Comparative analysis of normalization procedures in TOPSIS method: With an application to Turkish deposit banking market

Informatica (Netherlands)

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 185-208

  Çelen, Aydin ^a  

^a NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Consistency; MADM; Normalization; Performance evaluation; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

CONSISTENCY; MADM; NORMALIZATION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; TOPSIS;

DEPOSITS;

EID: 84928946775     PISSN: 08684952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15388/Informatica.2014.10     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Antuchevičienė, J., Zakarevičius, A., Zavadskas, E.K. (2011). Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods. Informatica, 22(3), 319-338.
2. Antuchevičienė, J., Zavadskas, E.K., Zakarevičius, A. (2010). Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 109-125.
3. Bauer, P.W., Allen, N.B., Gary, D.F., Humphrey, D.B. (1998). Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: a comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Jour nal of Economics and Business, 50, 85-114.
4. Brauers, W.K., Zavadskas, E.K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 443-468.
5. Brauers, W.K., Ginevičius, M.R., Zavadskas, E.K., Antuchevičienė, J. (2007). The European Union in a transition economy. Transformations in Business and Economics, 6(2), 21-37.
6. Chakraborty, S. (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54, 1155-1166.
7. Chakraborty, S., Yeh, C.H. (2007). A simulation based comparative study of normalization procedures in multiattribute decision making. In: Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Data Bases, Corfu Island, Greece.
8. Chakraborty, S., Yeh, C.H. (2009). A simulation comparison of normalization procedures for TOPSIS. In: Computers Industrial Engineering CIE 2009 International Conference.
9. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
10. Chatterjee, P., Chakraborty, S. (2012). Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Materials and Design, 35, 384-393.
11. Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S. (2011). Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Materials and Design, 32, 851-860.
12. Deng, H., (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231.
13. Ertugrul, I., Karakaşoʇlu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702-715.
14. Ginevičius, R. (2008). Normalization of quantities of various dimensions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(1), 79-86.
15. Ginevičius, R., Podvezko, V. (2008). Multicriteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(4), 257-267.
16. Gumus, A.T. (2009). Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4067-4074.
17. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
18. Jüttler, H. (1966). Untersuchungen zur Fragen der Operationsforschung und ihrer Anwendungsmöglichkeiten auf ökonomische Problemstellungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Spieltheorie. Dissertation A an der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität Berlin.
19. Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Banaitis, A., Šatkauskas, G. (2007). Defining the utility and market value of real estate: a multiple criteria approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11(2), 107-120.
20. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M. (1991). Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
21. Körth, H. (1969). Zur Berücksichtigung mehrer Zielfunktionen bei der Optimierung von Produktionsplanen. Mathematik und Wirtschaft, 6, 184-201.
22. Lai, Y.J., Hwang, C.L. (1994). Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
23. Liping Y., Yuntao, P., Yishan, W. (2009). Research on data normalization methods in multi-attribute evaluation. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, pp. 1-5.
24. Migilinskas, D., Ustinovichius, L. (2007). Normalisation in the selection of construction alternatives. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(5-6), 623-639.
25. Milani, A.S., Shanian, R., Madoliat, R., Nemes, J.A. (2005). The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29(4), 312-318.
26. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
27. Özcan, T., Çelebi, N., Esnaf, Ş. (2011). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9773-9779.
28. Pavlicic, D. (2001). Normalization affects the results of MADM methods. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 11(2), 251-265.
29. Peldschus, F. (2007). The effectiveness of assessment in multiple criteria decisions. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(5-6), 519-526.
30. Peldschus, F. (2009). The analysis of the quality of the results obtained with the methods of multi-criteria decisions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(4), 580-592.
31. Peldschus, F., Vaigauskas, E., Zavadskas, E.K. (1983). Technologische Entscheidungen bei der Berücksichtigung mehrerer Ziehle. Bauplanung-Bautechnik, 37(4), 173-175.
32. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
33. Seçme, N.Y., Bayrakdaroʇlu, A., Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Experts Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.
34. Stopp, F. (1975). Variantenvergleich durch Matrixspiele. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Hochschule für Bauwesen Leipzig, 2, 117.
35. Sun, C.C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7745-7754.
36. Sun, C.C., Lin, G.T.R. (2009). Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11764-11771.
37. Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., Zaim, S. (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: an example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3396-3406.
38. Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K., Zagorskas, J. (2006). Sustainable city compactness evaluation of the basis of GIS and Bayes rule. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 10(3), 185-207.
39. Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K., Peldschus, F. (2009). Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Economics of Engineering Decisions, 1(61) 7-17.
40. Viteikiene, M., Zavadskas, E.K. (2007). Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 13(2), 149-155.
41. Wang, T.C., Chang, T.H. (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 870-880.
42. Wang, Y.M., Elhag, T.M.S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309-319.
43. Wang, Y.J. (2008). Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1837-1845.
44. Weitendorf, D. (1976). Beitrag zur Optimierung der räumlichen Struktur eines Gebäudes. Dissertation A, Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen, Weimar.
45. Wu, H.Y., Tzeng, G.H., Chen, Y.H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 10135-10147.
46. Yalçin, N., Bayrakdaroʇlu, A., Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Experts Systems with Applications, 39(1), 350-364.
47. Yeh, C.H. (2003). The selection of multiattribute decision making methods for scholarship student selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4), 289-296.
48. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2008). A new logarithmic normalization method in games theory, Informatica, 19(2), 303-314.
49. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159-172.
50. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2) 397-427.
51. Zavadskas, E.K., Peldschus, F., Ustinovichius, L. (2003). Development of software for multiple criteria evaluation. Informatica, 14(2), 259-272.
52. Zavadskas, E.K., Zakarevicius, A., Antucheviciene, J. (2006). Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions. Informatica, 17(4), 601-617.
53. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antuchevičienė, J., Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronics and Electrical Engineering, 122(6), 3-6.
54. Zeydan, M., Çolpan, C., Çobanoʇlu, C. (2011). A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation. Experts Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741-2751.
55. Zhu, K., Jing, Y., Chang, D. (1999). A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 450-456.