Application of implicit attitude measures to the blood donation context

Transfusion

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 356-365

  Warfel, Regina M ^a   France, Christopher R ^a   France, Janis L ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD DONOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NEEDLE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; SINGLE TARGET IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; ATTITUDE; BLOOD DONORS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855830340     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03271.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ajzen I,. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.
2. France JL, France CR, Himawan LK,. A path analysis of intention to redonate among experienced blood donors: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transfusion 2007; 47: 1006-13. (Pubitemid 46802088)
3. France JL, France CR, Himawan LK,. Re-donation intentions among experienced blood donors: does gender make a difference? Transfus Apher Sci 2008; 38: 159-66.
4. Lemmens KP, Abraham C, Hoekstra T, Ruiter RA, De Kort WL, Brug J, Schaalma HP,. Why don't young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors. Transfusion 2005; 45: 945-55. (Pubitemid 40798786)
5. Armitage CJ, Conner M,. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001; 40: 471-99. (Pubitemid 33597358)
6. Giles M, Cairns E,. Blood donation and Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour: an examination of perceived behavioural control. Br J Soc Psychol 1995; 34: 173-88.
7. Payne BK, Gawronski B,. A history of implicit social cognition: where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going? In:, Gawronski B, Payne BK, editors. Handbook of implicit social cognition: measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. 1-18.
8. Deutsch R, Strack F,. Building blocks of social behavior: reflective and impulsive processes. In:, Gawronski B, Payne BK, editors. Handbook of implicit social cognition: measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. 62-79.
9. Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR,. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009; 97: 17-41.
10. Arcuri L, Castelli L, Galdi S, Zogmaister C, Amadori A,. Predicting the vote: implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Polit Psychol 2008; 29: 369-87.
11. Friese M, Bluemke M, Wanke M,. Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: the 2002 German parliamentary election. Exp Psychol 2007; 54: 247-55.
12. Perkins A, Forehand M,. Implicit social cognition and indirect measures in consumer behavior. In:, Gawronski B, Payne BK, editors. Handbook of implicit social cognition: measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. 535-47.
13. Carlston DE,. Associated systems theory: a systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons. In:, Wyer RS, editor. Associated systems theory: a systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994. p. 1-78.
14. Zajonc RB,. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol 1980; 35: 151-75.
15. Strack F, Martin LL, Stepper S,. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54: 768-77.
16. Masser BM, White KM, Hyde MK, Terry DJ,. The psychology of blood donation: current research and future directions. Transfus Med Rev 2008; 22: 215-33. (Pubitemid 351842625)
17. Farley SD, Stasson MF,. Relative influences of affect and cognition on behavior: are feelings more related to blood donation intentions? Exp Psychol 2003; 50: 55-62. (Pubitemid 38355441)
18. Lemmens KP, Abraham C, Ruiter RAC, Veldhuizen IJT, Dehing CJ, Bos AE, Schaalma HP,. Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education. Br J Psychol 2009; 100: 71-90.
19. France C, France J, Roussos M, Ditto B,. Mild reactions to blood donation predict a decreased likelihood of donor return. Transfus Apher Sci 2004; 30: 17-22. (Pubitemid 38117291)
20. Meade MA, France CR, Peterson LM,. Predicting vasovagal reactions in volunteer blood donors. J Psychosom Res 1996; 40: 495-501. (Pubitemid 26174491)
21. Devos T,. Implicit attitudes 101: theoretical and empirical insights. In:, Crano WD, Prislin R, editors. Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 61-84.
22. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL,. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 1464-80. (Pubitemid 128658112)
23. Wigboldus DH, Holland RW, van Knippenberg A,. Single target implicit associations. 2004. Unpublished manuscript.
24. De Houwer J, Teige-Mocigemba S, Spruyt A, Moors A,. Implicit measures: a normative analysis and review. Psychol Bull 2009; 135: 347-68.
25. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN,. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention; 2001.
26. Bradley MM, Lang PJ,. Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report C-1) The Center for Research in Psychphysiology. Gainesville: University of Florida; 1999.
27. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR,. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 85: 197-216. (Pubitemid 37394958)
28. Bluemke M, Friese M,. Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. Eur J Soc Psychol 2008; 38: 977-97.
29. Karpinski A, Steinman RB,. The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 2006; 91: 16-32. (Pubitemid 44118153)
30. Kleinknecht RA, Thorndike RM, Walls MM,. Factorial dimensions and correlates of blood, injury, injection and related medical fears: cross validation of the Medical Fear Survey. Behav Res Ther 1996; 34: 323-31. (Pubitemid 26108362)
31. Ballard R,. Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Psychol Rep 1992; 71: 1155-60.
32. Loo R, Loewen P,. Confirmatory factor analyses of scores from full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Appl Soc Psychol 2004; 34: 2343-52. (Pubitemid 40224525)
33. Loo R, Thorpe K,. Confirmatory factor analyses of the full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Soc Psychol 2000; 140: 628-35.
34. Breckler SJ, Wiggins EC,. Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol 1989; 25: 253-71.
35. Shiv B, Fedorikhin A,. Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2002; 87: 342-70.
36. Wilson TD, Schooler JW,. Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 60: 181-92.
37. Nosek BA, Smyth FL,. A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test: implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Exp Psychol 2007; 54: 14-29.
38. Perugini M, Rechetin J, Zogmaister C,. Prediction of behavior. In:, Gawronski B, Payne BK, editors. Handbook of implicit social cognition: measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. 62-79.
39. Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN,. What is "special" about face perception? Psychol Rev 1998; 105: 482-98.
40. Glaser WR, Glaser MO,. Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. J Exp Psychol Gen 1989; 118: 13-42.
41. Seymour PH,. Stroop interference in naming and verifying spatial locations. Percept Psychophys 1973; 14: 95-100.
42. Streiner DL, Norman GR,. "Precision" and "accuracy": two terms that are neither. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 327-330.
43. Lane KA, Banaji MR, Nosek BA,. Understanding and using the implicit association test: what we know (so far) about the method. In:, Wittenbrink B, Schwarz N, editors. Implicit measures of attitudes. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 59-102.
44. Buchner A, Wippich W,. On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures. Cogn Psychol 2000; 40: 227-59.
45. Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J,. The concept of validity. Psychol Rev 2004; 111: 1061-71. (Pubitemid 39375087)
46. Tuerlinckx F, De Boeck P, Lens W,. Measuring needs with the thematic apperception test: a psychometric study. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 82: 448-61.
47. Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR,. Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005; 31: 166-80. (Pubitemid 40176558)