Preference for one or two hearing aids among adult patients

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 181-197

  Cox, Robyn M ^a   Schwartz, Kathryn S ^a   Noe, Colleen M ^b   Alexander, Genevieve C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b James H Quillen VA Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79952316133     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f8bf6c     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akeroyd, M. A. (2006). The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing. Int J Audiol, 45(suppl 1), S25-S33.
2. Boymans, M., Goverts, S. T., Kramer, S. E., et al. (2009). Candidacy for bilateral hearing aids: A retrospective multicenter study. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 130-140.
3. Brooks, D. N., & Bulmer, D. (1981). Survey of binaural hearing aid users. Ear Hear, 2, 220-224. (Pubitemid 12208142)
4. Byrne, D., Noble, W., LePage, B. (1992). Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 3, 369-382.
5. Carter, A. S., Noe, C. M., Wilson, R. H. (2001). Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 261-272. (Pubitemid 33040912)
6. Chmiel, R., & Jerger, J. (1996). Hearing aid use, central auditory disorder, and hearing handicap in elderly persons. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 190-202.
7. Chmiel, R., Jerger, J., Murphy, E., et al. (1997). Unsuccessful use of binaural amplification by an elderly person. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 1-10.
8. Chung, S. M., & Stephens, S. D. G. (1986). Factors influencing binaural hearing aid use. Br J Audiol, 20, 129-140. (Pubitemid 16037375)
9. Colburn, S. H., Shinn-Cunningham, B., Kidd, G., Jr., et al. (2006). The perceptual consequences of binaural hearing. Int J Audiol, 45(suppl 1), S34-S44. (Pubitemid 44385174)
10. Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 16, 176-186.
11. Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (2002). The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30-35. (Pubitemid 36553874)
12. Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., Beyer, C. M. (2003). Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 404-413.
13. Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., Gilmore, C. A. (1987). Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear, 8(suppl), 119S-126S.
14. Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., Taylor, I. M., et al. (1997). The contour test of loudness perception. Ear Hear, 18, 388-400. (Pubitemid 27467601)
15. Cox, R. M., Hyde, M., Gatehouse, S., et al. (2000). Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21(4 suppl), 106S-115S.
16. Day, G. A., Browning, G. G., Gatehouse, S. (1988). Benefit from binaural hearing aids in individuals with severe hearing impairment. Br J Audiol, 22, 273-277. (Pubitemid 19030828)
17. Dermody, P., & Byrne, D. (1975). Loudness summation with binaural hearing aids. Scand Audiol, 4, 23-28.
18. Dillon, H., Birtles, G., Lovegrove, R. (1999). Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: Normative data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and the Hearing Aid User's Questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 67-79.
19. Dillon, H., & Storey, L. (1998). The National Acoustic Laboratories procedure for selecting the saturated sound pressure level of hearing aids: Theoretical derivation. Ear Hear, 19, 255-266. (Pubitemid 28381657)
20. Erdman, S. E., & Sedge, R. K. (1981). Subjective comparisons of binaural versus monaural amplification. Ear Hear, 2, 225-229.
21. Freyaldenhoven, M. C., Plyler, P. N., Thelin, J. W., et al. (2006). Acceptance of noise with monaural and binaural amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 659-666. (Pubitemid 44596746)
22. Gatehouse, S., Elberling, C., Naylor, G. (1999). Aspects of Auditory Ecology and Psychoacoustic Function as Determinants of Benefits from and Candidature for Non-Linear Processing in Hearing Aids. In A. Rasmussen, P. Andersen, T. Poulsen (Eds). Auditory Models and Non-linear Instruments (pp, 221-233). Denmark: Holmens Trykkeri.
23. Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., Elberling, C. (2006). Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings-2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol, 45, 153-171.
24. Gelfand, S. A. (1995). Long-term recovery and no recovery from the auditory deprivation effect with binaural amplification: Six cases. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 141-149.
