Changes in inorganic fine particulate matter sensitivities to precursors due to large-scale us emissions reductions

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 4834-4841

  Holt, Jareth ^a   Selin, Noelle E ^a   Solomon, Susan ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; AMMONIA; NITROGEN OXIDES;

AQUEOUS PHASE; CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; LOW EMISSION; NOX EMISSIONS; SO2 EMISSIONS; SO2 OXIDATION;

PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

AMMONIA; NITRATE; SULFUR DIOXIDE; AIR POLLUTANT; NITROGEN OXIDE; PARTICULATE MATTER;

ACIDIFICATION; AIR QUALITY; AMMONIA; EMISSION CONTROL; NITROGEN OXIDES; PARTICULATE MATTER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

ACIDITY; AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; OXIDATION; PARTICULATE MATTER; UNITED STATES; WINTER; AIR POLLUTANT; ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PARTICLE SIZE; SEASON; THEORETICAL MODEL;

MIDWEST; UNITED STATES;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN OXIDES; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; SEASONS; SULFUR DIOXIDE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84928399565     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00008     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Pope, C. A. Review: Epidemiological Basis for Particulate Air Pollution Health Standards Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2000, 32, 4-14
2. US Environmental Protection Agency. National Emissions Inventory(NEI) air pollutant emissions trends data. http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/trends/ (accessed Nov 24, 2014).
3. Ansari, A. S.; Pandis, S. N. Response of Inorganic PM to Precursor Concentrations Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2706-2714
4. Takahama, S.; Wittig, A. E.; Vayenas, D. V.; Davidson, C. I.; Pandis, S. N. Modeling the diurnal variation of nitrate during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109 D16S06
5. Pinder, R. W.; Adams, P. J.; Pandis, S. N. Ammonia Emission Controls as a Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Atmospheric Particulate Matter in the Eastern United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 380-386
6. Makar, P. A.; Moran, M. D.; Zheng, Q.; Cousineau, S.; Sassi, M.; Duhamel, A.; Besner, M.; Davignon, D.; Crevier, L.-P.; Bouchet, V. S. Modelling the impacts of ammonia emissions reductions on North American air quality Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 7183-7212
7. 2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 5877-5903
8. Paulot, F.; Jacob, D. J. Hidden Cost of U.S. Agricultural Exports: Particulate Matter from Ammonia Emissions Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 903-908
9. West, J.; Ansari, A.; Pandis, S. Marginal PM2.5: Nonlinear Aerosol Mass Response to Sulfate Reductions in the Eastern United States J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 1415-1424
10. Manktelow, P. T.; Mann, G. W.; Carslaw, K. S.; Spracklen, D. V.; Chipperfield, M. P. Regional and global trends in sulfate aerosol since the 1980s Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34 L14803
11. Leibensperger, E. M.; Mickley, L. J.; Jacob, D. J.; Barrett, S. R. H. Intercontinental influence of NOx and CO emissions on particulate matter air quality Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 3318-3324
12. Muller, N. Z.; Mendelsohn, R. Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2007, 54, 1-14
13. Caiazzo, F.; Ashok, A.; Waitz, I. A.; Yim, S. H. L.; Barrett, S. R. H. Air pollution and early deaths in the United States. Part I: Quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2005 Atmos. Environ. 2013, 79, 198-208
14. Hakami, A.; Odman, M. T.; Russell, A. G. High-Order, Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multidimensional Air Quality Models Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2442-2452
15. Hakami, A. Nonlinearity in atmospheric response: A direct sensitivity analysis approach J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109 D15303
16. Wagstrom, K. M.; Pandis, S. N.; Yarwood, G.; Wilson, G. M.; Morris, R. E. Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 5650-5659
17. Zhang, W.; Capps, S. L.; Hu, Y.; Nenes, A.; Napelenok, S. L.; Russell, A. G. Development of the high-order decoupled direct method in three dimensions for particulate matter: enabling advanced sensitivity analysis in air quality models Geosci. Model Dev. 2012, 5, 355-368
18. Hakami, A.; Henze, D. K.; Seinfeld, J. H.; Singh, K.; Sandu, A.; Kim, S.; Li, Q. The Adjoint of CMAQ Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 7807-7817
