Leibniz and his correspondents

Leibniz and his Correspondents

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-310

  Lodge, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928288375     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511498237     Document Type: Book

References (232)

1. Adams, M. 1987. Ockham, 2 vols. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
2. Adams, R. M. 1994. Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Aiton, E. J. 1985. Leibniz. A Biography. Bristol: Adam Hilger.
4. Allison, H., ed. 1974. The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Andreu, A., Echeverría, J., and Roldàn, C., eds. 2002. Ciencia, Tecnología y bien común: La actualidad de Leibniz. Valencia: Editorial U. P. V.
6. Anonymous. 1745. Virorum Celeberr. God. Gul. Leibnitii et Johann. Bernoulli Commercium philosophicum et Mathematicum. Lucerne and Geneva: Bousquet.
7. Antognazza, M. R. 1999. “Immeatio and emperichoresis: The Theological Roots of Harmony in Bisterfeld and Leibniz,” in S. Brown, ed. 1999:41–64.
8. Antognazza, M. R. 2001. “Debilissimae Entitates?: Bisterfeld and Leibniz’s Ontology of Relations.” The Leibniz Review11:1–22.
9. Arkell, R. L. 1939. Caroline of Ansbach: George the Second’s Queen. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Arthur, R. T. 1989. “Russell’s Conundrum: On the Relation of Leibniz’s Monads to the Continuum,” in J. R. Brown and J. Mittelstrass, eds. 1989:171–201.
11. Arthur, R. T. 1997. “Symposium on Beeley.” Leibniz Society Review7:25–42.
12. Avramov, I. 1999. “An Apprenticeship in Scientific Communication: The Early Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg (1656–63).” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London53:187–201.
13. Barber, W. H. 1955. Leibniz in France from Arnauld to Voltaire: A Study in French Reactions to Leibnizianism, 1670–1760. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
14. Baruzi, J. 1907. Leibniz et l’organisation religuese de la terre d’apres des documents inédits. Paris: F. Alcan.
15. Baumgarten, A. 1779. Metaphysica, 7th edition. Halle, Germany: Hemmerde.
16. Bayle, P. 1697. Dictionnaire Historique et Critique, 1st edition. Rotterdam: Reinier Leers. Cited by volume and page.
17. Beck, L. W. 1969. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Beeley, P. 1996a. Kontinuität und Mechanismus. Zur Philosophie des jungen Leibniz in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
19. Beeley, P. 1996b. “Points, extension and the mind-body problem,” in R. S. Woolhouse, ed. 1996:15–36.
20. Beeley, P. 1999. “Mathematics and Nature in Leibniz’s Early Philosophy,” in S. Brown, ed. 1999:123–145.
21. Beeley, P. 2002. “Leibniz on Scientific Controversy,” in A. Andreu, J. Echeverría, and C. Roldàn, eds. 2002:215–226.
22. Beeley, P. and Scriba, C. J., eds. 2003. Correspondence of John Wallis (1616–1703), Volume 1 (1641–1659). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Belaval, Y. 1962. Leibniz: Initiation à sa philosophie. Paris: J. Vrin.
24. Berkeley, G. 1710. A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dublin: Pepyat. Reprinted in G. Berkeley 1948–1957, Volume 2. Cited by section.
25. Berkeley, G. 1944. Philosophical Commentaries, Generally Called the Commonplace Book. Ed. by A. A. Luce. London: Nelson. Reprinted in Berkeley, G. 1948–1957, Volume 2. Cited by section.
26. Berkeley, G. 1948–1957. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols. Ed. by A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. London: Nelson.
27. Bernstein, H. 1980. “Conatus, Hobbes, and the Young Leibniz.” Studies in the History of Science11:25–37.
28. Bertoloni Meli, D. 1993. Equivalence and Priority. Newton versus Leibniz. Including Leibniz’s Unpublished Manuscripts on the Principia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Bertoloni Meli, D. 1999. “Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke.” Journal of the History of Ideas60:469–486.
30. Birch, T. 1756–1757. The History of the Royal Society of London for Improving of Natural Knowledge, 4 vols. London: A. Millar. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1968.
31. Blondel, M. 1930. Une énigme historique: Le “vinculum substantiale” d’après Leibniz et l’ébauche d’un réalisme supérieur. Paris: J. Vrin.
