Mechanisms of boundary formation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling

Developmental Biology

Volumn 401, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 122-131

  Cayuso, Jordi ^a   Xu, Qiling ^a   Wilkinson, David G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Boundary formation; Eph receptor; Ephrin; Repulsion; Tension

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; ADAM10 ENDOPEPTIDASE; BETA CATENIN; CADHERIN; EPHRIN; EPHRIN RECEPTOR; F ACTIN; MESP2 PROTEIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; RHO FACTOR; RHO KINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UVOMORULIN; EPHRIN RECEPTOR A1;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL REPULSION; CONTACT INHIBITION; CYTOSKELETON; ECTODERM; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; GASTRULATION; MEMBRANE FORMATION; MESODERM; MORPHOGENESIS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEUROECTODERM; NOTOCHORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RECEPTOR BINDING; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMITE; SUPPLEMENTARY EYE FIELD; TISSUE BOUNDARY FORMATION; ANIMAL; EMBRYOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; ORGANOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; VERTEBRATE;

VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; EPHRINS; ORGANOGENESIS; RECEPTOR, EPHA1; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84927948680     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: 1095564X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.11.013     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Abercrombie M. Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature 1979, 281:259-262.
2. Astin J.W., Batson J., Kadir S., Charlet J., Persad R.A., Gillatt D., Oxley J.D., Nobes C.D. Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:1194-1204.
3. Barrios A., Poole R.J., Durbin L., Brennan C., Holder N., Wilson S.W. Eph/Ephrin signaling regulates the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of the paraxial mesoderm during somite morphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1571-1582.
4. Batlle E., Wilkinson D.G. Molecular mechanisms of cell segregation and boundary formation in development and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4:a008227.
5. Bochenek M.L., Dickinson S., Astin J.W., Adams R.H., Nobes C.D. Ephrin-B2 regulates endothelial cell morphology and motility independently of Eph-receptor binding. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:1235-1246.
6. Calzolari S., Terriente J., Pujades C. Cell segregation in the vertebrate hindbrain relies on actomyosin cables located at the interhombomeric boundaries. EMBO J. 2014, 33:686-701.
7. Carvalho R.F., Beutler M., Marler K.J., Knoll B., Becker-Barroso E., Heintzmann R., Ng T., Drescher U. Silencing of EphA3 through a cis interaction with ephrinA5. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:322-330.
8. Cavodeassi F., Carreira-Barbosa F., Young R.M., Concha M.L., Allende M.L., Houart C., Tada M., Wilson S.W. Early stages of zebrafish eye formation require the coordinated activity of Wnt11, Fz5, and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Neuron 2005, 47:43-56.
9. Cavodeassi F., Ivanovitch K., Wilson S.W. Eph/Ephrin signalling maintains eye field segregation from adjacent neural plate territories during forebrain morphogenesis. Development 2013, 140:4193-4202.
10. Chan J., Mably J.D., Serluca F.C., Chen J.N., Goldstein N.B., Thomas M.C., Cleary J.A., Brennan C., Fishman M.C., Roberts T.M. Morphogenesis of prechordal plate and notochord requires intact Eph/ephrin B signaling. Dev. Biol. 2001, 234:470-482.
11. Chang L.H., Chen P., Lien M.T., Ho Y.H., Lin C.M., Pan Y.T., Wei S.Y., Hsu J.C. Differential adhesion and actomyosin cable collaborate to drive Echinoid-mediated cell sorting. Development 2011, 138:3803-3812.
12. Chung H.A., Yamamoto T.S., Ueno N. ANR5, an FGF target gene product, regulates gastrulation in Xenopus. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:932-939.
13. Cooke J., Moens C., Roth L., Durbin L., Shiomi K., Brennan C., Kimmel C., Wilson S., Holder N. Eph signalling functions downstream of Val to regulate cell sorting and boundary formation in the caudal hindbrain. Development 2001, 128:571-580.
14. Cooke J.E., Kemp H.A., Moens C.B. EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere-boundary formation in the zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:536-542.
15. Cooke J.E., Xu Q., Wilson S.W., Holder N. Characterisation of five novel zebrafish Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases suggests roles in patterning the neural plate. Dev. Genes Evol. 1997, 206:515-531.