19. Henze, D. K.; Hakami, A.; Seinfeld, J. H. Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7, 2413-2433
20. Muller, N. Z.; Mendelsohn, R.; Nordhaus, W. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy Am. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101, 1649-1675
21. Muller, N. Z. Linking Policy to Statistical Uncertainty in Air Pollution Damages Linking Policy to Statistical Uncertainty in Air Pollution Damages B. E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 2011, 11 32
22. 2.5-related health benefits of emission reductions for 17 industrial, area and mobile emission sectors across the U.S Environ. Int. 2012, 49, 141-151
23. Fann, N.; Fulcher, C. M.; Baker, K. The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3580-3589
24. Fann, N.; Fulcher, C. M.; Hubbell, B. J. The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2009, 2, 169-176
25. Technical Support Document for the Proposed PM NAAQS Rule; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2006.
26. Bey, I.; Jacob, D. J.; Yantosca, R. M.; Logan, J. A.; Field, B. D.; Fiore, A. M.; Li, Q.; Liu, H. Y.; Mickley, L. J.; Schultz, M. G. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 23073-23095
27. Park, R. J.; Jacob, D. J.; Field, B. D.; Yantosca, R. M.; Chin, M. Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols in the United States: Implications for policy J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 2004, 109 D15204
28. Walker, J. M.; Philip, S.; Martin, R. V.; Seinfeld, J. H. Simulation of nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium aerosols over the United States Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 11213-11227
29. Heald, C. L.; Collett, J. L. J.; Lee, T.; Benedict, K. B.; Schwandner, F. M.; Li, Y.; Clarisse, L.; Hurtmans, D. R.; Van Damme, M.; Clerbaux, C. Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 10295-10312
30. Pye, H. O. T.; Liao, H.; Wu, S.; Mickley, L. J.; Jacob, D. J.; Henze, D. K.; Seinfeld, J. H. Effect of changes in climate and emissions on future sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosol levels in the United States J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 2009, 114 D01205
31. Leibensperger, E. M.; Mickley, L. J.; Jacob, D. J.; Chen, W.-T.; Seinfeld, J. H.; Nenes, A.; Adams, P. J.; Streets, D. G.; Kumar, N.; Rind, D. Climatic effects of 1950-2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols-Part 2: Climate response Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 3349-3362
32. Leibensperger, E. M.; Mickley, L. J.; Jacob, D. J.; Chen, W.-T.; Seinfeld, J. H.; Nenes, A.; Adams, P. J.; Streets, D. G.; Kumar, N.; Rind, D. Climatic effects of 1950-2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols-Part 1: Aerosol trends and radiative forcing Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 3333-3348
33. 2O aerosols Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7, 4639-4659
34. Wang, Y. X. A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109 D22307
35. Zhang, Y.; Jaeglé, L.; van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R. V.; Holmes, C. D.; Amos, H. M.; Wang, Q.; Talbot, R.; Artz, R.; Brooks, S. Nested-grid simulation of mercury over North America Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 6095-6111
36. Hudman, R. C.; Moore, N. E.; Martin, R. V.; Russell, A. R.; Mebust, A. K.; Valin, L. C.; Cohen, R. C. A mechanistic model of global soil nitric oxide emissions: implementation and space based-constraints Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2012, 12, 3555-3594
37. Liu, S.; Liang, X.-Z. Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Height J. Clim. 2010, 23, 5790-5809
38. Zhang, L.; Jacob, D. J.; Knipping, E. M.; Kumar, N.; Munger, J. W.; Carouge, C. C.; van Donkelaar, A.; Wang, Y. X.; Chen, D. Nitrogen deposition to the United States: distribution, sources, and processes Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 4539-4554
39. 5 by tropospheric aerosol Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 7409-7414
40. Van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R. V.; Leaitch, W. R.; Macdonald, A. M.; Walker, T. W.; Streets, D. G.; Zhang, Q.; Dunlea, E. J.; Jimenez, J. L.; Dibb, J. E. Analysis of aircraft and satellite measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) to quantify long-range transport of East Asian sulfur to Canada Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 2999-3014
41. Pinder, R. W.; Adams, P. J.; Pandis, S. N.; Gilliland, A. B. Temporally resolved ammonia emission inventories: Current estimates, evaluation tools, and measurement needs J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 2006, 111 D16310
