Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: A report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Cancer

Volumn 121, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1369-1378

  Allison, Kimberly H ^a   Abraham, Linn A ^b   Weaver, Donald L ^c   Tosteson, Anna N A ^d   Nelson, Heidi D ^e   Onega, Tracy ^d,j   Geller, Berta M ^f   Kerlikowske, Karla ^g   Carney, Patricia A ^h   Ichikawa, Laura E ^b   Buist, Diana S M ^b,i   Elmore, Joann G ⁱ  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^j NORRIS COTTON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

atypia; breast biopsy; breast cancer diagnosis; breast pathology; ductal carcinoma in situ; false positive; mammography

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LOBULAR IN SITU NEOPLASIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING; INCIDENCE; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928301263     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29199     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, et al. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer. Feb 15 2006; 106 (4): 732-742.
2. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1997; 169 (4): 1001-1008.
3. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). 2013. http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed July 24th, 2013.
4. Radiology ACo. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: Amercian College of Radiology; 2013.
5. Carney PA, Geller BM, Moffett H, et al. Current Medico-legal and Confidentiality Issues in Large Multi-center Research Programs. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000; 152 (4): 371-378.
6. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL., Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Annals of internal medicine. Oct 18 2011; 155 (8): 481-492.
7. Cochran WG., Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics. 1954; 10 (4): 417-451.
8. Armitage P., Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and Frequencies. Biometrics. 1955; 11 (3): 375-386.
9. Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL., Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Feb 3 2010; 102 (3): 170-178.
10. Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ., Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology. Dec 2012; 265 (3): 707-714.
11. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. Oct 27 2005; 353 (17): 1773-1783.
12. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology. Nov 2009; 253 (2): 353-358.
13. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital vs. film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155 (8): 493-502.
14. Picouleau E, Denis M, Lavoue V, et al. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: the black hole of routine breast cancer screening. Anticancer research. Dec 2012; 32 (12): 5441-5446.
15. Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD., Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. Jan 2009; 192 (1): 229-234.
16. Bailar JC, 3rd. Diagnostic drift in the reporting of cancer incidence. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Jun 3 1998; 90 (11): 863-864.
17. Kerlikowske K, Cook AJ, Buist DS, et al. Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Aug 20 2010; 28 (24): 3830-3837.
18. Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of internal medicine. May 1 2012; 156 (9): 635-648.
19. Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Tamimi RM., Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use and a family history of breast cancer. Cancer causes & control: CCC. May 2012; 23 (5): 785-790.
20. Yu S, Ying Y, Lurdes YT, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA., Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: Analysis of randomized screening trials. JNCI. 2005.
21. Lehtimaki T, Lundin M, Linder N, et al. Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. Breast cancer research: BCR. 2011; 13 (6): R134.