16. Cortina C., Palomo-Ponce S., Iglesias M., Fernandez-Masip J.L., Vivancos A., Whissell G., Huma M., Peiro N., Gallego L., Jonkheer S., Davy A., Lloreta J., Sancho E., Batlle E. EphB-ephrin-B interactions suppress colorectal cancer progression by compartmentalizing tumor cells. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:1376-1383.
17. Dahmann C., Basler K. Compartment boundaries: at the edge of development. Trends Genet. 1999, 15:320-326.
18. Dahmann C., Oates A.C., Brand M. Boundary formation and maintenance in tissue development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:43-55.
19. Davis S., Gale N.W., Aldrich T.H., Maisonpierre P.C., Lhotak V., Pawson T., Goldfarb M., Yancopoulos G.D. Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 1994, 266:816-819.
20. Dravis C., Yokoyama N., Chumley M.J., Cowan C.A., Silvany R.E., Shay J., Baker L.A., Henkemeyer M. Bidirectional signaling mediated by ephrin-B2 and EphB2 controls urorectal development. Dev. Biol. 2004, 271:272-290.
21. Durbin L., Brennan C., Shiomi K., Cooke J., Barrios A., Shanmugalingam S., Guthrie B., Lindberg R., Holder N. Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites. Genes Dev. 1998, 12:3096-3109.
22. Egea J., Klein R. Bidirectional Eph-ephrin signaling during axon guidance. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17:230-238.
23. Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands the ephrins. Cell 1997, 90:403-404. Eph Nomenclature Committee.
24. Eriksson O., Ramstrom M., Hornaeus K., Bergquist J., Mokhtari D., Siegbahn A. The Eph tyrosine kinase receptors EphB2 and EphA2 are novel proteolytic substrates of tissue factor/coagulation factor VIIa. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, in press.
25. Fagotto F. The cellular basis of tissue separation. Development 2014, 141:3303-3318.
26. Fagotto F., Rohani N., Touret A.S., Li R. A molecular base for cell sorting at embryonic boundaries: contact inhibition of cadherin adhesion by ephrin/Eph-dependent contractility. Dev. Cell 2013, 27:72-87.
27. Filas B.A., Oltean A., Majidi S., Bayly P.V., Beebe D.C., Taber L.A. Regional differences in actomyosin contraction shape the primary vesicles in the embryonic chicken brain. Phys. Biol. 2012, 9:066007.
28. Fraser S., Keynes R., Lumsden A. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 1990, 344:431-435.
29. Gale N.W., Holland S.J., Valenzuela D.M., Flenniken A., Pan L., Ryan T.E., Henkemeyer M., Strebhardt K., Hirai H., Wilkinson D.G., Pawson T., Davis S., Yancopoulos G.D. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 1996, 17:9-19.
30. George E.L., Georges-Labouesse E.N., Patel-King R.S., Rayburn H., Hynes R.O. Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin. Development 1993, 119:1079-1091.
31. Glazier J.A., Zhang Y., Swat M., Zaitlen B., Schnell S. Coordinated action of N-CAM, N-cadherin, EphA4, and ephrinB2 translates genetic prepatterns into structure during somitogenesis in chick. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2008, 81:205-247.
32. Gonzalez-Quevedo R., Lee Y., Poss K.D., Wilkinson D.G. Neuronal regulation of the spatial patterning of neurogenesis. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:136-147.
33. Guthrie S., Lumsden A. Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain. Development 1991, 112:221-229.
34. Guthrie S., Prince V., Lumsden A. Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts. Development 1993, 118:527-538.
35. Gutzman J.H., Sive H. Epithelial relaxation mediated by the myosin phosphatase regulator Mypt1 is required for brain ventricle lumen expansion and hindbrain morphogenesis. Development 2010, 137:795-804.
36. Hall A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 1998, 279:509-514.
37. Hansen M.J., Dallal G.E., Flanagan J.G. Retinal axon response to ephrin-As shows a graded, concentration-dependent transition from growth promotion to inhibition. Neuron 2004, 42:717-730.
38. Harris A.K. Is cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. J. Theor. Biol. 1976, 61:267-285.
39. Hattori M., Osterfield M., Flanagan J.G. Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent. Science 2000, 289:1360-1365.
