The debate over extended substance in Leibniz's correspondence with de Volder

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 155-165

  Lodge, Paul ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61149105641     PISSN: 02698595     EISSN: 14699281     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02698590120059022     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. BOLTON, M. (1996) The nominalist argument of the New Essays, Leibniz Society Review, 6, pp. 1-24.
2. HARTZ, G. & COVER, J. (1988) Space and time in the Leibnizian metaphysic, Noûs, 22, pp. 493-519.
3. KLEVER, W. (1988) Burchard de Voider (1643-1709), a crypto-spinozist on a Leiden cathedra, Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas, 15, pp. 191-241.
4. LODGE, P. (1998a) Leibniz's anti Cartesian metaphysics of body: a study of the correspondence between Leibniz and De Voider, Ph. D. dissertation, Rutgers University.
5. LODGE, P. (1998b) The failure of Leibniz's correspondence with De Voider, Leibniz Society Review, 8, pp. 47-67.
6. LODGE, P. (2001) Leibniz's notion of an aggregate, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 9.
7. RUESTOW, E. (1973) Physics at 17th. and 18th. Century Leiden (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff).