593.
38. Hyde M.K., White K.M. Disclosing donation decisions: the role of organ donor prototypes in an extended theory of planned behaviour. Health Educ Res 2009, 24:1080-1092.
39. Hyde M.K., White K.M. Are organ donation communication decisions reasoned or reactive? A test of the utility of an augmented theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model. Br J Health Psychol 2010, 15:435-452.
40. Kaplan C.P., Nápoles A.M., Hwang E.S., Bloom J., Stewart S., Nickleach D., et al. Selection of treatment among Latina and non-Latina white women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011, 20:215-223.
41. Karlström A., Nystedt A., Johansson M., Hildingsson I. Behind the myth - few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery 2011, 27:620-627.
42. Kurd M.F., Lurie J.D., Zhao W., Tosteson T., Hilibrand A.S., Rihn J., et al. Predictors of treatment choice in lumbar spinal stenosis: a spine patient outcomes research trial study. Spine 2012, 37:1702-1707.
43. Landsbergen K.M., Prins J.B., Kamm Y.J., Brunner H.G., Hoogerbrugge N. Female BRCA mutation carriers with a preference for prophylactic mastectomy are more likely to participate an educational-support group and to proceed with the preferred intervention within 2 years. Fam Cancer 2010, 9:213-220.
44. Lee C.N., Chang Y., Adimorah N., Belkora J.K., Moy B., Partridge A.H., et al. Decision making about surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2012, 214:1-10.
45. Leles C.R., Martins R.R., Silva E.T., Nunes M.F. Discriminant analysis of patients' reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism. J Oral Rehabil 2009, 36:909-915.
46. Liao Q., Cowling B.J., Lam W.W., Fielding R. Factors affecting intention to receive and self-reported receipt of 2009 pandemic (H1N1) vaccine in Hong Kong: a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17713.
47. Lurie J.D., Berven S.H., Gibson-Chambers J., Tosteson T., Tosteson A., Hu S.S., et al. Patient preferences and expectations for care: determinants in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 2008, 33:2663-2668.
48. Mathieu E., Barratt A.L., McGeechan K., Davey H.M., Howard K., Houssami N. Helping women make choices about mammography screening: an online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 81:63-72.
49. McCaffery K.J., Irwig L., Chan S.F., Macaskill P., Barratt A., Lewicka M., et al. HPV testing versus repeat Pap testing for the management of a minor abnormal Pap smear: evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73(473-479):481.
50. McLaughlin K., Jones H., VanderStraeten C., Mills C., Visser M., Taub K., et al. Why do patients choose self-care dialysis?. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008, 23:3972-3976.
51. Menard P., Stacey D., Légare F., Woodend K. Evaluation of a natural health product decision aid: a tool for middle aged women considering menopausal symptom relief. Maturitas 2010, 65:366-371.
52. Myers R.E., Hyslop T., Sifri R., Bittner-Fagan H., Katurakes N.C., Cocroft J., et al. Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 2008, 46:S123-S131.
53. Nagle C., Gunn J., Bell R., Lewis S., Meiser B., Metcalfe S., et al. Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458]. BJOG 2008, 115:339-347.
54. Ogilvie G., Anderson M., Marra F., McNeil S., Pielak K., Dawar M., et al. A population-based evaluation of a publicly funded, school-based HPV vaccine program in British Columbia, Canada: parental factors associated with HPV vaccine receipt. PLoS Med 2010, 7:e1000270.
55. Pautex S., Notaridis G., Déramé L., Zulian G.B. Preferences of elderly cancer patients in their advance directives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010, 74:61-65.
56. Peate M., Meiser B., Friedlander M., Zorbas H., Rovelli S., Sansom-Daly U., et al. It's now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer - an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:1670-1677.
57. Powell A.A., Burgess D.J., Vernon S.W., Griffin J.M., Grill J.P., Noorbaloochi S., et al. Colorectal cancer screening mode preferences among US veterans. Prev Med 2009, 49:442-448.
58. Sawka A.M., Straus S., Rotstein L., Brierley J.D., Tsang R.W., Asa S., et al. Randomized controlled trial of a computerized decision aid on adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment for patients with early-stage papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30:2906-2911.