40. Heyman I., Kent A., Lumsden A. Cellular morphology and extracellular space at rhombomere boundaries in the chick embryo hindbrain. Dev. Dyn. 1993, 198:241-253.
41. Himanen J.P., Chumley M.J., Lackmann M., Li C., Barton W.A., Jeffrey P.D., Vearing C., Geleick D., Feldheim D.A., Boyd A.W., Henkemeyer M., Nikolov D.B. Repelling class discrimination: ephrin-A5 binds to and activates EphB2 receptor signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:501-509.
42. Holmberg J., Clarke D.L., Frisen J. Regulation of repulsion versus adhesion by different splice forms of an Eph receptor. Nature 2000, 408:203-206.
43. Horikawa K., Radice G., Takeichi M., Chisaka O. Adhesive subdivisions intrinsic to the epithelial somites. Dev. Biol. 1999, 215:182-189.
44. Hwang Y.S., Lee H.S., Kamata T., Mood K., Cho H.J., Winterbottom E., Ji Y.J., Singh A., Daar I.O. The Smurf ubiquitin ligases regulate tissue separation via antagonistic interactions with ephrinB1. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:491-503.
45. Iden S., Collard J.G. Crosstalk between small GTPases and polarity proteins in cell polarization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:846-859.
46. Irving C., Nieto M.A., DasGupta R., Charnay P., Wilkinson D.G. Progressive spatial restriction of Sek-1 and Krox-20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation. Dev. Biol. 1996, 173:26-38.
47. Ivanovitch K., Cavodeassi F., Wilson S.W. Precocious acquisition of neuroepithelial character in the eye field underlies the onset of eye morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 2013, 27:293-305.
48. Janes P.W., Saha N., Barton W.A., Kolev M.V., Wimmer-Kleikamp S.H., Nievergall E., Blobel C.P., Himanen J.P., Lackmann M., Nikolov D.B. Adam meets Eph: an ADAM substrate recognition module acts as a molecular switch for ephrin cleavage in trans. Cell 2005, 123:291-304.
49. Jorgensen C., Sherman A., Chen G.I., Pasculescu A., Poliakov A., Hsiung M., Larsen B., Wilkinson D.G., Linding R., Pawson T. Cell-specific information processing in segregating populations of Eph receptor ephrin-expressing cells. Science 2009, 326:1502-1509.
50. Julich D., Geisler R., Holley S.A. Integrinalpha5 and delta/notch signaling have complementary spatiotemporal requirements during zebrafish somitogenesis. Dev. Cell 2005, 8:575-586.
51. Julich D., Mould A.P., Koper E., Holley S.A. Control of extracellular matrix assembly along tissue boundaries via Integrin and Eph/Ephrin signaling. Development 2009, 136:2913-2921.
52. Kemp H.A., Cooke J.E., Moens C.B. EphA4 and EfnB2a maintain rhombomere coherence by independently regulating intercalation of progenitor cells in the zebrafish neural keel. Dev. Biol. 2009, 327:313-326.
53. Klein R. Bidirectional modulation of synaptic functions by Eph/ephrin signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:15-20.
54. Klein R. Eph/ephrin signalling during development. Development 2012, 139:4105-4109.
55. Koshida S., Kishimoto Y., Ustumi H., Shimizu T., Furutani-Seiki M., Kondoh H., Takada S. Integrinalpha5-dependent fibronectin accumulation for maintenance of somite boundaries in zebrafish embryos. Dev. Cell 2005, 8:587-598.
56. Krieg M., Arboleda-Estudillo Y., Puech P.H., Kafer J., Graner F., Muller D.J., Heisenberg C.P. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:429-436.
57. Landsberg K.P., Farhadifar R., Ranft J., Umetsu D., Widmann T.J., Bittig T., Said A., Julicher F., Dahmann C. Increased cell bond tension governs cell sorting at the Drosophila anteroposterior compartment boundary. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1950-1955.
58. Lee H.-L., Bong Y.-S., Moore K.B., Soria K., Moody S.A., Daar I.O. Dishevelled mediates ephrinB1 signaling in the eye field via the planar cell polarity pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:55-63.
59. Lee H.S., Nishanian T.G., Mood K., Bong Y.S., Daar I.O. EphrinB1 controls cell-cell junctions through the Par polarity complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:979-986.
