Quantitative measurement of text difficulty: What’s the use?

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 256-269

  Cunningham, James W ^a   Mesmer, Heidi Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928164357     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: 15548279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Biemiller, A., Rosenstein, M., Sparks, R., Landauer, T. K., & Foltz, P. W. (2013). Models ofvocabulary acquisition: Direct tests and text-derived simulations of vocabulary growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, (ahead-of-print), 1-25.
2. Bormuth, J. R. (1966). Readability: A new approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 79-132.
3. Coleman, D., & Pimentel, S. (2012). Revised publishers’ criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, grades 3-12. Retrieved from the Common Core Standards Initiative at www.corestandards.org/assets/Publishers_Criteria_for_3-12.pdf
4. Coleman, E. B. (1965). On understanding prose: Some determiners of its complexity (NSF Final Report GB-2604). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
5. Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948).A formula for predicting readability.Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20, 37-54.
6. Deane, P., Sheehan, K. M., Sabatini, J., Futagi, Y., & Kostin, I. (2006).Differences in text structure and its implications for assessment of struggling readers.Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 257-275.
7. Flesch, R. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
8. Gellert, A. S., & Elbro, C. (2013). Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(1), 16-28.
9. Goldman, S. R., & Lee, C. D. (2014). Text complexity: State of the art and the conundrums it raises. Elementary School Journal, 115(2).
10. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223-234.
11. Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
12. Harrison, C. (1980). Readability in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hogan, T. P. (2007). Psychological testing: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
14. Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 681-744). New York: Longman.
15. Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Koslin, B. I., Zeno, S., & Koslin, S. (1987). The DRP: An effective measure in reading. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
17. McCall, W. A., & Crabbs, L. M. (1925).Standard test lessons in reading: Teacher’s manual for all books. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
18. Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 235-258.
19. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.(2010a). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
20. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Appendix A. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf
21. Nelson, J., Perfetti, C., Liben, D., & Liben, M. (2012, February 1). Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade levels and student performance. Report submitted to the Gates Foundation.Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2012/Measures%20ofText%20Difficulty_final.2012.pdf#sthash.G2KsbUcs.dpuf
22. Pearson, P. D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2014). The state ofthe field: Qualitative analyses oftext complexity. Elementary School Journal, 115(2).
23. Shanahan, T., Kamil, M. L., & Tobin, A. W. (1982).Cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly, 17(2), 229-255.
24. Stenner, A. J. (1996, October 31). Measuring reading comprehension with the Lexile framework.Durham, NC: MetaMetrics. Paper presented at the California Comparability Symposium. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED435977).
25. Williamson, G. L. (2006). Aligning the journey with a destination: A model for K-16 reading standards. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics.
26. Williamson, G. L. (2008). A text readability continuum for postsecondary readiness.Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 602-632.
27. Williamson, G. L., Fitzgerald, J., & Stenner, A. J. (2013). The Common Core State Standards’ quantitative text complexity trajectory: Figuring out how much complexity is enough. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 59-69.