32. Boas Hall, M. 1975. “The Royal Society’s Role in the Diffusion of Information in the Seventeenth Century.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London29:173–192.
33. Boas Hall, M. 1978. “Leibniz and the Royal Society 1670–76.” Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa17:171–182.
34. Boas Hall, M. 2002. Henry Oldenburg: Shaping the Royal Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Bodéüs, R. 1993. Leibniz-Thomasius, Correspondence, 1663–1672. Paris: J. Vrin.
36. Bogen, J. and McGuire, J., eds. 1985. How Things Are. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
37. Bouillier, F. 1868. Histoire de la philosophie Cartésienne. Paris: C. Delagrave et cie.
38. Breger, H. 1984. “Elastizität als Strukturprinzip der Materie bei Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft13:112–121.
39. Broad, C. D. 1975. Leibniz: An Introduction. Ed. by C. Lewy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Brown, G. 1988. “Leibniz’s Theodicy and the Confluence of Worldly Goods.” Journal of the History of Philosophy26:571–591.
41. Brown, J. R. and Mittelstrass, J., eds. 1989. An Intimate Relation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
42. Brown, S. 1984. Leibniz. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
43. Brown, S. 1990. “Christian Averroism, Fideism and ‘the Two-Fold Truth’,” in G. Vesey, ed. 1990:207–223.
44. Brown, S. 1996. “Leibniz’s New System Strategy,” in R. S. Woolhouse, ed. 1996: 37–61.
45. Brown, S. 1998. “Body, Soul and Natural Immortality.” The Monist81:573–590.
46. Brown, S. ed. 1999. The Young Leibniz and his Philosophy (1646–1676). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
47. Busche, H. 1997. Leibniz’ Weg ins perspektivische Universum: Eine Harmonie im Zeitalter der Berechnung. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
48. Clarke, S. 1717. A Collection of Papers which passes between the late Learned Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Clarke, In the Years 1715 and 1716. Relating to the Principles of Natural Philosophy and Religion. London: James Knapton.
49. Clauberg, J. 1664. Disputationes Physicae. Published as a part of a series of related works, with an introduction by Johannes de Raey and entitled Physica, Quibus Rerum Corporearum Vis&Natura, Mentis ad Corpus Relatae Proprietates, denique Corporis ac Mentis Arcta&Admirabilis in Homine Conjunctio Explicantur. Amsterdam: D. Elsevier.
50. Corr, C. A. 1975. “Christian Wolff and Leibniz.” Journal of the History of Ideas36:241–262.
51. Corr, C. A. 1980. “Christian Wolff’s German Metaphysics Volumes, Their Revisions, and Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa21:231–239.
52. Couturat, L. 1901. La Logique de Leibniz. Paris: Alcan.
53. Cover, J. A. and O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. 1999. Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Cram, D. and Maat, J., eds. 2001. George Dalgano on Universal Language. The Art of Signs (1661), The Deaf and Dumb Man’s Tutor (1680), and the Unpublished Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Dascal, M. 1978. La Sémiologie de Leibniz. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.
56. Dascal, M. 1987. Leibniz. Language, Signs and Thought. A Collection of Essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Della Rocca, M. 1994. “Mental Content and Skepticism in Descartes and Spinoza.” Studia Spinozana10:19–42.
58. De Raey, J. 1654. Clavis Philosophiae Naturalis sive Introductio ad Contemplationem Naturae Aristotelico-Cartesiana, Leiden: J & D. Elsevier.
59. Desmaizeaux, P. 1720. Receuil de diverses Pièces sur la Philosophie, la Religion naturelle, l’Histoire, les Mathematiques etc. par Mrs Leibniz, Clarke, Newton et autres Autheurs célèbres. Amsterdam: Sauzet.
60. Digby, K. 1651. Demonstratio immortalitatis animae rationalis, sive tractatus duo philosophici [ … ] Praemittitur huic Latinae editioni Praefatio metaphysica, authore Thoma Anglo ex Albiis Eastsaxonum. Paris: Villery and Iosse.
