Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods

Informatica

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 319-338

  Antucheviciene, Jurgita ^a   Zakarevicius, Algimantas ^a   Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

congruence of ranking results; COPRAS; MCDM; TOPSIS; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055081895     PISSN: 08684952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aivazian, S.A., Mkhitarian, V.S. (1998). Applied Statistics and Essentials of Econometrics, Junity, Moscow (in Russian).
2. Amiri, M.P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6218-6224.
3. Antucheviciene, J. (2003). Principles of revitalization of derelict rural buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 9(4), 225-233.
4. Antucheviciene, J., Zavadskas, E.K. (2008). Modelling multidimensional redevelopment of derelict buildings. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 35(2/3/4), 331-344.
5. Antucheviciene, J., Zavadskas, E.K., Zakarevicius, A. (2010). Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 109-125.
6. Bindu Madhuri, Ch., Anand Chandulal, J. (2010). Evaluating web sites using COPRAS-GRA combined with grey clustering. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(10), 5280-5294.
7. Bindu Madhuri, Ch., Anand Chandulal, J., Padmaja, M. (2010). Selection of best web site by applying COPRAS-G method. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1(2), 138-146.
8. Boran, F.E., Geņ, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
9. Chang, Ch. H., Lin, J.J., Lin, J.H., Chiang, M.Ch. (2010). Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4642-4649.
10. Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S. (2011). Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Materials & Design, 32(2), 851-860.
11. Deng, H., Yeh, Ch.H., Willis, R.J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers and Operations Research, 27, 963-973.
12. Ginevicius, R., Podvezko, V. (2009). Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian countries by multiple criteria methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(3), 418-436.
13. Ginevicius, R., Zubrecovas, V. (2009). Selection of the optimal real estate investment project basing on multiple criteria evaluation using stochastic dimensions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(3), 261-270.
14. Ginevicius, R., Krivka, A., Simkunaite, J. (2010). The model of forming competitive strategy of an enterprise under the conditions of oligopolic market. Journal of Business Economic and Management, 11(3), 367-395.
15. Hajkowicz, S., Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 255-265.
16. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
17. Ic, Y.T., Yurdakul, M. (2010). Development of a quick reliability scoring decision support system using fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 567-574.
18. Jakimavicius,M., Burinskiene, M. (2009). A GIS and multi-criteria-based analysis and ranking of transportation zones of Vilnius city. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), 39-48.
19. Kalibatas, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Kalibatiene, D. (2011). The concept of the ideal indoor environment in multiattribute assessment of dwelling-houses. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 11(1), 89-101.
20. Kucas, A. (2010). Location prioritization by means of multicriteria spatial decision-support systems: A case study of forest fragmentation-based ranking of forest administrative areas. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 18(4), 312-320.
21. Lai, Y.J., Hwang, C.L. (1994). Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
22. Liaudanskiene, R., Ustinovicius, L., Bogdanovicius, A. (2009). Evaluation of construction process safety solutions using the TOPSIS method. Inzinerine Ekonomika -Engineering Economics, (4), 32-40.
23. Liu, P. (2009). Multi-attribute decision-making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(3), 453-463.
24. Marzouk, M. (2008). A superiority and inferiority ranking model for contractor selection. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 8(4), 250-268.
25. Mazumdar, A., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S.S. (2010). Multicriteria decision-making models for the evaluation and appraisal of teacher' performance. International Journal of Productity and Quality Management, 6(2), 213-230.
26. Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi-Criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
27. Opricivic, S. (2007). A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(3), 363-380.
28. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
29. Podvezko, V. (2011). The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika -Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134-146.
30. Podvezko, V., Mitkus, S., Trinkuniene, E. (2010). Complex evaluation of contracts for construction. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(2), 287-297.
31. Raju, K.S., Kumar, D.N. (2010). Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management, Raj Press, New Delhi.
32. Saremi, M., Mousavi, S.F., Sanayei, A. (2009). TQM consultant selection in SMEs with TOPSIS under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2742-2749.
33. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
34. Van Leekwijck,W., Kerre, E.E. (1999). Defuzzification: Criteria and classification. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 108, 159-178.
35. Ye, F. (2010). An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 7050-7055.
36. Yeh, C.H., Chang, Y.H. (2009). Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operation Research, 194(2), 464-473.
37. Yurdakul, M., Ic, Y.T. (2009). Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(1), 310-317.
38. Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J. (2006). Development of an indicator model and ranking of sustainable revitalization alternatives of derelict property: A Lithuanian case study. Sustainable Development, 14(5), 287-299.
39. Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J. (2007). Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives. Building and Environment, 42(1), 436-451.
40. Zavadskas, E.K, Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Buildings. Technika, Vilnius.
41. Zavadskas, E.K., Zakarevicius, A., Antucheviciene, J. (2006). Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions. Informatica, 17(4), 601-618.
42. Zavadskas, E.K, Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitienė, J. (2009b). Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Informatica, 20(2), 305-320.
43. Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Vilutiene, T. (2009a). Multicriteria evaluation of apartments blocks maintenance contractors: Lithuanian case study. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(4), 319-338.