The Common Core State Standards' Quantitative Text Complexity Trajectory: Figuring Out How Much Complexity Is Enough

Educational Researcher

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 59-69

  Williamson, Gary L ^a   Fitzgerald, Jill ^a,b   Stenner, A Jackson ^a,b  

^a MetaMetrics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

descriptive analysis; literacy; reading; standard setting

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875352930     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12466695     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author; 2006:.
2. The condition of college readiness. Iowa City, IA: Author; 2009:.
3. Adams M.Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990:.
4. Adams M.Reading more, reading better: Are American students reading enough of the right stuff?. Hiebert E. H., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2009:163-189.
5. Allington R. L.Reading more, reading better. Hiebert E. H., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2009:30-54.
6. Allington R. L.,McGill-Franzen A.Handbook of research on comprehension. Israel S. E.Duffy G. G., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008:551-568.
7. Beach R. W.Issues in analyzing alignment of language arts Common Core standards with state standards.Educational Researcher. 2011;40:179-182.
8. Betts E. A.Foundations of reading instruction, with emphasis on differentiated guidance. New York, NY: American Book Company; 1946:.
9. Bond T. G.,Fox C. M.Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007:.
10. Bryan G.,Fawson P. C.,Reutzel D. R.Sustained silent reading: Exploring the value of literature discussion with three non-engaged readers.Reading Research and Instruction. 2003;43:47-73.
11. Carver R. P.,Leibert R. E.The effect of reading library books at different levels of difficulty upon gain in reading ability.Reading Research Quarterly. 1995;30:26-48.
12. Catts H. W.,Hogan T. P.,Adlof S. M.The connections between language and reading disabilities. Catts H. W.Kamhi A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:25-40.
13. Chall J. S.Stages of reading development. Fort worth, TX: Harcourt Brace; 1996:.
14. Clay M. M.An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 1993:.
15. Clay M. M.Change over time in children's literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 2001:.
16. Connor C. M.,Morrison F. J.,Fishman B. J.,Schatschneider C.,Underwood P.The early years: Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction.Science. 2007;315:464-465.
17. Donovan C. A.,Smolkin L. B.,Lomax R. G.Beyond the independent-level text: Considering the reader-text match in first graders' self-selections during recreational reading.Reading Psychology. 2000;21:309-333.
18. Eccles J. S.,Lord S.,Midgley C.What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on adolescents.American Journal of Education. 1991;99:521-542.
19. Ehri L. C.,Dreyer L. G.,Flugman B.,Gross A.Reading rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language minority students who are struggling readers in first grade.American Educational Research Journal. 2007;44:414-448.
20. Ehri L. C.,Snowling M.Handbook of language and literacy development and disorders. Shulman B.Apel K.Ehren B.Silliman E.Stone C., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2004:433-460.
21. Fisher D.,Frey N.,Lapp D.Text complexity: Raising rigor in reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; 2012:.
22. Fitzgerald J.,Shanahan T.Reading and writing relations and their development.Educational Psychology. 2000;93:3-22.
23. Gambrell L. B.,Wilson R. M.,Gantt W. N.Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers.Journal of Educational Research. 1981;74:400-404.
24. GewertzC. (2012, June28). A new way to gauge text complexity: Too complex?Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2012/06/13/index.html.
25. Graesser A. C.,D'Mello S.Emotions during the learning of difficult material.Psychology of Learning and Motivation. in press;:.
26. Graesser A. C.,McNamara D.,Kulikowich J.Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher. 2011;40:223-234.
27. Gunning T.Text complexity: Raising rigor in reading. Fisher D.Frey M.Lapp D., ed. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; 2012:ix-x.
28. Guthrie J. T.,Wigfield A.Handbook of reading research. Kamil M.Mosenthal P. B.Pearson P. D.Barr R., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:403-422.
29. HasbrouckJ. (2006). Drop everything and read-but how? For students who are not yet fluent, silent reading is not the best use of classroom time. American Educator, 30. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/newspubs/periodicals/ae/summer2006/hasbrouck.cfm.
