Effects of crossing distance on performance of the native wildflower Lobelia siphilitica: Implications for ecological restoration

Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society

Volumn 142, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 140-151

  Caruso, Christina M ^a   Benscoter, Allison M ^a   Gale, Nigel V ^a   Seifert, Elizabeth K ^a   Mills, Emily R ^a   Case, Andrea L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

heterosis; hybrid fitness; outbreeding depression; restoration ecology; seed transfer zones

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT RESTORATION; HETEROSIS; NATIVE SPECIES; OUTCROSSING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; SEED COLLECTION;

LOBELIA SIPHILITICA;

EID: 84928939886     PISSN: 10955674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3159/TORREY-D-13-00055.1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BASKIN, J. M. AND C. C. BASKIN. 2004. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 14: 1-16.
2. BEAUDOIN YETTER, R. 1989. The expression of male-sterility in Lobelia siphilitica L. (Campanula-ceae): a life history approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Miami University, OH.
3. BISCHOFF, A., B. VONLANTHEN, T. STEINGER, AND H. MÜLLER-SCHÄRER. 2006. Seed provenance matters-effects on germination of four plant species used for ecological restoration. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7: 347-359.
4. BOHNEN, J. L. AND S. M. GALATOWITSCH. 2005. Spring peeper meadow: revegetation practices in a seasonal wetland restoration in Minnesota. Ecol. Restoration 23: 172-181.
5. BROADHURST, L. M., A. LOWE, D. J. COATES, S. A. CUNNINGHAM, M. MCDONALD, P. A. VESK, AND C. YATES. 2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol. Appl. 1: 587-597.
6. BYERS, D. 1998. Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 644-653.
7. CARUSO, C. M. AND A. L. CASE. 2007. Sex ratio variation in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: effects of population size and geographic location. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1396-1405.
8. CARUSO, C. M. AND A. L. CASE. 2013. Testing models of sex ratio evolution in a gynodioecious plant: female frequency covaries with the cost of male fertility restoration. Evolution 67: 561-566.
9. CASE, A. L. AND C. M. CARUSO. 2010. A novel approach to estimating the cost of male fertility restoration in gynodioecious plants. New Phytol. 186: 549-557.
10. DIGGLE, P. K. 1995. Architectural effects and the interpretation of patterns of fruit and seed development. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 531-552.
11. DUDLE, D. A., P. MUTIKAINEN, AND L. F. DELPH. 2001. Genetics of sex determination in the gynodioecious species Lobelia siphilitica: evidence from two populations. Heredity 86: 265-276.
12. EDMANDS, S. 2007. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol. Ecol. 16: 463-475.
13. EDMANDS, S. AND C. C. TIMMERMAN. 2003. Modelling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 17: 883-892.
14. FENSTER, C. B. AND L. F. GALLOWAY. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Faba-ceae). Conserv. Biol. 14: 1406-1412.
15. GIBSON, D. J., G. SENDOR, J. DONATELLI, S. G. BAER, AND L. JOHNSON. 2013. Fitness among population sources of a dominant species (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) used in prairie restoration. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 140: 269-279.
16. GORDON, D. R. AND K. J. RICE. 1998. Patterns of differentiation in wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana): implications for restoration efforts. Restor. Ecol. 6: 166-174.
17. HIJMANS, R. J., S. E. CAMERON, J. L. PARRA, P. G. JONES, AND A. JARVIS. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
18. HUFFORD, K. M. AND S. J. MAZER. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 147-155.
19. HUFFORD, K. M., S. L. KRAUSS, AND E. J. VENEKLAAS. 2012. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Stylidium hispidum: implications for mixing seed sources for ecological restoration. Ecol. Evol. 2: 2262-2273.
20. JOHNSTON, M. O. 1991a. Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45: 1468-1479.
21. JOHNSTON, M. O. 1991b. Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and Lobelia siphilitica. Ecology 72: 1500-1503.
22. JOHNSTON, M. O. 1992. Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 43: 688-702.
23. LAWRENCE, B. A. AND T. N. KAYE. 2011. Reintroduction of Castilleja levisecta: effects of ecological similarity, source population genetics, and habitat quality. Restor. Ecol. 19: 166-176.
24. LYNCH, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
25. LYNCH, M. AND B. WALSH. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. 980 p.
26. MCKAY, J. K., C. E. CHRISTIAN, S. HARRISON, AND K. J. RICE. 2005. "How local is local?"-a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restor. Ecol. 13: 432-440.
27. MENGES, E. S. 2008. Restor. demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful? Aust. J. Bot. 56: 187-196.
28. MOLANO-FLORES, B. 2004. Breeding systems of plants used for prairie restorations: a review. Trans. Ill. Acad. Sci. 97: 95-102.
29. MONTALVO, A. M. AND N. C. ELLSTRAND. 2000. Transplantation of the subshrub Lotus scoparius: testing the home-site advantage hypothesis. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1034-1045.
30. MONTALVO, A. M. AND N. C. ELLSTRAND. 2001. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Faba-ceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 258-269.
31. MOTTL, L. M., C. M. MABRY, AND D. R. FARRAR. 2006. Seven-year survival of perennial herbaceous transplants in temperate woodland restoration. Restor. Ecol. 14: 330-338.
32. NETER, J., W. WASSERMAN, AND M. H. KUTNER. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. Irwin, Homewood, IL. 1181 p.
33. PARKER, M. A. 1992. Outbreeding depression in a selfing annual. Evolution 46: 837-841.
34. PAUL-VICTOR, C. AND L. A. TURNBULL. 2009. The effect of growth conditions on the seed size/number trade-off. PLoS One 4: e6917.
35. PICKUP, M. AND A. G. YOUNG. 2008. Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic rescue in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptor-rhynchoides (Asteraceae). Heredity 100: 268-274.
36. PICKUP, M., D. L. FIELD, D. M. ROWELL, AND A. G. YOUNG. 2013. Source population characteristics affect heterosis following genetic rescue of fragmented plant populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 280: 2012-2058.
37. PYWELL, R. F., J. M. BULLOCK, D. B. ROY, L. I. Z. WARMAN, K. J. WALKER, AND P. ROTHERY. 2003. Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 65-77.
38. RAABOVÁ, J., Z. MÜNZBERGOVÁ, AND M. FISCHER. 2007. Ecological rather than geographic or genetic distance affects local adaptation of the rare perennial herb, Aster amellus. Biol. Conserv. 139: 348-357.
39. RAABOVÁ, J., Z. MÜNZBERGOVÁ, AND M. FISCHER. 2009. Consequences of near and far between-population crosses for offspring fitness in a rare herb. Plant Biol. 11: 829-836.
40. VANDER MIJNSBRUGGE, K., A. BISCHOFF, AND B. SMITH. 2010. A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11: 300-311.
41. WASER, N. M. AND C. F. WILLIAMS. 2001. Inbreeding and outbreeding, pp. 84-96. In C. W. Fox, D. A. Roff, and D. J. Fairbairn [eds.], Evolutionary ecology: concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, NY.
42. WILLI, Y. AND M. FISCHER. 2005. Genetic rescue in interconnected populations of small and large size of the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Heredity 95: 437-443.
43. WILLI, Y., M. VAN KLEUNEN, S. DIETRICH, AND M. FISCHER. 2007. Genetic rescue persists beyond firstgeneration outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 2357-2364.