The never-ending closure: Constitutionalism and international law

Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 329-367

  Werner, Wouter ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928855202     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511495076.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (120)

1. P. Allott, Eunomia: New Order for a New World Order, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
2. P. Allott, The Health of Nations, Society and Law Beyond the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
3. E.-U. Petersmann, ‘Time for a United Nations “Global Compact” for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of World Wide Organisations: Lessons from European Integration’ (2002) 13 EJIL 621.
4. A.-M. Slaughter, ‘A Global Community of Courts’, (2003) 44 Harvard Int LJ 191
5. A.-M. Slaughter, ‘Judicial Globalization’ (2000) 40 Va JIL 1103.
6. M. Kumm, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’ (2004) 15 EJIL 907.
7. E. De Wet, ‘The Value System of the International Community’, (2006) 19 LJIL 611.
8. H. G. Schermers and N. Blokker, International Institutional Law: Unity Within Diversity(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995).
9. M. Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing Company, 1989).
10. M. Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870-1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
11. B. Fassbender, ‘The UN Charter as Constitution of the International Community’ (1998) 36 Columbia J Trans Law 529-552.
12. J. Brown Scott, The Spanish Origin of International Law: Francisco De Vitoria and his Law of Nations (London: Humphrey Milford, 1934), p. 11.
13. Koskenniemi, A. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations, pp. 353-413.
14. M. Koskenniemi, ‘Legal Cosmopolitanism: Tom Franck's Messianistic World’ (2003) 35 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 471-486.
15. C. Tomuschat, ‘International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century’ (1999) 281 Recueil des cours 63.
16. C. Tomuschat, ‘Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will (1993-1994) 241 Recueil des cours 195-374.
17. B. Simma, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’ (1994) 250 Recueil des cours 217.
18. A. Cassese, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 16.
19. J. Delbrück, New Trends in International Lawmaking - International ‘Legislation’ in the Public Interest (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1997)
20. E. de Wet, ‘The International Constitutional Order’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 51.
21. Simma, A. ‘From Bilateralism’; A. Peters, ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’ (2006) 19 LJIL 579.
22. S. Villapando, L’émergence de la communauté internationale dans la responsabilité des Etats (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2005).
23. A. de Hoogh, Obligations Erga Omnes and International Crimes: A Theoretical Inquiry into the Implementation and Enforcement of the International Responsibility of States (Leiden: Brill, 1996).
24. A. Paulus, Die Internationale Gemeinschaft Im Völkerrecht - Eine Untersuchung Zur Entwicklung Des Völkerrechts Im Zeitalter Der Globalisierung (Miinchen: Beck, 2001).
25. G. M. Danilenko, ‘International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law-Making’, (1991) 2 EJIL 42.
26. C. Tomuschat, ‘Obligations for States without or against their Will’ (1993-1994) 241 Recueil des cours 223.
27. P. Weil, ‘Towards Relative Normativity’ (1983) 77 AJIL 413-425.
28. I. F. Dekker and W. G. Werner, Governance and International Legal Theory(Leiden: Brill, 2004), p. 97-100.
29. Koskenniemi, A. ‘The Gentle Civilizer’, pp. 353-411.
30. C. Tomuschat, ‘International Law’, 249.
31. C. Schmitt, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996).
32. Fassbender, A. ‘The UN Charter’, at 577-593.
33. T. Pogge, ‘Recognised and Violated by International Law: The Human Rights of the Global Poor’ (2005) 18 LJIL 717.
34. T. Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002).
35. M. Byers and G. Nolte, United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
36. R. Foot, N. MacFarlane and M. Mastanduno, US Hegemony and International Organisations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002);
37. N. Deller, A. Makhijani and J. Burroughs, Rule of Power or Rule of Law: An Assessment of U.S. Policies and Actions Regarding Security-related Treaties (New York: Apex Press, 2003).
