Massively parallel multiplex DNA sequencing for specimen identification using an Illumina MiSeq platform

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Shokralla, Shadi ^a   Porter, Teresita M ^b   Gibson, Joel F ^a   Dobosz, Rafal ^a   Janzen, Daniel H ^c   Hallwachs, Winnie ^c   Golding, G Brian ^b   Hajibabaei, Mehrdad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84928492028     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09687     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bertrand, C. et al. Mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenetic analysis with Sanger and next-generation sequencing shows that, inÁrea de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica, the skipper butterfly named Urbanus belli (family Hesperiidae) comprises three morphologically cryptic species. BMCEvol. Biol. 14, 153 (2014).
2. Chacón, I. A., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., Sullivan, J. B. & Hajibabaei, M. Cryptic species within cryptic moths: New species of Dunama Schaus (Notodontidae, Nystaleinae) in Costa Rica. ZooKeys 264, 11-45 (2013).
3. Decaëns, T., Porco, D., Rougerie, R., Brown, G. G. & James, S. W. Potential of DNAbarcoding for earthworm research in taxonomy and ecology. Appl. Soil Ecol. 65, 35-42 (2013).
4. Janzen, D. H. et al. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 360, 1835-1845 (2005).
5. Janzen, D. H. et al. Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity. Mol. Ecol. Res. 9 Suppl s1, , 1-26 (2009).
6. VanHoudt, J. K., Breman, F. C., Virgilio, M. &DeMeyer, M. Recovering fullDNA barcodes from natural history collections of Tephritid fruitflies (Tephritidae, Diptera) using mini barcodes. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10, 459-465 (2010).
7. Wallace, L. J. et al. DNA barcodes for everyday life: Routine authentication of Natural Health Products. Food Res. Int. 49, 446-452 (2012).
8. Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & de Waard, J. R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 270, 313-321 (2003).
9. Schoch, C. L. et al.Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6241-6246 (2012).
10. CBOL PlantWorking Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106, 12794-12797 (2009).
11. Maidak, B. L. et al. The Ribosomal Database Project. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3485-3487 (1994).
12. Savolainen, V., Cowan, R. S., Vogler, A. P., Roderick, G. K. & Lane, R. Towards writing the encyclopedia of life: An introduction to DNA barcoding. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 360, 1805-1811 (2005).
13. Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G. A., Clare, E. L. & Hebert, P. D. N. Design and applicability of DNA arrays and DNA barcodes in biodiversity monitoring. BMC Biol. 5, 24 (2007).
14. Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. N. BOLD: The barcode of life data system (www. barcodinglife.org). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 355-364 (2007).
15. Meyer, C. P. & Paulay, G. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3, e422 (2005).
16. DeWalt, R. E. DNA barcoding: A taxonomic point of view. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 30, 174-181 (2011).
17. Kvist, S. Barcoding in the dark?: A critical view of the sufficiency of zoological DNA barcoding databases and a plea for broader integration of taxonomic knowledge. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 39-45 (2013).
18. Kvist, S., Oceguera-Figueroa, A., Siddall, M. E. & Erseús, C. Barcoding, types and the Hirudo files: Using information content to critically evaluate the identity of DNA barcodes. Mitochondr. DNA 21, 198-205 (2010).
19. Gibson, J. et al. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(22), 8007-8012. (2014).
20. Hajibabaei, M., Shokralla, S., Zhou, X., Singer, G. A. C. & Baird, D. J. Environmental barcoding: A next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS One 6, e17497 (2011).
21. Ranasinghe, J. A., Stein, E. D., Miller, P. E. &Weisberg, S. B. Performance of two southern California benthic community condition indices using species abundance and presence-only data: Relevance to DNA barcoding. PLoS One 7, e40875 (2012).
22. Fonseca, V. G. et al. Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity. Nature Comm. 1, 98 (2010).
23. Laforest, B. J. et al. Insights into biodiversity sampling strategies for freshwater microinvertebrate faunas through bioblitz campaigns and DNA barcoding. BMC Ecol. 13, 13 (2013).
24. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467 (1977).
25. Polz, M. F. & Cavanaugh, C. M. Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3724-3730 (1998).
26. Shokralla, S. et al. Next-generation DNA barcoding: Using next-generation sequencing to enhance and accelerate DNA barcode capture from single specimens. Mol. Ecol. Res. 14, 892-901 (2014).
27. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotech. 3, 294-299 (1994).
28. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
29. Ekrem, T., Willassen, E. & Stur, E. A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43, 530-542 (2007).
30. Costa, F. O. et al. A ranking system for reference libraries of DNA barcodes: Application to marine fish species from Portugal. PLoS One 7, e35858 (2012).
31. Hernández-Triana, L. M. et al. Recovery of DNA barcodes from blackfly museum specimens (Diptera: Simuliidae) using primer sets that target a variety of sequence lengths. Mol. Ecol. Res. 14, 508-518 (2014).
32. Hebert, P. D. N. et al.ADNA'barcode blitz': Rapid digitization and sequencing of a natural history collection. PLoS One 8, e68535 (2013).
33. Smith, M. A. et al.Wolbachia and DNA barcoding insects: Patterns, potential, and problems. PLoS One7, e36514 (2012).
34. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17.1, 10-12 (2011).
35. Li,W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658-1659 (2006).
36. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460-2461 (2010).
37. Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194-2200 (2011).