61. Dobbs, B. J. T. 1991. The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Döring, D. 1996. Der junge Leibniz und Leipzig: Ausstellung zum 350. Geburtstag von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz im Leipziger Alten Rathaus, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
63. Duchesneau, F. 1993. Leibniz et la méthode de la science. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
64. Duchesneau, F. 1994. La dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: J. Vrin.
65. Earman, J. 1977. “Perceptions and Relations in the Monadology.” Studia Leibnitiana9:212–230.
66. École, J. 1990. La Métaphysique de Christian Wolff. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
67. Eustachius a Sancto Paulo. 1648. Summa philosophiae quadripartita. Cambridge. 1st edition. Paris, 1609.
68. Eze, E. 1997. Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
69. Fardella, M. 1683. Restitutae ac methodicae philosophiae et matheseos praecipuae et utiliores assertiones. Rome.
70. Fardella, M. 1691a. Universae Philosophiae Systema. In quo nova quadam, et extricata Methodo, Naturalis Scientiae et Moralis fundamenta explanantur. Tomus Primus. Rationalis et emendatae Dialecticae specimen tradens [… ]. Venice.
71. Fardella, M. 1691b. Universae usualis mathematicae theoria. Venice.
72. Fardella, M. 1698. Animae humanae natura ab Augustino detecta. Venice.
73. Femiano, S. 1979. Ricerca su Michelangelo Fardella, filosofo e matematico (1650–1718). Cassino.
74. Femiano, S. 1982. “Über den Briefwechsel zwischen Michelangelo Fardella und Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana15:153–183.
75. Femiano, S. 1986. Fardella: Pensieri scientifici e Lettera antiscolastica. Naples.
76. Fichant, M. 1996. “Leibniz, cet inconnu.” La Vie des Sciences13:343–353.
77. Fichant, M. 1998. Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presse universitaires de France.
78. Finster, R. 1997. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Der Briefwechsel mit Antoine Arnauld. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
79. Foucher, S. 1673. Dissertation sur la recherche de la vérité, ou sur la logique des academiciens. Dijon.
80. Foucher, S. 1675. Critique de la recherche de la vérité. Paris. Trans. in R. A. Watson and M. Greene. 1995.
81. Foucher, S. 1676. Réponse pour la critique à la preface du second volume de la recherche de la verité, où l’on examine le sentiment de M. Descartes touchant les idées, avec plusieurs remarques pour les sciences. Paris: Charles Angot.
82. Foucher, S. 1679. Nouvelle dissertation sur la recherche de la verité, contenant la réponse à la critique de la critique de la recherche de la verité, où l’on découvre les erreurs des dogmatistes, tant anciens que nouveaux, avec une discution particuliere du grand principe des cartesiens. Paris: Robert de la Caille.
83. Foucher, S. 1682. De la sagesse des anciens, où l’on fait voir que les principales maximes de leurs morales ne sont pas contraire au christianisme 1682. Paris: Antoine Dezalier.
84. Foucher, S. 1686. Réponse à la critique de la critique de la recherche de la verité sur la philosophie des academiciens: seconde partie: Où il est parlé de sentiment de S. Augustin touchant les academicians. Paris: Antoine Lambin.
85. Foucher, S. 1693. Dissertations sur la recherche de la vérité, contenant l’histoire et les principes de la philosophie des academiciens. Avec plusiers réflexions sur les sentimens de M. DescartesParis: J. Anisson. (A compilation of the material presented in Foucher’s three treatises on the Academic philosophy.)
86. Foucher de Careil, A. 1905. Mémoire sur la philosophie de Leibniz. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval.
87. Frémont, C. 1981. L’être et la relation. Paris: J. Vrin.
88. Garber, D. 1985. “Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Middle Years,” in K. Okruhlick and J. R. Brown, eds. 1985:27–130.
89. Garber, D. 1992. Descartes Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90. Garber, D. 1995. “Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy,” in N. Jolley, ed. 1995:270–352.
91. Garber, D. 1996. “Body, Monad, and Corporeal Substance: Review Essay of Robert M. Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist.” Leibniz Society Review6:89–106.
92. Gassendi, P. 1972. The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi. Ed. and trans. by C. B. Brush. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
93. Gaukroger, S., ed. 1991. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
94. Goldenbaum, U. 1999. “Transubstantiation, Physics and Philosophy at the Time of the Catholic Demonstrations,” in S. Brown, ed. 1999:79–102.
95. Greengrass, M., Leslie, M., and Raylor, T., eds. 1994. Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation. Studies in Intellectual Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
96. Gruber, J. D., ed. 1745. Commercii epistolici leibnitiani. 2 Teile [2 vols.] 2nd edition?. Hannover: Schmid.
97. Guhrauer, G. E. 1842. Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibnitz: Eine Biographie, 2 vols. Breslau: F. Hirt. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1966.
98. Hall, A. R. 1980. Philosophers at War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. Hannequin, A. 1908. “La première philosophie de Leibnitz.” Études d’histoire des sciences et d’histoire de la philosophie, Vol. 2: 17–224. Paris: Alcan.
100. Hartz, G. 1992. “Leibniz’s Phenomenalisms.” Philosophical Review101:511–550.
101. Hartz, G. 1998. “Why Corporeal Substances Keep Popping Up in Leibniz’s Later Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy6:193–207.
102. Hartz, G. and Cover, J. A. 1988. “Space and Time in the Leibnizian Metaphysic.” Nous22:493–519.
103. Harrison, P. 1995. “Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas56:531–553.
104. Hatton, R. M. 1978. George I: Elector and King. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105. Heidanus, A. 1676. Consideratiën over eenige Saecken onlanghs voorgevallen in de Universiteyt binnen Leyden. Leiden.
106. Henninger, M. 1989. Relations: Medieval Theories, 1250–1325. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
107. Hevelius, J. 1670. “An Extract of a Letter, written by Monsieur Hevelius to the Publisher, from Dantzick, July 5, 1670. Containing chiefly an late Observation on the Variation of the Magnetick Needle [ … ].” Philosophical Transactions64:2059–2061.
108. Hill, C. 1965. Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109. Hochstetter, E. 1966. “Leibniz-Interpretation.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale20:174–192.
110. Hofmann, J. E. 1974. Leibniz in Paris 1672–1676. His Growth to Mathematical Maturity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
111. Hutton, S. 1993. “Damaris Cudworth, Lady Masham: Between Platonism and Enlightenment.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy1:29–54.
112. Huygens, C. 1669a. “Extrait d’une lettre de M. Hugens à l’Auteur du Journal.” Journal des Sçavans, March 18, 1669: 22–24.
113. Huygens, C. 1669b. “A Summary Account of the Laws of Motion, communicated by Mr. Christian Hugens in a Letter to the R. Society, and since printed in French in the Journal des Scavans of March 18, 1669. St. n.” Philosophical Transactions46:925–928.
114. Iltis, C. 1971. “Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy.” Isis62:21–35.
115. Ishiguro, H. 1990. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
116. Israel, J. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650– 1750. New York: Oxford University Press.
117. Jacob, A. 1991. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth, and Berkeley,” in S. Gaukroger, ed. 1991:101–121.
118. Jesseph, D. M. 1999. Squaring the Circle: The War between Hobbes and Wallis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
119. Jolley, N. 1984. Leibniz and Locke: A study of the New Essays on Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
120. Jolley, N., ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Kabitz, W. 1909. Die Philosophie des jungen Leibniz. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
122. Klever, W. N. A. 1988. “Burchard de Volder (1643–1709), a Crypto-Spinozist on a Leiden Cathedra.” Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas15:191–241.
123. Kortholt, C. 1734–1742. Viri Illustriss. Godefridi Guil. Leibnitii EPISTOLAE AD DIVERSOS, 4 vols. Leipzig: Breitkopf.
124. Kraye, J., ed. 1996. Cambridge Companion to Humanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
125. Kraye, J. and Stone, M., eds. 1999. London Studies in the History of Philosophy, Volume 1. London: Routledge.
126. Krempel, A. 1952. La doctrine de la relation chez Saint Thomas: Exposé historique et systématique. Paris: J. Vrin.
127. Kulstad, M. 1980. “A Closer Look at Leibniz’s Alleged Reduction of Relations.” Southern Journal of Philosophy18:417–432.
128. Kulstad, M. 1991. Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness, and Reflection. München: Philosophia.
129. Lach, D. 1957. The Preface to Leibniz’ Novissima Sinica. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
130. Lauria, D. 1974. Agostinismo e cartesianesimo in Michelangelo Fardella. Catenia.
131. Leclerc, I. ed., 1973. The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
132. Le Clerc, J. 1709. “Eloge de feu Mr. De Volder Professeur en Philosophie et aux Mathematiques, dans l’Academie de Leide,” in J. Le Clerc ed. 1703–1713: t XVIII, 346–401.
133. Le Clerc, J., ed. 1703–1713. Bibliotheque choisie, pour servir de suite a la Bibliotheque universelle. Amsterdam: Chez Henri Schelte.