38. J. Brunee, ‘The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant’ (2004) 15 EJIL 617.
39. J. F. Murphy, The United States and the Rule of Law in International Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
40. J. F. Murphy, The United States and the Rule of Law in International Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
41. N. D. White, ‘The Will and Authority of the Security Council after Iraq’ (2004) 17 LJIL 645.
42. Murphy, A. The United States, p. 350.
43. P. Sands, Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules (London: Allen Lane, 2005).
44. B. MacPherson, ‘Authority of the Security Council to Exempt Peacekeepers from International Criminal Proceedings’ (July 2002) ASIL Insights at http://www.asil.org/insights.htm (last accessed 12 July 2006).
45. J. Habermas, Der Gespaltene Westen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2004), p. 145
46. G. Arangio-Ruiz, ‘The “Federal Analogy” and UN Charter Interpretation, A Crucial Issue’ (1997) 8 EJIL 1.
47. C. Schmitt, Die Wendung zum Diskriminierenden Kriegsbegriff (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003).
48. C. Schmitt, ‘Das Zeitalter der Neutralisierungen und Entpolitisierungen’, reprinted in C. Schmitt, Der Begriff des Politischen, 4th edn, M. Konzett (trans.) (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1963), p. 79-84.
49. Habermas, A. Der Gespaltene Westen, pp. 187-93.
50. A. Gattini, ‘Sense and Quasisense of Schmitt's Großraum Theory in International Law - A Rejoinder to Carty's “Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberal International Legal Order” (2002) 15 LJIL 53.
51. T. Koopmans, Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 245.
52. J. E. Lane, Constitutions and Political Theory (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996).
53. S.L. Elkin and K. E. Soltan, A New Constitutionalism: Designing Political Institutions for a Good Society (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993)
54. L. Alexander, Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
55. G. J. Ikenberry, ‘Constitutional Politics in International Relations’ (1998) 4 EJIR 147-148.
56. C. Reus-Smit, The Politics of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
57. T. Cottier and M. Hertig, ‘The Prospects of 21st Century Constitutionalism’ (2003) 7 Max Planck UNYB 261.
58. J. Klabbers, ‘Constitutionalism Lite’, (2004) 1 International Organizations Law Review 1, 3-4.
59. K. Wellens, Remedies Against International Organisations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
60. M. Delmas-Marty, Trois défis pour un droit mondial (Paris: Seuil, 1998), p. 104.
61. H. Lauterpacht, International Law, Being the Collected Papers of Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, systematically arranged and edited by E. Lauterpacht, QC, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970-1978), p. 26.
62. C. Tomuschat, ‘Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will’, 195-374.
63. T. Franck, Recourse to Force, State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 5.
64. R. MacDonald, ‘The Charter of the United Nations in Constitutional Perspective’ (1999) 20 Australian YIL 205.
65. G. Ress, ‘Interpretation of the Charter’, in B. Simma et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 16.
66. A. Bleckmann and B. Fassbender, Article 2(1)’, in p. 84.
67. J. A. Frowein and N. Krisch, ‘Introduction to Chapter VII’, p. 702.
68. M. Koskenniemi, ‘Review of Bruno Simma (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary’ (1996) 17 Australian YIL 227
69. A. Orford ‘The Gift of Formalism’ (2004) 15 EJIL 179.
70. H. Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre (Wien: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1992, revised reprint from the 1960), pp. 321-343.
71. Hart, A. The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).
72. C. Schmitt, Verfassungslehre (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1928).
73. J. Derrida, ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority’ (1990) 11 Cardozo Law Review 919.
74. S. M. Griffin, American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 6.
75. J. E. Lane, Constitutions and Political Theory (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), p. 10.
76. O. Tans, ‘The Constitutional Theatre’ (2002) 8 Res Publica 231.
77. R. Dworkin, ‘Law as Interpretation’ (1982) 60 Texas Law Review 527;
78. R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1996);
79. R. Dworkin, Law's Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).
80. P. Bobbitt, Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).
81. P. Bobbitt, Constitutional Interpretation (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).
82. Bobbit, A. Constitutional Fate, p. 94.
83. J. E. Alvarez, ‘Judging the Security Council’ (1996) 90 AJIL 1.
84. I. Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 287.
85. M. Koskenniemi, From Apology, ch. 4.
86. D. Kennedy, International Legal Structures (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1987).
87. W. G. Werner, ‘Sovereignty and International Legal discourse’, in I. F. Dekker and W. G. Werner (eds.), Governance and International Legal Theory (The Hague: Kluwer, 2003).