60. Lumsden A., Keynes R. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 1989, 337:424-428.
61. Lumsden A., Krumlauf R. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 1996, 274:1109-1115.
62. Maitre J.L., Berthoumieux H., Krens S.F., Salbreux G., Julicher F., Paluch E., Heisenberg C.P. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 2012, 338:253-256.
63. Marquardt T., Shirasaki R., Ghosh S., Andrews S.E., Carter N., Hunter T., Pfaff S.L. Coexpressed EphA receptors and ephrin-A ligands mediate opposing actions on growth cone navigation from distinct membrane domains. Cell 2005, 121:127-139.
64. Marston D.J., Dickinson S., Nobes C.D. Rac-dependent trans-endocytosis of ephrinBs regulates Eph-ephrin contact repulsion. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:879-888.
65. McCaffrey L.M., Macara I.G. Widely conserved signaling pathways in the establishment of cell polarity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1:a001370.
66. Mellitzer G., Xu Q., Wilkinson D.G. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 1999, 400:77-81.
67. Monier B., Pelissier-Monier A., Brand A.H., Sanson B. An actomyosin-based barrier inhibits cell mixing at compartmental boundaries in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:60-65.
68. Moore K.B., Mood K., Daar I.O., Moody S.A. Morphogenetic movements underlying eye field formation require interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 signaling pathways. Dev. Cell 2004, 6:55-67.
69. Nakajima Y., Morimoto M., Takahashi Y., Koseki H., Saga Y. Identification of Epha4 enhancer required for segmental expression and the regulation by Mesp2. Development 2006, 133:2517-2525.
70. Nakaya Y., Kuroda S., Katagiri Y.T., Kaibuchi K., Takahashi Y. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition during somitic segmentation is regulated by differential roles of Cdc42 and Rac1. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:425-438.
71. Ninomiya H., David R., Damm E.W., Fagotto F., Niessen C.M., Winklbauer R. Cadherin-dependent differential cell adhesion in Xenopus causes cell sorting in vitro but not in the embryo. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:1877-1883.
72. Nittenberg R., Patel K., Joshi Y., Krumlauf R., Wilkinson D.G., Brickell P.M., Tickle C., Clarke J.D. Cell movements, neuronal organisation and gene expression in hindbrains lacking morphological boundaries. Development 1997, 124:2297-2306.
73. Park E.C., Cho G.S., Kim G.H., Choi S.C., Han J.K. The involvement of Eph-Ephrin signaling in tissue separation and convergence during Xenopus gastrulation movements. Dev. Biol. 2011, 350:441-450.
74. Parsons J.T., Horwitz A.R., Schwartz M.A. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:633-643.
75. Pasquale E.B. Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:462-475.
76. Pasquale E.B. Eph-ephrin bidirectional signaling in physiology and disease. Cell 2008, 133:38-52.
77. Poliakov A., Cotrina M., Wilkinson D.G. Diverse roles of eph receptors and ephrins in the regulation of cell migration and tissue assembly. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:465-480.
78. Poliakov A., Cotrina M.L., Pasini A., Wilkinson D.G. Regulation of EphB2 activation and cell repulsion by feedback control of the MAPK pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:933-947.
79. Reintsch W.E., Habring-Mueller A., Wang R.W., Schohl A., Fagotto F. beta-Catenin controls cell sorting at the notochord-somite boundary independently of cadherin-mediated adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:675-686.
80. Rifes P., Carvalho L., Lopes C., Andrade R.P., Rodrigues G., Palmeirim I., Thorsteinsdottir S. Redefining the role of ectoderm in somitogenesis: a player in the formation of the fibronectin matrix of presomitic mesoderm. Development 2007, 134:3155-3165.
81. Rohani N., Canty L., Luu O., Fagotto F., Winklbauer R. EphrinB/EphB signaling controls embryonic germ layer separation by contact-induced cell detachment. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000597.
82. Rohani N., Parmeggiani A., Winklbauer R., Fagotto F. Variable combinations of specific ephrin ligand/eph receptor pairs control embryonic tissue separation. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12:e1001955.