134. Leinsle, U. G. 1988. Reformversuche protestantischer Metaphysik im Zeitalter des Rationalismus, Augsburg: Marlo.
135. Levey, S. 1998. “Leibniz on Mathematics and the Actually Infinite Division of Matter.” Philosophical Review107:49–96.
136. Lewis, G. 1952. Lettres de Leibniz à Arnauld d’après un manuscrit inédit. Paris: Press universitaires de France.
137. Lodge, P. 1998a. “The Failure of Leibniz’s Correspondence with De Volder.” Leibniz Society Review8:47–67.
138. Lodge, P. 1998b. “Leibniz’s Heterogeneity Argument Against the Cartesian Conception of Body.” Studia Leibnitiana30:83–102.
139. Lodge, P. 2001a. “Leibniz’s Notion of an Aggregate.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy9:467–486.
140. Lodge, P. 2001b. “The Debate Over Extended Substance in Leibniz’s Correspondence with De Volder.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science15:155–165.
141. Lodge, P. 2002. “Leibniz on Aggregates, Divisibility and Cartesian Bodies.” Studia Leibnitiana34:59–80.
142. Lodge, P. (forthcoming). “Burchard de Volder: Crypto-Spinozist or Disenchanted Cartesian?” in T. Schmaltz ed.
143. Loemker, L. E. 1973. “Leibniz’s Conception of Philosophical Method,” in I. Leclerc, ed. 1973:135–157.
144. Look, B. 1999. Leibniz and the ‘Vinculum Substantiale.’Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
145. Look, B. 2002. “On Monadic Domination in Leibniz’s Metaphysics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy10:379–399.
146. Loosen, R. and Vonessen F. 1968. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Zwei Briefe über das binäre Zahlensystem und die chinesische Philosophie. Stuttgart: Belser-Presse.
147. Lunsingh Scheurleer, T. H. and Posthumus Meyjes G. H. M., eds. 1975. Leiden University in the Seventeenth Century: An Exchange of Learning. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
148. Malebranche, N. 1674–1675. De la Recherche de la Vérité où l’on traite de la nature de l’esprit de l’homme, & l’usage qu’il en doit faire pour éviter l’erreur dans les sciences. Paris.
149. Malebranche, N. 1678. Éclaircissements sur La Recherche de la Vérité. Paris.
150. Masham, D. 1696. A Discourse Concerning the Love of God. London: Awnsham & John Churchill.
151. Masham, D. 1705. Occasional Thoughts in Reference to a Vertuous or Christian Life. London: Awnsham & John Churchill.
152. Mathieu, V. 1960. Leibniz e des Bosses. Turin: Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia.
153. McGuire, J. 1985. “Phenomenalism, Relations, and Monadic Representations: Leibniz on Predicate Levels,” in J. Bogen and J. McGuire, eds. 1985: 205–233.
154. Mercer, C. 1993. “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism,” in T. Sorell, ed. 1993:33–67.
155. Mercer, C. 1999. “Humanist Platonism in Seventeenth-Century Germany,” in J. Kraye and M. Stone, eds. 1999:147–159.
156. Mercer, C. 2001. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
157. Merkel, F. R. 1920. G.W. Leibniz und die China-Mission. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung.
158. Moll, K. 1978–1996. Der junge Leibniz, 3 vols. Stuttgart: Fromann-Holzboog.
159. Mugnai, M. 1992. Leibniz’ Theory of Relations. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
160. Müller, U., ed. 1987. Salve Academicum. Festschrift der Stadt Schweinfurt anläßlich des 300. Jahretages der Priviligierung der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina durch Kaiser Leopold I. vom 7. August 1687. Schweinfurt: Stadtarchiv.
161. Müller, K. and Krönert, G. 1969. Leben und Werk von G. W. Leibniz. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
162. Nason, J. W. 1946. “Leibniz’s Attack on the Cartesian Conception of Extension.” Journal of the History of Ideas7:447–483.
163. Nesselrath, H. G. and Reinbothe H. 1979. Das Nueste über China. Koln: Deutsche China-Gesellschaft.
164. Nizolio, M. 1553. De Veris Principiis et Vera Ratione Philosophandi contra Pseudophilosophos. Parma. (G. W. Leibniz, ed., Frankfurt 1670).
165. Nowak, K. and Poser, H., eds. 1999. Wissenschaft und Weltgestaltung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
166. Oldenburg, H. 1671. “[Advertisement of ] Hypothesis physica nova, sive Theoria motus concreti, una cum Theoria motus abstracti. Auth. Gothofredo Guilielmo Leibitio [ … ].” Philosophical Transactions73:2213–2214.
167. Okruhlick, K. and Brown, J. R., eds. 1985. The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Dordrecht: Reidel.
168. de Pater, C. 1975. “Experimental Physics,” in T. H. Lunsingh Scheurleer and G. H. M. Posthumus Meyjes, ed. 1975:309–328.
169. Perkins, F. 2002. “Virtue, Reason, and Cultural Exchange: Leibniz’s Praise for the Natural Morality of the Chinese.” Journal of the History of Ideas63:447–464.
170. Pfizenmaier, T. C. 1997. “Was Isaac Newton an Arian?” Journal of the History of Ideas58:57–80.
171. Phemister, P. 2003. “Exploring Leibniz’s Kingdoms: A Philosophical Analysis of Nature and Grace.” Ecotheology7:126–145.
172. Pombo, O. 1987. Leibniz and the Problem of a Universal Language. Münster: Nodus.
173. Popkin, R. H. 1966.“Leibniz and the French Sceptics.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 76-77:228-248
174. Popkin, R. H. 1991. Pierre Bayle. Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
175. Poser, H. 1999. “Theoria cum praxi: Das Leibnizsche Akademiekonzept und die Technikwissenschaften,” in K. Nowak and H. Poser, eds. 1999:93–115.
176. Přívratskà, J. and Přívratský, V. 1994. “Language as the Product and Mediator of Knowledge: The Concept of J. A. Comenius,” in M. Greengrass et al., eds. 1994:162–173.
177. Probst, S. 1997. Die mathematische Kontroverse zwischen Thomas Hobbes und JohnWallis. Dissertation Univ. Regensburg 1994. Hannover:
178. Ravier, E. 1937. Bibliographie des Oeuvres de Leibniz. Paris: F. Alcan.
179. Robinet, A. 1986. Architectonique disjonctive, automates systemiques, et idealiste transcendentale. Paris: J. Vrin.
180. Robinet, A. 1988. G. W. Leibniz: Iter Italicum (Mars 1689–Mars 1690). Firenze: L. S. Olschki.
181. Robinet, A. 1991. L’empire leibnizien: La conquête de la chaire de mathématiques de l’Université de Padoue: Jakob Hermann et Nicolas Bernoulli, 1707–1719. Trieste:
182. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. 1999. “Leibniz’s Argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in His Correspondence with Clarke.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy77:429–438.
183. Ruestow, E. G. 1973. Physics at 17th. and 18th. Century Leiden. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
184. Russell, B. 1937. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, 2nd edition. London: Allen & Unwin.
185. Russell, L. J. 1927. “The Correspondence between Leibniz and De Volder.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society28:155–176.
186. Rutherford, D. 1990. “Leibniz’s Analysis of Multitude and Phenomena into Unities and Reality.” Journal of the History of Philosophy28:525–552.
187. Rutherford, D. 1994. “Leibniz and the Problem of Monadic Aggregation.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie76:65–90.
188. Rutherford, D. 1995. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press.
189. Rutherford, D. 1996. “Demonstration and Reconciliation: The Eclipse of the Geometrical Method in Leibniz’s Philosophy,” in R. S. Woolhouse, ed. 1996:181–201.
190. Sault, R. 1693. Conference betwixt a modern Atheist and his Friend. London.
191. Schmaltz, T., ed. forthcoming. Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti- Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe. London: Routledge.
192. Schneewind, J. B., ed. 1990. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology, Volume 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.
193. Schneider, M. 1994. “Leibniz’ Konzeption der Characteristica Universalis zwischen 1677 und 1690.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie48:213–236.
194. Schönfeld, M. 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.
195. Schönfeld, M. 2002. “ChristianWolff and Leibnizian Monads.” The Leibniz Review12:131–135.
196. Scriba, C. J. 1987. “Auf der Suche nach neuen Wegen. Die Selbstdarstellung der Leopoldina und der Royal Society in London in ihrer Korrespondenz der ersten Jahre (1664–1669),” in U. Müller, ed. 1987:69–82.
197. Sleigh, R. C., Jr. 1990. Leibniz and Arnauld. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
198. Sorell, T., ed. 1993. The Rise of Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
199. Stimson, D. 1939. “Hartlib, Haak and Oldenburg: Intelligencers” Isis31:309–326.
200. Sturm, J. C. 1686. Philosophia Eclectica. Altdorf.
201. Thiel, U. 1991. “Cudworth and Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness,” in S. Gaukroger, ed. 1991:79–99.
202. Thomasius, J. 1658. Breviarium Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Leipzig.
203. Thomasius, J. 1665. Schediasma Historicum. Leipzig.
204. Thomasius, J. 1670. Physica, Perpetuo Dialogo. Leipzig: G. H. Frommann.
205. Thomasius, J. 1676. Exercitatio de Stoica mundi exustione: cui accesserunt argumenti varii, sed inprimis ad historiam Stoicae philosopohiae facientes, dissertationes XXI. Leipzig: F. Lanckisius.
206. Thomasius, J. 1693. Dissertationes LXIII&Varii Argumenti Magnam Partem ad Historiam Philosophicam&Ecclesiasticam Pertinentes. Ed. and preface by C. Thomasius. Halle.
207. Thomasius, J. 1699. Origines Historiae Philosophicae & Ecclesiasticae. Preface by C. Thomasius. Halle: J. G. Renger.
208. Vailati, E. 1997. Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of their Correspondence. New York: Oxford University Press.
209. Verbeek, T. 1992. Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637–1650. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
210. Veesenmeyer, G. 1788. G. G. Leibnitii Epistolae Ad D. Joanem Andream Schmidium, Theologum Helmstadiensem. Norimberg: G. P. Monath.
211. Vesey, G., ed. 1990. The Philosophy in Christianity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
212. de Volder, B. 1685. Disputationes philosophicae omnes contra atheos. Middleburg: Lateranus.
213. de Volder, B. 1695. Exercitationes academicae quibus Renati Cartesii philosophia efenditur adversus Petri Danielis Huetii censuram philosophiae Cartesianae. Amsterdam: Van Ravenstein. Cited by volume and page.
214. de Volder, B. 1698. Oratio de rationis viribus, et usu in scientiis. Leiden: Boutesstein.
215. Wallis, J. 1669. “A Summary Account given by Dr. JohnWallis, of the General Laws of Motion, by way of Letter written by him to the Publisher, and communicated to the R. Society, Novemb. 26, 1668.” Philosophical Transactions43:864–866.
216. Wallis, J. 1671. “Dr. Wallis’s opinion concerning the Hypothesis Physica Nova of Dr. Leibnitius, promised in Numb. 73. and here inserted in the same tongue, wherein it was written to the Publisher, April. 7. 1671.” Philosophical Transactions74:2227–2231.
217. Watkins, E. 1998. “From Pre-established Harmony to Physical Influx: Leibniz’s Reception in Eighteenth Century Germany.” Perspectives on Science6:136–203.
218. Watkins, E. forthcoming. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
219. Watson, R. A. 1987. The Breakdown of Cartesian Metaphysics. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
220. Watson, R. A. and Greene M. 1995. Malebranche’s First and Last Critics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
221. Webster, C. 1975. The Great Instauration. Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. London: Duckworth.
222. Weigel, E. 1658. Analysis Aristotelica ex Euclide Restituta. Jena: Grosium.
223. Weinberg, J. 1965. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
224. Westfall, R. S. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. New York: Cambridge University Press.
225. Widmaier, R. 1983. Die Rolle der Chinesischen Schrift in Leibniz’s Zeichentheorie. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
226. Wilson, C. 1989. Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
227. Wilson, C. 1995. “The Reception of Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century,” in N. Jolley, ed. 1995:442–474.
228. Wolff, C. 1963. Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General. Trans. Richard J. Blackwell. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
229. Woolhouse, R. S. 1993. Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz. London: Routledge.
230. Woolhouse, R. S., ed. 1996. Leibniz’s ‘New System.’Florence: Leo S. Olschki.
231. Wren, C. 1669. “Dr. Christopher Wrens Theory concerning the same Subject [sc. General Laws of Motion]; imparted to the R. Society Decemb. 17, last, though entertain’d by the Author divers years ago, and verified by many Experiments, made by Himself and that other excellent Mathematician M. Rook before the said Society, as is attested by many Worthy Members of that Illustrious Body.” Philosophical Transactions43:867–868.
232. Zacher, H. 1973. Die Hauptschriften zur Dyadik von G.W. Leibniz. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.