Rates of beginning teachers: Examining one indicator of school quality in an equity context

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 226-235

  Gagnon, Douglas J ^a   Mattingly, Marybeth J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

beginning teachers; equity; poverty; school quality; urbanicity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929024639     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2013.878300     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnes, G., & Crowe, E. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
2. Betts, J. R., Rueben, K. S., & Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
3. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement. (Working Paper 23). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, The Urban Institute.
4. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Rockoff, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. (Brief 6). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, The Urban Institute.
5. Chetty, R. R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. (NBER Working Paper No. 17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6. Clark, M. A., Chiang, H. S., Silva, T., McConnell, S., Sonnenfeld, K., Erbe, A., & Puma, M. (2013). The effectiveness of secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows Programs. (NCEE 2013-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
7. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Human Resources, 4, 778.
8. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F. D., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
10. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted: a national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the Highly Qualified Teacher challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11, Article 33. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/
11. DeAngelis, K. J., White, B. R., & Presley, J. P. (2010). The changing distribution of teacher qualifications across schools: A statewide perspective post-NCLB. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18, Article 28. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/722
12. Donaldson, M. L., & Johnson, S. M. (2011). Teach for America teachers: How long do they teach? Why do they leave? Phi Delta Kappan, 93 (2),. 47-51.
13. Elfers, A. M., Plecki, M. L., & Knapp, M. S. (2006). Teacher mobility: looking more closely at "the movers" within a state system. Peabody Journal of Education, 81, 94-127.
14. Graham, S. E., & Provost, L. E. (2012). Mathematics achievement gaps between suburban students and their rural and urban peers increase over time. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.
15. Grigg, W., Moran, R., & Kuang, M. (2010). National Indian Education Study-Part I: Performance of American Indian and Alaska Native students at grades 4 and 8 on NAEP 2009 Reading and Mathematics Assessments. (NCES 2010-462). Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
16. Hanushek, E. J., & Rivkin, S. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. Future of Children 17 (1), 69-86.
17. Hanushek, E., Kain, J. F., OBrien, D. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality. (NBER Working Paper No. 11154). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
18. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
19. Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction: what the data tell us. Phi Delta Kappan, 93 (8),. 47-51.
20. Kaiser, A. (2011). Beginning teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the first through third waves of the 2007-08 Beginning Teacher Longitudinal Study. (NCES 2011-318). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
21. Keesler, V., & Schneider, B. (2010). Estimating cause: Teacher turnover and school effectiveness in Michigan. Evanston, IL: Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.
22. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37-62.
23. Levin, J., & Quinn, M. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. New York, NY: The New Teacher Project.
24. Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80 (3), 44-70.
25. Logan, J. R., Minca, E., & Adar, S. (2012). The geography of inequality: Why separate means unequal in American public schools. Sociology of Education, 85, 287-301.
26. Lu, X., Shen, J., & Poppink, S. (2007). Are teachers highly qualified? A national study of secondary public school teachers using SASS 1999-2000. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 129-152.
27. McClure, C., & Reeves, C. (2004). Rural teacher recruitment and retention review of the research and practice literature. Charleston WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
28. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2010). Who will teach? Experience matters. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
29. New York City Department of Education. (2012). NYC Teaching Fellows program statistics. Retrieved from https://www.nycteachingfellows.org/about/program-statistics.asp
30. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
31. Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane. & G. Duncan. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children (pp. 91-117). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
32. Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, K. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458.
33. Rockoff, J. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247-252.
34. Rondfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2012). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. (Working Paper 70). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
35. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
36. Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L. S., & McKnight, C. C. (2011). Equality of educational opportunity: myth or reality in U.S. schooling? American Educator, 34 (4), 12-19.
37. Strong, M. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring: Assessing the evidence. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Education: Elementary and secondary education: Staff and finances 260. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/education/elementary-and-secondary-education-staff-and-finances.html