30. Hayes D. P.,Wolfer L. T.,Wolfe M. F.Sourcebook simplification and its relation to the decline in SAT-Verbal scores.American Educational Research Journal. 1996;33:489-508.
31. Hauspie R. C.,Molinari L.Methods in human growth research. Hauspie R. C.Cameron N.Molinari L., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010:205-233.
32. Hiebert E. H.The common core's staircase of text complexity: Getting the size of the first step right.Reading Today. 2012;29 (3): 26-27.
33. Invernizzi M.,Hayes L.Handbook of reading disability research. McGill-Franzen A.Allington R. L., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:196-207.
34. Leach J. M.,Scarborough H. S.,Rescorla L.Late-emerging reading disabilities.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003;95:211-224.
35. Lipsey M. W.,Derzon J. H.Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Loeber R.Farrington D. P., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:86-105.
36. Luke A.Literacy, textbooks, and ideology. London, UK: Falmer Press; 1988:.
37. Merlini-Barbaresi L.Complexity in language and text. Merlini-Barbaresi L., ed. Pisa, Italy: Edizioni Plus; 2003:23-66.
38. Mesmer H. A.,Cunningham J. W.,Hiebert E. H.Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future.Reading Research Quarterly. 2012;47:235-258.
39. MetaMetrics. (n.d.) Lexile framework for reading. Retrieved from http://lexile.com/.
40. Metsala J. L.Young children's phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999;91:3-19.
41. The nation's report card: Reading 2011. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2011:.
42. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Appendix A. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website: http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards.
43. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Supplemental information for Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy: New research on text complexity. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website: http://www.corestandards.org/resources.
44. O'Connor R.,Bell K.,Harty K.,Larkin L.,Sackor S.,Zigmond N.Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002;94:474-485.
45. Paris S. G.,Pearson P. D.,Cercetti G.,Carpenter R.,Paris A. H.,DeGroot, et alSummer learning: Research, policies, and programs. Borman G. D.Boulay M., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2004:121-161.
46. Perfetti C. A.Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford Press; 1985:.
47. Perfetti C. A.Problems and interventions in literacy development. Reitsma P.Verhoeven L., ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer; 1998:1-48.
48. Porter-MageeK. (2012, June27). Does the Common Core overcomplicate text selection?Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/common-core-watch/2012/does-the-common-core-overcomplicate-text-selection.html.
49. Questar Assessment. (n.d.). Degrees of reading power. Retrieved from http://www.questarai.com/Products/DRPProgram/Pages/default.aspx.
50. Rosenblatt L.Making meaning with texts: Selected essays. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 2005:.
51. Scarborough H. S.The connections between language and reading disabilities. Catts H. W.Kamhi A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:3-24.
52. Spear-Swerling L.Handbook of reading disabilities. McGill-Franzen A.Allington R. L., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:149-161.
53. Stahl S. A.,Heubach K.Fluency-oriented reading instruction.Journal of Literacy Research. 2005;37:25-60.
54. Stenner A. J.,Swartz C. A causal Rasch model for understanding comprehension in the context of reader-text-task. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education; 2012Vancouver, Canada; 2012.
55. Torgesen J. K.,Alexander A.,Wagner R. K.,Rashotte C.,Voeller K.,Conway T.Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2001;34:3-58.
56. U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.) The nation's report card: Reading 2011. National assessment of educational progress at grades 4 and 8. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute for Education Sciences, United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/.
57. Wang Q.,Pomerantz E. M.The motivational landscape of early adolescence in the United States and China: A longitudinal investigation.Child Development. 2009;80:1272-1287.
58. White S.,Clement J.Assessing the Lexile framework: Results of a panel meeting. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 2001:.
59. Williamson G. L.A text readability continuum for postsecondary readiness.Journal of Advanced Academics. 2008;19:602-632.
60. Wixson K. Using the CCSS-ELA concept of text complexity to improve teaching and learning. Presentation at the ePals National Summit on Text Complexity; 2012Chicago, IL; 2012.