The miss rate for colorectal adenoma determined by quality-adjusted, back-to-back colonoscopies

Gut and Liver

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 64-70

  Ahn, Sang Bong ^a   Han, Dong Soo ^a   Bae, Joong Ho ^a   Byun, Tae Jun ^a   Kim, Jong Pyo ^a   Eun, Chang Soo ^a  

^a Hanyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Miss rate; Quality

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ENDOSCOPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; RECTUM ADENOMA; RECTUM POLYP;

EID: 84862922101     PISSN: 19762283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.64     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M; Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001;48:812-815. (Pubitemid 32476984)
2. Kapsoritakis AN, Potamianos SP, Koukourakis MI, et al. Diminutive polyps of large bowel should be an early target for endoscopic treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2002;34:137-140. (Pubitemid 34202073)
3. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:125-127.
4. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-28. (Pubitemid 27008981)
5. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 2008;57:1406-1412.
6. Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps: Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:194-199. (Pubitemid 29063468)
7. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-350. (Pubitemid 43381678)
8. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 2008;57:59-64.
9. van den Broek FJ, Fockens P, Van Eeden S, et al. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:288-295.
10. Waye JD, Heigh RI, Fleischer DE, et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:551-556.
11. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Slater R, Sanders DS, Brown S. Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut 2004;53:376-380. (Pubitemid 38241333)
12. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-885.
13. Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2866-2877. (Pubitemid 44902662)
14. Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:883-893. (Pubitemid 351501088)
15. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy: the National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-1981. (Pubitemid 24015040)
16. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005;129:34-41. (Pubitemid 41002040)
17. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96-102. (Pubitemid 46108740)
18. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008;40:284-290. (Pubitemid 351524375)
19. Martínez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, Bhattacharyya AK, Reid ME, Alberts DS. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1077-1083. (Pubitemid 32246661)
20. Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:323-333. (Pubitemid 38280584)
21. Rex DK. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:353-365.
22. Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, Beck GJ. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51(4 Pt 1):433-437. (Pubitemid 30204763)
23. van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, Haile R, Summers R. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up: the Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 1998;115:13-18. (Pubitemid 28307282)
24. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-2541. (Pubitemid 44917501)
25. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33-36. (Pubitemid 30051607)
26. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:965-971. (Pubitemid 44326377)
27. Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al. Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:527-530.