59. Schroy P.C., Emmons K., Peters E., Glick J.T., Robinson P.A., Lydotes M.A., et al. The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making 2011, 31:93-107.
60. Schwalm J.D., Stacey D., Pericak D., Natarajan M.K. Radial artery versus femoral artery access options in coronary angiogram procedures: randomized controlled trial of a patient-decision aid. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012, 5:260-266.
61. Scoville E.A., Ponce de Leon Lovaton P., Shah N.D., Pencille L.J., Montori V.M. Why do women reject bisphosphonates for osteoporosis? A videographic study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18468.
62. Silveira M.J., Kim S.Y., Langa K.M. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1211-1218.
63. Slot K.B., Berge E. Thrombolytic treatment for stroke: patient preferences for treatment, information, and involvement. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2009, 18:17-22.
64. Smith S.K., Trevena L., Simpson J.M., Barratt A., Nutbeam D., McCaffery K.J. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J 2010, 341:c5370.
65. Solberg L.I., Asche S.E., Anderson L.H., Sepucha K., Thygeson N.M., Madden J.E., et al. Evaluating preference-sensitive care for uterine fibroids: it's not so simple. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009, 18:1071-1079.
66. Solberg L.I., Asche S.E., Sepucha K., Thygeson N.M., Madden J.E., Morrissey L., et al. Informed choice assistance for women making uterine fibroid treatment decisions: a practical clinical trial. Med Decis Making 2010, 30:444-452.
67. Sommers B.D., Beard C.J., D'Amico A.V., Kaplan I., Richie J.P., Zeckhauser R.J. Predictors of patient preferences and treatment choices for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2008, 113:2058-2067.
68. Steckelberg A., Hülfenhaus C., Haastert B., Mühlhauser I. Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J 2011, 342:d3193.
69. Stoll K., Fairbrother N., Carty E., Jordan N., Miceli C., Vostrcil Y., et al. "It's all the rage these days": University students' attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean birth. Birth 2009, 36:133-140.
70. van den Berg M., Timmermans D.R., Knol D.L., van Eijk J.T., de Smit D.J., van Vugt J.M., et al. Understanding pregnant women's decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health Psychol 2008, 27:430-437.
71. van Vugt H.A., Roobol M.J., van der Poel H.G., van Muilekom E.H., Busstra M., Kil P., et al. Selecting men diagnosed with prostate cancer for active surveillance using a risk calculator: a prospective impact study. BJU Int 2012, 110:180-187.
72. Vandemheen K.L., O'Connor A., Bell S.C., Freitag A., Bye P., Jeanneret A., et al. Randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with cystic fibrosis considering lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 180:761-768.
73. Wakefield C.E., Meiser B., Homewood J., Ward R., O'Donnell S., Kirk J., Australian GENetic testing Decision Aid Collaborative Group Randomized trial of a decision aid for individuals considering genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer risk. Cancer 2008, 113:956-965.
74. Wakefield C.E., Meiser B., Homewood J., Peate M., Taylor A., Lobb E., AGenDA Collaborative Group, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008, 107:289-301.
75. Wakefield C.E., Meiser B., Homewood J., Taylor A., Gleeson M., Williams R., Australian GENetic testing Decision Aid Collaborative Group, et al. A randomized trial of a breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing decision aid used as a communication aid during genetic counseling. Psychooncology 2008, 17:844-854.
76. Warfel R.M., France C.R., France J.L. Application of implicit attitude measures to the blood donation context. Transfusion (Paris) 2012, 52:356-365.
77. Winkler E.C., Reiter-Theil S., Lange-Riess D., Schmahl-Menges N., Hiddemann W. Patient involvement in decisions to limit treatment: the crucial role of agreement between physician and patient. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:2225-2230.
78. Yamasmit W., Chaithongwongwatthana S. Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery. J Med Assoc Thai 2012, 95:619-624.
79. Marteau T., Dormandy E., Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001, 4:99-108.
80. Michie S., Dormandy E., Marteau T.M. The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 48:87-91.
81. O'Connor A.M., Wennberg J.E., Legare F., Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Moulton B.W., Sepucha K.R., et al. Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007, 26:716-725.
82. International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration Updated chapter l: establishing the effectiveness 2012, http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS-Chapter-L.pdf [accessed 19.1.15].