88. Koskenniemi, A. From Apology, p. 193.
89. Klabbers, A. ‘Constitutionalism Lite’, at 37-43
90. J. Klabbers, An Introduction to International Institutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
91. J. Delbriick, ‘Article 24’ in Simma, Commentary, p. 449.
92. D. Sarooshi, The United Nations and the Development of Collective Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 45.
93. E. de Wet and A. Nollkaemper, ‘Review of SC Decisions by National Courts’ (2002) 45 GYIL 166.
94. D. Sarooshi, The United Nations, at pp. 20-49.
95. N. Tsagourias, ‘The Shifting Laws on the Use of Force and the Trivialization of the UN Collective Security System: the Need to Reconstitute It’ (2003) NYIL 56, 61-70.
96. A. Abass, Regional Organisations and the Development of Collective Security, Beyond Chapter VIII of the UN Charter (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), especially ch. 4.
97. I. Dekker and E. Myjer, ‘Air Strikes on Bosnian Positions: Is NATO also Legally the Proper Instrument of the UN?’ (1996) 9 LJIL at 411-416.
98. J. L. Holzgrefe and R. O. Keohane, Humanitarian Intervention, Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 177-204,199.
99. N. D. White, ‘The Legality of Bombing In the Name Of Humanity’ (2000) 5 JCSL 27.
100. F.R. Teson, ‘The Kantian Theory of International Law’ (1991) Columbia Law Rev 53.
101. F.R. Teson, Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1997), pp. 141-142.
102. W. M. Reisman, ‘Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law’, in G. H. Fox and B. R. Roth (eds.), Democratic Governance and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 240-241.
103. W. M. Reisman, ‘Unilateral Action and the Transformations of the World Constitutive Process: The Special Problem of Humanitarian Intervention’ (2000) 11 EJIL 3.
104. M. Koskenniemi, ‘The Lady Doth Protest Too much: Kosovo and the Turn to Ethics in International Law’ (2002) 65 MLR 159.
105. B. Kingsbury, ‘Sovereignty and Inequality’ (1998) 9 EJIL 599.
106. B. Kioko, ‘The Right of Intervention Under the African Union's Constitutive Act: From Non-Interference to Non-Intervention (2003) 85 International Review of the Red Cross 807-821.
107. T. Mulawi, ‘Reimagining African Unity: Some Preliminary Reflections on the Constitutive Act of the African Union’ (2001) 9 African YIL 3.
108. J. L Holzgreve and R. O. Keohane, Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 15-52.
109. United Kingdom Government’. Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania), Merits, Judgment of 9 April 1949 (1949) ICJ Rep. 4-35.
110. S. Chesterman, Just War or Just Peace, Humanitarian Intervention and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 230.
111. Franck, A. ‘Interpretation and Change in the Law of Humanitarian Intervention’, in Holzgreve and Keohane, Humanitarian Intervention, p. 204-205.
112. Franck, A. Recourse to Force, pp. 174-192.
113. Franck, A. ‘Interpretation and Change’, in Holzgreve and Keohane, Humanitarian Intervention, p. 207. http://www.aiv-advice.nl/E1000AD/E113/E113SA.htm.
114. A. Buchanan, ‘From Nuremberg to Kosovo: The Morality of Illegal International Legal Reform’ (2001) 111 Ethics 673.
115. A. Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy and Self-determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
116. A. Buchanan, ‘Reforming the International Law on Humanitarian Intervention’, in Holzgreve and Keohane, Humanitarian Intervention, pp. 130-173.
117. A. Buchanan, ‘Reforming the International Law’, 132.
118. Bobbitt, A. Constitutional Fate, p. 94.
119. G. Teubner, ‘Societal Constitutionalism’, in C. Joerges, I. Sand and G. Teubner (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 8.
120. Orford, A. ‘The Gift of Formalism’, 195.