42. Tong, D. Q.; Lamsal, L.; Pan, L.; Ding, C.; Kim, H.; Lee, P.; Chai, T.; Pickering, K. E.; Stajner, I. Long-term NOx trends over large cities in the United States during the great recession: Comparison of satellite retrievals, ground observations, and emission inventories Atmos. Environ. 2015, 107, 70-84
43. 2 columns to NOx emission controls on power plants in the United States: 2005-2011 Atmos. Environ. 2013, 81, 102-111
44. 2 observations over the United States: effects of emission control technology and the economic recession Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 12197-12209
45. 2 emissions using OMI retrievals Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38 L21811
46. Malm, W. C.; Sisler, J. F.; Huffman, D.; Eldred, R. A.; Cahill, T. A. Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 1347
47. US Environmental Protection Agency. Daily summarydata forparticulates. http://aqsdr1.epa.gov/aqsweb/aqstmp/airdata/download-files.html#Daily (accessed Nov 24, 2014).
48. Simon, H.; Baker, K. R.; Phillips, S. Compilation and interpretation of photochemical model performance statistics published between 2006 and 2012 Atmos. Environ. 2012, 61, 124-139
49. Seinfeld, J. H.; Pandis, S. N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2012; p 1203.
50. Duncan, B. N.; Yoshida, Y.; Olson, J. R.; Sillman, S.; Martin, R. V.; Lamsal, L.; Hu, Y.; Pickering, K. E.; Retscher, C.; Allen, D. J. Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of NOx and VOC controls on surface ozone formation Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2213-2223
51. Pakkanen, T. A.; Hillamo, R. E.; Aurela, M.; Andersen, H. V.; Grundahl, L.; Ferm, M.; Persson, K.; Karlsson, V.; Reissell, A.; Røyset, O. Nordic intercomparison for measurement of major atmospheric nitrogen species J. Aerosol Sci. 1999, 30, 247-263
52. Schaap, M.; Spindler, G.; Schulz, M.; Acker, K.; Maenhaut, W.; Berner, A.; Wieprecht, W.; Streit, N.; Müller, K.; Brüggemann, E. Artefacts in the sampling of nitrate studied in the "INTERCOMP" campaigns of EUROTRAC-AEROSOL Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 6487-6496
53. Kant Pathak, R.; Chan, C. K. Inter-particle and gas-particle interactions in sampling artifacts of PM in filter-based samplers Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 1597-1607
54. Squizzato, S.; Masiol, M.; Brunelli, A.; Pistollato, S.; Tarabotti, E.; Rampazzo, G.; Pavoni, B. Factors determining the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol: a case study in the Po Valley (Italy) Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 1927-1939
55. Pinder, R. W.; Dennis, R. L.; Bhave, P. V. Observable indicators of the sensitivity of PM2.5 nitrate to emission reductions-Part I: Derivation of the adjusted gas ratio and applicability at regulatory-relevant time scales Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 1275-1286
56. 2 emission reductions Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 1287-1300
57. Bertram, T. H.; Thornton, J. A.; Riedel, T. P.; Middlebrook, A. M.; Bahreini, R.; Bates, T. S.; Quinn, P. K.; Coffman, D. J. Direct observations of N2O5 reactivity on ambient aerosol particles Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 36 L19803
58. Wen, L.; Chen, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Sui, X.; Yao, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, T.; Wang, W. Enhanced formation of fine particulate nitrate at a rural site on the North China Plain in summer: the important roles of ammonia and ozone Atmos. Environ. 2014, 101, 294-302
59. 5: A Review Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 665-695
60. 2 formation, chloride availability, and chlorine cycling in Southeast Texas Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 5476-5488
61. Hudson, P. K.; Schwarz, J.; Baltrusaitis, J.; Gibson, E. R.; Grassian, V. H. A spectroscopic study of atmospherically relevant concentrated aqueous nitrate solutions J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 544-548
62. Archibald, A. T.; Jenkin, M. E.; Shallcross, D. E. An isoprene mechanism intercomparison Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 5356-5364
63. Li, Y.; Henze, D. K.; Jack, D.; Kinney, P. L. The influence of air quality model resolution on health impact assessment for fine particulate matter and its components Air Qual., Atmos. Health 2015, 10.1007/s11869-015-0321-z
64. Thompson, T. M.; Saari, R. K.; Selin, N. E. Air quality resolution for health impact assessment: influence of regional characteristics Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 969-978
65. Punger, E. M.; West, J. J. The effect of grid resolution on estimates of the burden of ozone and fine particulate matter on premature mortality in the United States Air Qual., Atmos. Health 2013, 6, 563-573