The effect of user's perceived presence and promotion focus onusability for interacting in virtual environments

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 50, Issue , 2015, Pages 126-132

  Sun, Huey Min ^a   Li, Shang Phone ^a   Zhu, Yu Qian ^b   Hsiao, Bo ^a  

^a CHANG JUNG CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Presence; Promotion focus; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

USABILITY ENGINEERING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION (HCI); PERCEIVED USABILITY; PRESENCE; REGULATORY FOCUS; SOMATOSENSORY; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES; USER SATISFACTION; USER'S ATTITUDES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STUDENT SATISFACTION; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VALIDITY; VIRTUAL REALITY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; VIDEO GAME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928879785     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aaker J.L., Lee A.Y. Understanding regulatory fit. J.Mark. Res. 2006, 43(1):15-19.
2. Arbaugh J.B. Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: an exploratory study of class discussion patterns and student learning in asynchronous internet based MBA course. SAGE Journals Manag. 2000, 24:213-233.
3. Blascovich J., Loomis J., Beall A. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol. Inq. 2002, 103-124.
4. Boliger D., Wasilik O. Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Educ. 2009, 30(1):103-116.
5. Brenton H., Hernandez J., Bello F., Strutton P., Firth T., Darzi A. Using multimedia and Web3D to enhance anatomy teaching. Comput. Educ. 2007, 49(1):32-53.
6. Brown E., Carins P. Agrounded investigation of game immersion. ACM 2004, 1297-1300.
7. Bruin E.D., Schoene D., Prichierri G., Smith S.T. Use of virtual Reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Z.für Gerontol. Geriatr. 2010, 43(No.4):229-234.
8. Chang Y.J., Chen S.F., Huang J.D. Akinect based system for physical rehabilitation: a pilot study for young adults with disabilities. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2011, 32:2566-2570.
9. Cobb S.V.G. Measurement of postural stability before and after immersion in a virtual environment. Appl. Ergon. 1999, 30(1):47-57.
10. Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety 1975, vol. 1:215-224. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
11. Duarte E., Rebelo F., Teles J., Wogalter M.S. Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment'. Appl. Ergon. 2014, 48(5):1367-1375.
12. Hanson K., Shelton B.E. Design and development of virtual reality: analysis of challenges faced by educators. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2008, 11(1):118-131.
13. Higgins E.T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 1997, 52(12):1280-1300.
14. Higgins E.T., Spiegel S. Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: a motivated cognition perspective. Handbook of Self-regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications 2004, New York: Guilford. R.F. Baumeister, K.D. Vohs (Eds.).
15. Idson L.C., Liberman N., Higgins E.T. Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: a regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. J.Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 36(3):252-274.
16. IJsselsteijn W., Hoogen W.V., Kliment C., Kort Y.D., Lindley C. Measure the experience of digital game enjoyment. Proc. Meas. Behav. 2008, 26-29.
17. ISO 9241-11 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on Usability 1998.
18. Jackson R.L., Fagan E. Collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality. ACM 2000, 83-92.
19. Jin S.A. Ican be happy even when I lose the game: the influence of chronic regulatory focus and primed self-construal on exergamers' Mood. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2010, 13(4):467-471.
20. Jin S.A. It feels right. Therefore, I feel present and enjoy: the effects of regulatory fit and the mediating roles of social presence and self-presence in avatar-based 3D virtual environments. Presence 2011, 20(2):105-116.
21. Juan M.C., Perez D. Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2009, 18(3):232-248.
22. Kinateder M., Müller M., Jost M., Mühlberger A., Pauli P. Social influence in a virtual tunnel fire - influence of conflicting information on evacuation behavior. Appl. Ergon. 2014, 45:1649-1659.
23. Kirmani A., Zhu R. Vigilant against manipulation: the effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. J.Mark. Res. 2007, 44(4):688-701.
24. Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 1998, The Guilford Press, New York.
25. Krijin M., Emmelkamp P.M., Olafsson R.P., Biemond R. Virtual reality expouse therapy of anxiety disorders: a review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 24(3):259-281.
26. Lawson G., Herriotts P., Malcolm L., Gabrecht K., Hermawati S. The use of virtual reality and physical tools in the development and validation of ease of entry and exit in passenger vehicles. Appl. Ergon. 2015, 48:240-251.
27. Lee K.M. Why presence occurs: evolutionary psychology, media equation, and presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2004, 13(4):494-505.
28. Li Z. Anew virtual reality environment used for e-learning. IT Med. Educ. 2009, 448-449.
29. Lin C.J., Ho S.H., Chen Y.J. An investigation of pointing postures in a 3D stereoscopic environment. Appl. Ergon. 2015, 48:154-163.
30. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York. second ed.
31. Pan Z., Yang H.W., Shi J.Y., Cheok A.D. Virtual reality and mixed for virtual learning environment. Comput. Graph. 2006, 30(1):20-28.
32. Sherman W.R., Craig A.B. Understanding virtual reality-interface, application, and design. MIT Press J. 2003, 441-442.
33. Sylaiou S., Karoulis A., Stavropoulos Y., Patias P. Presence-centered assessment of virtual museums' technol. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 2008, 28(4):55-62.
34. Vora J., Nair S., Gramopadhye A.K., Duchowski A.T., Melloy B.J., Kanki B. Using virtual reality technology for aircraft visual inspection training: presence and comparison studies. Appl. Ergon. 2002, 33(4):559-570.
35. Wilson J.R. Virtual environments applications and applied ergonomics. Appl. Ergon. 1999, 30(1):3-9.
36. Witmer B.G., Singer M.J. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1998, 7(3):225-240.
37. Yahaya R.A. An Empirical Study of Blended Learning: Using Virtual Reality in the Marketing Decision Making Classroom 2005, Queensland University of Technology.