Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 42, Issue 22, 2008, Pages 5650-5659

  Wagstrom, Kristina M ^a   Pandis, Spyros N ^a,b   Yarwood, Greg ^c   Wilson, Gary M ^c   Morris, Ralph E ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

^c ENVIRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Atmospheric aerosol modeling; Regional air quality; Source apportionment

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOOLEAN FUNCTIONS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; POWER PLANTS; SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

(OTDR) TECHNOLOGY; (SPM) CLASSES; CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODEL (CTM); COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; LOWER COMPUTATIONAL COST; OFF-LINE ALGORITHMS; OFF-LINE VERSION; PARTICULATE MATTER (PM); SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SOURCE LOCATIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D);

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

SULFATE; SULFUR OXIDE;

AEROSOL; AIR QUALITY; ALGORITHM; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT; EMISSION; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; SULFATE; SULFUR DIOXIDE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

AIR POLLUTANT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EXHAUST GAS; ONLINE SYSTEM; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 46749103207     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blanchard C.L. Methods for attributing ambient air pollutants to emission sources. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24 (1999) 329-365
2. Capaldo K.P., Pilinis C., and Pandis S.N. A computationally efficient hybrid approach for dynamic gas/aerosol transfer in air quality models. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 3617-3627
3. Colella P., and Woodward P.R. The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 54 (1984) 174-201
4. Dockery D.W., Pope C.A., Xu X., Spengler J.D., Ware J.H., Fay M.E., Ferris B.G., and Speizer F.E. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. The New England Journal of Medicine 329 (1993) 1753-1759
5. Dunker A.M. Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models. Atmospheric Environment 15 (1981) 1155-1161
6. Dunker A.M., Yarwood G., Ortmann J.P., and Wilson G.M. Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model. Environmental Science and Technology 36 (2002) 2953-2964
7. Environ., 2004. Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) v. 4.10s User's Guide. Environ International Corporation. 〈http://www.camx.com/files/CAMx.User.Guide.v4.10.August2004.pdf〉.
8. EPA, 2005. Health and Environmental Impacts of PM. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
9. Gaydos T.M., Pinder R., Koo B., Fahey K., and Pandis S.N. Development and application of a three-dimensional aerosol chemical transport model, PMCAMx. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 2594-2611
10. Gery M.W., Whitten J.P., Killus J.P., and Dodge M.C. A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research 9 (1989) 925-956
11. Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J., Stauffer, D.R., 1995. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note: NCAR/TN-398+STR 〈http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/documents/mm5-desc-doc.html〉.
12. Hakami A., Odman M.T., and Russel A.G. High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models. Environmental Science and Technology 37 (2003) 2442-2452
13. Karydis V.A., Tsimpidi A.P., and Pandis S.N. Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) for all four seasons. Journal of Geophysical Research 12 (2007) 1-23
14. Kleeman M.J., and Cass G.R. A 3D Eulerian source-oriented model for an externally mixed aerosol. Environmental Science and Technology 35 (2001) 4834-4848
15. Klemm R.J., Mason R.M., Heilig C.M., Neas L.M., and Dockery D.W. Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles? Data reconstruction and replication analysis. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 50 (2000) 1215-1222
16. Kunzli N., Kaiser R., Medina S., Studnicka M., Chanel O., Filiger P., Herry M., Horak F., Puybonnieux-Texier V., Quenel P., Schneider J., Seethaler R., Vergnaud J.C., and Sommer H. Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution. Lancet 356 (2000) 795-801
17. LADCO, 2003. Midwest Regional Planning Organization: Base E Modeling Inventory. Prepared by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium. 〈http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/BaseE/baseEreport.pdf〉.
18. Lane T.E., Pinder R.W., Shrivastava M., Robinson A.L., and Pandis S.N. Source contributions to primary organic aerosol: comparison of the results of a source-resolved model and the chemical mass balance approach. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 3758-3776
19. McHenry J.H., Binkowski F.S., Dennis R.L., Chang J.S., and Hopkins D. The Tagged Species Engineering Model (TSEM). Atmospheric Environment 26A (1992) 1427-1443
20. Schwartz J. Air pollution and hospital admissions for heart disease in eight US counties. Epidemiology 10 (1999) 14-22
21. Seinfeld J.H., and Pandis S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (1998), Wiley, New York, NY
22. Ying Q., and Kleeman M.J. Source contributions to the regional distribution of secondary particulate matter in California. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 736-752
23. Ying Q., Mysliwiec M., and Kleeman M.J. Source apportionment of visibility impairment using a three-dimensional source-oriented air quality model. Environmental Science and Technology 38 (2004) 1089-1101