The competences of the telecollaborative teacher

Language Learning Journal

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 194-207

  O’Dowd, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928760468     PISSN: 09571736     EISSN: 17532167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2013.853374     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agar, M. 1994. The intercultural frame. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 18, no. 2: 221–37. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(94)90029-9
2. Antoniadou, V. 2011. Using activity theory to understand the contradictions in an online transatlantic collaboration between student-teachers of English as a Foreign Language. ReCALL 23, no. 3: 233–51. doi: 10.1017/S0958344011000164
3. Belz, J. 2003. Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7, no. 2: 68–99. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/BELZ/default.html
4. Belz, J. and C. Kinginger. 2003. Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German. The case of address forms. Language Learning 53: 591–647. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00238.x
5. Bredella, L. and H. Christ. 1995. Didaktik des Fremdverstehens – Ein Forschungsprogramm im Rahmen der Graduiertenfoerdungen. Anglistik 5, no. 2: 3–16
6. Buttjes, D. 1991. Culture in German foreign language teaching: making use of an ambiguous past. In Mediating Languages and Cultures, ed. D. Buttjes and M. Byram, 3–16. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
7. Byram, M. 1997. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8. Byram, M. 2008. From Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
9. Byram, M. 2010. Conceptualising intercultural (communicative) competence and intercultural citizenship. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, ed. J. Jackson, 85–97. London: Routledge.
10. Council of Europe. 2001. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/CADRE_EN.asp
11. Dooly, M. 2010. Teacher 2.0. In Telecollaboration 2.0: Language and Intercultural Learning in the 21st Century, ed. S. Guth and F. Helm, 277–304. Bern: Peter Lang.
12. Durant, A. 1997. Facts and meanings in British Cultural Studies. In Studying British Cultures. An Introduction, ed. S. Bassnett, 19–38. London: Routledge.
13. Furstenburg, G. 2010. Making culture the core of the language class: can it be done? Modern Language Journal 94, no. 2: 329–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01027.x
14. Furstenberg, G., S. Levet, K. English and K. Maillet. 2001. Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura Project. Language Learning & Technology 5, no. 1: 55–102. http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/default.html
15. Guichon, N. and M. Hauck. 2011. Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: more in demand than ever. ReCALL 23, no. 3: 187–99. doi: 10.1017/S0958344011000139
16. Hanna, B. and J. de Nooy. 2009. Learning Language and Culture via Public Internet Discussion Forums. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Hauck, M. and T. Lewis. 2007. The tridem project. In Online Intercultural Exchange, ed. R. O’Dowd, 250–9. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. Hempel, R. and U. Stickler. 2005. New skills for new classrooms: training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18, no. 4: 311–26. doi: 10.1080/09588220500335455
19. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). 2008. The ISTE NETS and performance indicators for teachers (NETS•T). http://www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS_for_Teachers_2008_EN.sflb.ashx
20. Johnson, K. 2006. The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 40, no. 1: 235–57. doi: 10.2307/40264518
21. Kelly, M., M. Grenfell, R. Allan, C. Kriza and W. McEvoy. 2004. European Profile for Language Teacher Education. Final Report. http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/doc477_en.pdf
22. Lewis, T., T. Chanier and B. Youngs. 2011. Special issue commentary. Language Learning & Technology 15, no. 1: 3–9.
23. Müller-Hartmann, A. 2012. The classroom-based action research paradigm in telecollaboration. In Research Methods for Online Interaction and Exchange, ed. M. Dooly and R. O’Dowd, 156–92. Bern: Peter Lang.
24. Newby, D., R. Allan, A. Fenner, B. Jones, H. Komorowska and K. Soghikyan. 2007. European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. http://archive.ecml.at/mtp2/fte/pdf/STPExtract.pdf
25. O’Dowd, R. 2003. Understanding ‘the other side’: intercultural learning in a Spanish-English email exchange. Language Learning and Technology 7, no. 2: 118–44. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
26. O’Dowd, R. 2006. Telecollaboration and the Development of Intercultural Communicative Competence. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
27. O’Dowd, R. and P. Ware. 2009. Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22, no. 2: 173–88. doi: 10.1080/09588220902778369
28. Pegrum, M. 2009. From Blogs to Bombs: The Future of Digital Technologies in Education. Perth: University of Western Australia.
29. Pennycock, A. 1994. The Cultural Practice of English as an International Language. London: Longman
30. Roberts, B. 1994. What Works? http://www.iecc.org/discussion/what-works.html
31. Roberts, C., M. Byram, A. Barro, S. Jordan and B. Street. 2001. Language Learners as Ethnographers. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
32. Salmon, G. 2003. E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online (2nd edition). Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
33. Stickler, U. and M. Emke. 2011. Literalia: towards developing intercultural maturity online. Language Learning & Technology 15, no. 1: 147–68. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2011/stickleremke.pdf
34. Thorne, S.L. 2006. Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from In-ternet-mediated intercultural foreign language education re-search. In Internet-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education, ed. J. Belz and S. Thorne, 2–30. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
35. Thorne, S.L., R.W. Black and J. Sykes. 2009. Second language use, socialization, and learning in internet interest communities and online games. The Modern Language Journal 93: 802–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x
36. Tudini, V. 2003. Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology 7, no. 3: 141–59. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pdf/tudini.pdf
37. UNESCO. 2004. Final Report: The Workshop on the Development of Guideline on Teacher Training in ICT Integration and Standards for Competency in ICT. Bangkok: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001356/135607e.pdf
38. UNESCO. 2008. ICT Competency Standards for Teachers: Competency Standards Modules. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156207e.pdf
39. Ware, P. 2005. Missed communication in online communication: tensions in fostering successful online interactions. Language Learning & Technology 9, no. 2: 64–89. http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/default.html
40. Ware, P. and R. O’Dowd. 2008. Peer Feedback on Language Form in International Telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology 12, no. 1: 43–63