Characterizing the PM2.5-related health benefits of emission reductions for 17 industrial, area and mobile emission sectors across the U.S.

Environment International

Volumn 49, Issue , 2012, Pages 141-151

  Fann, Neal ^a   Baker, Kirk R ^a   Fulcher, Charles M ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit per ton; BenMAP; Source apportionment

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY MODELING; AIR QUALITY MODELS; BENEFIT PER-TON; BENMAP; EMISSION CHANGE; EMISSION REDUCTION; EMISSION SOURCES; GENERATING UNIT; GEOGRAPHIC AREAS; HEALTH BENEFITS; HEALTH IMPACT; HUMAN HEALTH; IRON AND STEEL; MOBILE SECTOR; NON-LINEAR CHEMISTRY; PC-BASED; PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING; POINT SOURCES; SOFTWARE PROGRAM; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SOURCE TYPES;

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; EMISSION CONTROL; HEALTH IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; PARTICULATE MATTER; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; POLLUTANT SOURCE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866702061     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abt Co-benefits risk assessment screening model Available at: http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/resources/cobra.html.
2. Ansari A.S., Pandis S.N. Response of inorganic PM to precursor concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 1998, 32:2706-2714. 10.1021/es971130j.
3. Baker K.R., Foley K.M. A nonlinear regression model estimating single source concentrations of primary and secondarily formed PM2.5. Atmos Environ 2011, 45:3758-3767. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.074.
4. Baker K., Scheff P. Photochemical model performance for PM2.5 sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and precursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at background monitor locations in the central and eastern United States. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:6185-6195. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.006.
5. Byun D., Schere K.L. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl Mech Rev 2006, 59:51. 10.1115/1.2128636.
6. ENVIRON User's guide comprehensive air quality model with extensions version 5.30 http://www.camx.com.
7. Fann N., Fulcher C., Hubbell B. The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution. Air Qual Atmos Health 2009, 2:169-176. 10.1007/s11869-009-0044-0.
8. Fann N., Lamson A.D., Anenberg S.C., Wesson K., Risley D., Hubbell B.J. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Anal 2011, (no-no). 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01630.x.
9. Fann N.L., Phillips D.S.B., Jang D.C., Akhtar D.F.H. Comment on "Do some NO(x) emissions have negative environmental damages? Evidence and implications for policy". Environ Sci Technol 2011, 203710. 10.1021/es203710m.
10. Krewski D., Jerrett M., Burnett R.T., Ma R., Hughes E., Shi Y., et al. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Research report 2009, 5-114. Health Effects Institute, (discussion 115-36).
11. Laden F., Schwartz J., Speizer F.E., Dockery D.W. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006, 173:667-672. 10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC.
12. Levy J.I., Baxter L.K., Schwartz J. Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States. Risk Anal 2009, 29:1000-1014. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01227.x.
13. Muller B.N.Z., Mendelsohn R. Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. Environ Stud 2009, 05753:1714-1739.
14. 2 Emissions in Atlanta. BE J Econ Anal Policy 2009, 9(2). [Pages -, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, March]. 10.2202/1935-1682.1954.
15. Muller N.Z., Mendelsohn R., Nordhaus W. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. Am Econ Rev 2011, 101(27). 10.1257/aer.101.5.1649.
16. Mysliwiec M.J., Kleeman M.J. Source apportionment of secondary airborne particulate matter in a polluted atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:5376-5384. 10.1021/es020832s.
17. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Estimating the public health benefits of proposed air pollution regulations 2002, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
18. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Hidden costs of energy: unpriced consequences of energy production and use 2009, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
19. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Improving health in the United States: the role of health impact assessment 2011, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
20. x emission trading. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35:4397-4407.
21. Pope C.A., Burnett R.T., Thun M.J., Calle E.E., Krewski D., Ito K., et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 2002, 287:1132-1141. 10.1001/jama.287.9.1132.
22. Russell A.G. EPA supersites program-related emissions-based particulate matter modeling: initial applications and advances. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2008, 58:289-302. 10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.289.
23. x SIP call, FIP, and Section 126 petitions 1998, (Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/otag/sipriav2.zip EPA-452/R-98-003).
24. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for existing stationary Spark Ignition (SI) RICE NESHAP 2010, (Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/riceriafinal.pdf EPA-452/R-10-010).
25. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Regulatory impact analysis for the proposed federal transport rule 2010, (Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/proposaltrria_final.pdf Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491).
26. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Valuing mortality risk reductions for environmental policy: a white paper Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/pages/MortalityRiskValuation.html.
27. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Guidelines for preparing economic analyses Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/pages/guidelines.html.
28. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Regulatory impact assessment for the cross-state air pollution rule Available at: http://www.epa.gov/airtransport/pdfs/FinalRIA.pdf.
29. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Regulatory impact assessment for the mercury and air toxics standards Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf.
30. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Regulatory impact analysis: national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/boilersriafinal110221_psg.pdf.
31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) 2005 National Emissions Inventory Data & Documentation Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/net/2005inventory.html.
32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) North American Emissions Inventories - Canada Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/net/canada.html.
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) North American Emissions Inventories - Mexico Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/net/mexico.html.
34. Wagstrom K.M., Pandis S.N., Yarwood G., Wilson G.M., Morris R.E. Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model. Atmos Environ 2008, 42:5650-5659. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.012.
35. Woods, Poole Population by Single Year of Age. CD-ROM 2008, Woods & Poole Economics, Inc., Washington, DC.