25. Gianopoulos, I., & Stephens, D. (2002). Opting for two hearing aids: A predictor of long-term use among adult patients fitted after screening. Int J Audiol, 41, 518-526. (Pubitemid 37391099)
26. Grose, J. H., Poth, E. A., Peters, R. W. (1994). Masking level differences for tones and speech in elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms. J Speech Hear Res, 37, 422-428. (Pubitemid 24116504)
27. Hawkins, D. B., & Yacullo, W. S. (1984). Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 278-286. (Pubitemid 14042211)
28. Humes, L. E., Coughlin, M., Talley, L. (1996). Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 419-427.
29. Hurley, R. M. (1999). Onset of auditory deprivation. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 529-534.
30. Jerger, J., Alford, B., Lew, H., et al. (1995). Dichotic listening, event-related potentials, and interhemispheric transfer in the elderly. Ear Hear, 16, 482-498.
31. Jerger, J., Brown, D., Smith, S. (1984). Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference. Arch Otolaryngol, 110, 290-296. (Pubitemid 14135920)
32. Jerger, J., Silman, S., Lew, H. L., et al. (1993). Case studies in binaural interference: Converging evidence from behavioral and electrophysiologic measures. J Am Acad Audiol, 4, 122-131.
33. Jerger, J., Stach, B., Johnson, K., et al. (1990). Patterns of Abnormality in Dichotic Listening in the Elderly. In J. H. Jensen (Ed). Presbycusis and Other Age Related Aspects (pp, 143-150). Denmark: Danavox.
34. Johansson, M. S., & Arlinger, S. D. (2002). Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise. Int J Audiol, 41, 279-284. (Pubitemid 37408433)
35. Kiessling, J., Muller, M., Latzel, M. (2006). Fitting strategies and candidature criteria for unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings. Int J Audiol, 45(suppl 1), S53-S62. (Pubitemid 44385177)
36. Kobler, S., Rosenhall, U., Hansson, H. (2001). Bilateral hearing aids - Effects and consequences from a user perspective. Scand Audiol, 30, 223-235. (Pubitemid 34019591)
37. Kochkin, S. (2009). MarkeTrak VIII: 25-year trends in the hearing health market. Hear Rev, 16, 12-31.
38. Kochkin, S., & Kuk, F. (1997). The binaural advantage: Evidence from subjective benefit and customer satisfaction data. Hear Rev, 4, 29-34.
39. Koenig, W. (1950). Subjective effects in binaural hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 22, 61-62.
40. Kramer, S. E., Goverts, S. T., Dreschler, W. A., et al. (2002). International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41, 36-41. (Pubitemid 36553875)
41. Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol, 52, 509-516. (Pubitemid 127458600)
43. Noble, W. (2006). Bilateral hearing aids: A review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting. Int J Audiol, 45(suppl 1), S63-S71.
44. Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2006). Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 45, 172-181.
45. Noffsinger, D. (1982). Clinical applications of selected binaural effects. Scand Audiol Suppl, 15, 157-165.
46. Schreurs, K. K., & Olsen, W. O. (1985). Comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aid use on a trial period basis. Ear Hear, 6, 198-202. (Pubitemid 15044294)
47. Silman, S., Gelfand, S. A., Silverman, C. A. (1984). Late-onset auditory deprivation: Effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 76, 1357-1362. (Pubitemid 15192679)
48. Silverman, C. A., & Silman, S. (1990). Apparent auditory deprivation from monaural amplification and recovery with binaural amplification: Two case studies. J Am Acad Audiol, 1, 175-180.
49. Stephens, S. D., Callaghan, D. E., Hogan, S., et al. (1991). Acceptability of binaural hearing aids: A cross-over study. J R Soc Med, 84, 267-269.
50. Stewart, D. O., & DeMarco, J. P. (2006). An economic theory of patient decision-making. J Bioeth Inq, 2, 153-164.
51. Swan, I. R. (1989). The acceptability of binaural hearing aids by first time hearing aid users. Br J Audiol, 23, 360.
52. Vaughan-Jones, R. H., Padgham, N. D., Christmas, H. E., et al. (1993). One aid or two? - More visits please! J Laryngol Otol, 107:329-332.
53. Vestergaard, M. D. (2006). Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol, 45, 382-392.
54. Watson, D., Clark, L. E., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 54, 1063-1070.
55. Wilson, R., Zizz, C., Sperry, J. (1994). Masking-level difference for spondaic words in 2000-msec bursts of broadband noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 236-242.
56. Wilson, R. H., Shanks, J. E., Koebsell, K. A. (1982). Recognition masking-level differences for 10 CID W-1 spondaic words. J Speech Hear Res, 25, 624-628. (Pubitemid 13106525)