Inter-centre variability of the adenoma detection rate: A prospective, multicentre study

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volumn 45, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1022-1027

  Ricci, Enrico ^a   Hassan, Cesare ^a   Petruzziello, Lucio ^b   Bazzoli, Franco ^c   Repici, Alessandro ^d   Di Giulio, Emilio ^e  

^a MORGAGNI PIERANTONI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d HUMANITAS CLINICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Italy)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adenoma detection rate; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasia; Screening; Withdrawal time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL POLYP; DETECTION RATE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; SCREENING; WITHDRAWAL TIME;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALCOHOL DRINKING; CATHETERIZATION; CECUM; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887161793     PISSN: 15908658     EISSN: 18783562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Edwards B.K., Ward E., Kohler B.A., et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010, 116:544-573.
2. Brenner H., Chang-Claude J., Seiler C.M., et al. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011, 154:22-30.
3. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Anderson J.C., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2009, 104:739-750.
4. Brenner H., Arndt V., Sturmer T., et al. Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy. British Journal of Cancer 2001, 85:972-976.
5. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. New England Journal of Medicine 1993, 329:1977-1981.
6. Kahi C.J., Imperiale T.F., Juliar B.E., et al. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2009, 7:770-775.
7. Muller A.D., Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Annals of Internal Medicine 1995, 123:904-910.
8. Baxter N.N., Goldwasser M.A., Paszat L.F., et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009, 150:1-8.
9. Singh H., Turner D., Xue L., et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006, 295:2366-2373.
10. Robertson D.J., Greenberg E.R., Beach M., et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005, 129:34-41.
11. Lakoff J., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2008, 6:1117-1121.
12. Singh H., Nugent Z., Demers A.A., et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 2010, 139:1128-1137.
13. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2002, 97:1296-1308.
14. Cooper G.S., Xu F., Barnholtz Sloan J.S., et al. Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 2011, PMID 21989586.
15. Singh H., Nugent Z., Demers A.A., et al. Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2010, 105:2588-2596.
16. Baxter N.N., Sutradhar R., Forbes S.S., et al. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:65-72.
17. Kaminski M.F., Regula J.R., Kraszewska E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2010, 362:1795-1803.
18. Bretagne J.F., Hamonic S., Piette C., et al. Neoplasia detection rates after positive fecal occult blood test results are not affected by endoscopy center: a population-based study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011, 74:141-147.
19. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., Cahen D.L., et al. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012, 75:98-106.
20. Hamilton S.R., Vogelstein B., Kudo S., et al. Pathology and genetics: tumours of digestive system: WHO classification of tumours 2000, IARC Press, Lyons, France. S.R. Hamilton, L.A. Aaltonen (Eds.).
21. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. New England Journal of Medicine 2006, 355:2533-2541.
22. Bretagne J.F., Hamonic S., Piette C., et al. Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2010, 71:335-341.
23. Sinn D.H., Chang D.K., Choi W.S., et al. Formal documentation of withdrawal time improves the quality of colonoscopic observation. Hepatogastroenterology 2011, 58:779-784.
24. Taber A., Romagnuolo J. Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2010, 71:782-786.
25. Sawhney M.S., Cury M.S., Neeman N., et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time ≤7minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1892-1898.
26. Corley D.A., Jensen C.D., Marks A.R. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011, 74:656-665.
27. Murray M., Swan A.V., Kiryluk S., et al. The Hawthorne effect in the measurement of adolescent smoking. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1988, 42:304-306.
28. Rex D.K., Alikhan M., Cummings O., et al. Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1999, 50:468-474.