83. Saga Y. Segmental border is defined by the key transcription factor Mesp2, by means of the suppression of Notch activity. Dev. Dyn. 2007, 236:1450-1455.
84. Sato Y., Yasuda K., Takahashi Y. Morphological boundary forms by a novel inductive event mediated by lunatic fringe and Notch during somitic segmentation. Development 2002, 129:3633-3644.
85. Schaupp A., Sabet O., Dudanova I., Ponserre M., Bastiaens P., Klein R. The composition of EphB2 clusters determines the strength in the cellular repulsion response. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 204:409-422.
86. Sobieszczuk D.F., Wilkinson D.G. Masking of Eph receptors and ephrins. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:R469-R470.
87. Solanas G., Cortina C., Sevillano M., Batlle E. Cleavage of E-cadherin by ADAM10 mediates epithelial cell sorting downstream of EphB signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1100-1107.
88. Steinberg M.S. Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J. Exp. Zool. 1970, 173:395-433.
89. Steinberg M.S., Takeichi M. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91:206-209.
90. Stigloher C., Ninkovic J., Laplante M., Geling A., Tannhauser B., Topp S., Kikuta H., Becker T.S., Houart C., Bally-Cuif L. Segregation of telencephalic and eye-field identities inside the zebrafish forebrain territory is controlled by Rx3. Development 2006, 133:2925-2935.
91. Suetterlin P., Marler K.M., Drescher U. Axonal ephrinA/EphA interactions, and the emergence of order in topographic projections. Sem. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23:1-6.
92. Takahashi Y., Sato Y. Somitogenesis as a model to study the formation of morphological boundaries and cell epithelialization. Dev. Growth Diff. 2008, 50(Suppl 1):S149-S155.
93. Tanaka M., Kamo T., Ota S., Sugimura H. Association of dishevelled with Eph tyrosine kinase receptor and ephrin mediates cell repulsion. EMBO J. 2003, 22:847-858.
94. Terriente J., Gerety S.S., Watanabe-Asaka T., Gonzalez-Quevedo R., Wilkinson D.G. Signalling from hindbrain boundaries regulates neuronal clustering that patterns neurogenesis. Development 2012, 139:2978-2987.
95. Thisse, B., Wright, G.J., Thisse, C., 2008. Embryonic and larval expression patterns from a large scale screening for novel low affinity extracellular protein interactions. ZFIN Direct Data Submission. http://zfin.org).
96. Thisse, C., Thisse, B., 2005. High throughput expression analysis of ZF-models consortium clones. ZFIN Direct Data Submission. http://zfin.org.
97. Turner A., Snape A.M., Wylie C.C., Heasman J. Regional identity is established before gastrulation in the Xenopus embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 1989, 251:245-252.
98. Watanabe T., Sato Y., Saito D., Tadokoro R., Takahashi Y. EphrinB2 coordinates the formation of a morphological boundary and cell epithelialization during somite segmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:7467-7472.
99. Wilkinson D.G. Regulation of cell differentiation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2014, in press.
100. Winklbauer R. Cell adhesion in amphibian gastrulation. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009, 278:215-275.
101. Winklbauer R., Medina A., Swain R.K., Steinbeisser H. Frizzled-7 signalling controls tissue separation during Xenopus gastrulation. Nature 2001, 413:856-860.
102. Xu Q., Alldus G., Holder N., Wilkinson D.G. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 1995, 121:4005-4016.
103. Xu Q., Alldus G., Macdonald R., Wilkinson D.G., Holder N. Function of the Eph-related kinase rtk1 in patterning of the zebrafish forebrain. Nature 1996, 381:319-322.
104. Xu Q., Mellitzer G., Robinson V., Wilkinson D.G. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 1999, 399:267-271.
105. Xu Q., Wilkinson D.G. Boundary formation in the development of the vertebrate hindbrain. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2013, 2:735-745.
106. Yang J.T., Bader B.L., Kreidberg J.A., Ullman-Cullere M., Trevithick J.E., Hynes R.O. Overlapping and independent functions of fibronectin receptor integrins in early mesodermal development. Dev. Biol. 1999, 215:264-277.
107. Zimmer M., Palmer A., Kohler J., Klein R. EphB-ephrinB bi-directional endocytosis terminates adhesion allowing contact mediated repulsion. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:869-878.