Toward Boundedly Rational Analysis

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 637-642

  Icard, Thomas ^a  

^a Baker Hall 135   (United States)

Author keywords

algorithmic level; bounded rationality; categorization; metareasoning; rational analysis; sampling

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMIC LEVELS; ANALYSIS STRATEGIES; BAYESIAN; BOUNDED RATIONALITY; CATEGORIZATION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; FILTER MODEL; METAREASONING; PARTICLE FILTER; RATIONAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84928589625     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The Adaptive Character of Thought. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98(3):409-429.
3. Bowers, J. S. and Davis, C. J. (2012). Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3):389-414.
4. DeGroot, M. H. (2004). Optimal Statistical Decisions. John Wiley & Sons.
5. Eberhardt, F. and Danks, D. (2011). Confirmation in the cognitive sciences: The problematic case of Bayesian models. Minds and Machines, 21(3):389-410.
6. Gigerenzer, G. and Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4):650-699.
7. Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. In Sun, R., editor, The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Modeling, pages 59-100. Cambridge University Press.
8. Icard, T. F. (2013). The Algorithmic Mind: A Study of Inference in Action. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
9. Jones, M. and Love, B. C. (2011). Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4):169-231.
10. Maloney, L. T. and Mamassian, P. (2009). Bayesian decision theory as a model of human visual perception: Testing Bayesian transfer. Visual Neuroscience, 26:147-155.
11. Marcus, G. F. and Davis, E. (2013). How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition? Psychological Science, 24(12):2351-2360.
12. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. W.H. Freeman and Company.
13. Marr, D. and Poggio, T. (1976). From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry. MIT A.I. Memo 357.
14. Movellan, J. R. and McClelland, J. L. (2001). The Morton-Massaro Law of Information Integration: Implications for models of perception. Psychological Review, 108:113-148.
15. Russell, S. and Subramanian, D. (1995). Provably bounded-optimal agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2:1-36.
16. Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., and Navarro, D. J. (2010). Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117(4):1144-1167.
17. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man. Wiley.
18. Tenenbaum, J. T., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., and Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331:1279-1285.
19. Vul, E., Goodman, N. D., Griffiths, T. L., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014). One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples. Cognitive Science. forthcoming.